ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF CONSTANTITY OF SUPPLY CHAINS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES OF UKRAINE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Kateryna Kitrish

Abstract

Industry plays a crucial role in solving current problems, namely: the accelerated development of industry, is a generator of scientific and technological progress and innovation, an important factor in the global competitiveness of national economies and a driver of economic growth. Therefore, increasing attention to the development of industry and industrial policy is one of the main trends in the modern world economy. The purpose of the paper – to analyze the sustainable development of industrial enterprises of Ukraine from the standpoint of security, using a system-structural approach. Methodology. The concept of sustainable development is a management structure that contains a general system view of the ways of transition from the current position of the object of management to the desired, includes the following steps: defining the structure of sustainable development; defining the boundaries of safe existence; identification of the level of sustainability of supply chains; identification of imbalances of sustainable development; to substantiate the methodical approach to estimating the level of sustainability of supply chains of industrial enterprises with the use of economic and mathematical tools; determining the impact of threats and developing institutional measures. The results of the study revealed disparities in sustainable development at the level of economic, social and environmental security of the enterprise, at the level of subordinate components and at the level of indicators that determine the list of major threats, which are calculated indicators of social and economic components of sustainable development. To determine the severity of the impact of threats, the coefficients of elasticity of each component and indicator on the integrated index of sustainable development were calculated and ranked, which is the necessary information for the development of priority measures. Practical implications. The dynamics of deviations of current values of integrated indices from their average optimal values determines the importance of threats to the components of sustainable development. Almost all of these industrial enterprises are characterized by complete neglect of the social status of employees, which inhibits economic growth and makes it impossible to develop domestic demand. Under such conditions, the issue of digitalization of business becomes relevant. The digitalization of business has received considerable attention from both academia and the business community, which define digitalization as a focused effort of companies to actively use digital technologies at all levels to optimize internal processes and modify the overall business model. Value/originality. The obtained strategic guidelines of key macro indicators, which together with the strategic values of indicators are the ultimate goal of sustainable development regulation, which can be monitored through monitoring to monitor the implementation of the Development Strategy and evaluate the policy of enterprise management.

How to Cite

Kitrish, K. (2021). ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF CONSTANTITY OF SUPPLY CHAINS OF INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES OF UKRAINE. Three Seas Economic Journal, 2(3), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2021-3-4
Article views: 31 | PDF Downloads: 21

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

industrial enterprise, supply chain, supply chain management, sustainability, economic security, indicator, stimulator, disincentive, sustainable development, methodological approach, evaluation, macro-indicator

References

Akoff, R. (2002). O menedzhmente [About Management]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter. (in Russian)

Dotsenko, I. O. (2017). Formuvannja systemy ocinjuvannja rivnja ekonomichnoji bezpeky pidpryjemstva z urakhuvannjam vplyvu pidpryjemnycjkykh ryzykiv [Formation of a system for assessing the level of economic security of the enterprise, taking into account the impact of business risks]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ekonomika, 18(1), 69–78. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/j-pdf/Vonu_econ_2013_18_1_10.pdf. (accessed 11 Aug 2021).

Druker, P. (2008). Effektivnoe upravlenie predpriyatiem [Effective enterprise management]. Moscow: Vil'yams. (in Russian)

Fridman, A. (2020). Borotʹba za dushu hlobalʹnoyi ekonomiky [Struggle for the soul of the global economy]. Available at: https://nv.ua/ukr/opinion/maybutnye-zaraz-prognoz-dlya-svitovoji-ekonomiki-na-2020-rik-ostanninovini-50072520.html (Accessed 5 May 2021).

Heymann, E., & Vetter, S. (2013). Europe's re-industrialisation. The gulf between aspiration and reality. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bank AG, DB Research.

Hrishnova, O. A. (2011). Sotsialno-ekonomichni ta demohrafichni naslidky systemnoyi kryzy v Ukrayini ta shlyakhy yikh podolannya [Socio-economic and demographic consequences of the systemic crisis in Ukraine and ways to overcome them]. Available at: https://dse.org.ua/arhcive/15/3.pdf.

Hurzhii, N. M. (2011). Systema marketynghovykh ryzykiv u dijaljnosti pidpryjemstva [System of marketing risks in the activity of the enterprise]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 6(4), 167–170. (in Ukrainian)

Kitrish, K. Yu. (2021). Stalist yak chynnyk upravlinnia lantsiuhamy postachan [Sustainability as a factor in supply chain management]. Infrastruktura rynku, 51, 141–148.

Kharazishvili, Ju. M. (2020). Systemna bezpeka stalogho rozvytku: instrumentarij ocinky, rezervy ta strateghichni scenariji realizaciji [System security of sustainable development: evaluation tools, reserves and strategic implementation scenarios]. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for the Economy of Industry. (in Ukrainian)

Kryvovyazyuk, I. V. (2013) Innovative approach to security assessment in industrial enterprises functioning. Aktualnі problemi ekonomіki, 3(141), 83–95.

Martunyuk Olena (2017). Methodology for Diagnostics of the Company Management and Technological Maturity. Іnternational economics journal Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Vol. 13, № 4. Рр. 31–42. Available at: http://www.mnje.com/sites/mnje.com/files/031-042_martynyuk.pdf

Novikova, M. (2016). Mekhanizm upravlinnja loghistychnymy vytratamy na promyslovomu pidpryjemstvi [Mechanism for managing logistics costs in an industrial enterprise]. Ukraine: Sumy SSU.

Oleksiv, I. (2014). Theoretical and practical approaches to identification of stakeholder interests of the company. Economics, Entrepreneurship, Management, 1(1), 31–35.

Shvab, K. (2019). Choho my khochemo? Try modeli maybutnʹoho na vybir. Novoe vremya [What do we want? Three models of the future to choose from]. Available at: https://nv.ua/ukr/opinion/forum-u-davosi-yak-zminyuyetsya-kapitalizm-ekonomika-novini50057107.html (Accessed 10 Sept 2021).

Trushkina, N. (2020). Upravlinnja lancjughamy postachanj v koncepciji industrializaciji 4.0 [Supply chain management in the concept of industrialization 4.0]. Kyiv: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute for the Economy of Industry. (in Ukrainian)

Trushkina, N. V., Kitrish, K. Yu., & Shkryhun, Yu. O. (2020). Tendentsii rozvytku hlobalnykh lantsiuhiv postachan v umovakh COVID-19 [Trends in the development of global supply chains in the conditions of COVID-19]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 33, 82–88.

Vasjutkina, N. V. (2014). Upravlinnja stalym rozvytkom pidpryjemstv: teoretyko-metodologhichnyj aspekt [Management of sustainable development of enterprises: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Kyiv: Lira-K. (in Ukrainian)

Van Gig (1981). Prikladnaya obshchaya teoriya system. Moscow: Mir. (in Russian)