INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE METHODOLOGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE HROMADAS: GENERAL IDEA AND EXAMPLE OF SMART CITY INFRASTRUCTURE
The purpose of the study is the development of analytical tools and organizational and economic mechanisms for the post-war restoration of sustainable development of territories based on the infrastructural and service methodology of the development of innovative hromadas as a basis for ensuring the well-being of local hromadas to avoid the social, environmental and economic problems of war and their approval within the framework of pilot infrastructural and service projects. Methodology. The research is based on the approach of R. Jochimsen, who, in one of the first system descriptions, defined infrastructure as a set of material (production), institutional and individual conditions available to economic agents, which condition integration and the maximum level of economic activity. It is also worth considering the idea that the main differences of the neo-industrial paradigm of local hromada development lie in competent participation based on self-organization, multisubjectivity and decentralization of social relations based on cooperation and communicative equality, and the orientation of society towards the realization of human potential. Innovative hromadas correspond to these trends and provide an effective solution to the primary task of the service-oriented system, which consists in the development of a service policy capable of ensuring the inclusion of existing resources and functional potential of territories to ensure dynamic, balanced, complex socio-economic development. The infrastructure-service approach includes the maximum satisfaction of human needs and desires, as well as the creation of working and living conditions, and aims to meet the needs of the hromada by attracting and retaining human resources through the development of services and infrastructure. Practical implications. The results of the research have applied socio-economic significance and are aimed at solving the important problem of post-war restoration of sustainable development of territories through the design of service provision and use of resource potential of local innovative hromadas. The main result of the application of the developed methodology is the scientific substantiation of the organizational and economic support for the post-war restoration of the sustainable development of territories based on the infrastructure-service methodology of the development of innovative hromadas and the development of the corresponding analytical toolkit, which will allow its adaptive use within the framework of intelligent specialization. Scientific and methodological approaches will be developed to determine the role of infrastructure and service clusters for the well-being of hromadas, based on a consideration of their impact on human capital and its components. Value/originality. Compared to existing analogues, the proposed approach is systemic, takes into account the specifics of innovative activity and covers the entire range of tasks for managing infrastructure and service factors of sustainable development.
How to Cite
infrastructural and service methodology, innovations, infrastructure, smart city, project
Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., & Tripple, M. (2017). Introduction: Combinatorial Knowledge Bases, Regional Innovation and Development Dynamics. Economic Geography, 93:5, 429–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775
Commission on Science and Technology for Development (2016). Smart cities and infrastructure. Аvailable at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ecn162016d2_en.pdf
Domanski, D., Howaldt, J., & Kaletka, C. (2020). A comprehensive concept of social innovation and its implications for the local context – on the growing importance of social innovation ecosystems and infrastructures. European Planning Studies, 28:3, 454–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397
Frangenheim, A., Trippl, M., & Chlebna, C. (2020). Beyond the Single Path View: Interpath Dynamics in Regional Contexts. Economic Geography, 96:1, 31–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2019.1685378
Grillitsch, M., Martin, R., & Srholec, M. (2017). Knowledge Base Combinations and Innovation Performance in Swedish Regions. Economic Geography, 93:5, 458–479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2016.1154442
Hansen, T. (2013). Bridging regional innovation: cross-border collaboration in the Øresund Region. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 113:1, 25–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00167223.2013.781306
Martin, R., & Simmie, J. (2008). Path dependence and local innovation systems in city-regions. Innovation, 10:2-3, 183–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.453.10.2-3.183
Mokii, A. I., Pavlikha, N. V., Naumenko, N. S., & Datsko, O. I. (2018). Institutional support for innovative development of territorial hromadas of Ukraine. Regional economy, 4, 17–27.
Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Analisys of global aspect of formation of institutional innovative strategies. Technology audit and production reserves, 6/5 (44), 29–35.
Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Analysis of conceptual aspects of institutional and technological design. Technology audit and production reserves, 2/5(40), 31–36.
Omelyanenko, V. (2019). Institutional strategies of system security of technological & innovation systems. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(1), 150–159.
Omelyanenko, V. (2020). National strategic innovation security policy making (theoretical review). Tallinn: Teadmus.
Omelyanenko, V., Braslavska, O., Biloshkurska, N., Biloshkurskyi, M., Kliasen, N., & Omelyanenko, O. (2021). C-Engineering Based Industry 4.0 Innovation Networks Sustainable Development. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 21 (9), 267–274.
Omelyanenko, V., Kudrina, O., Semenikhina, O., Zihunov, V., Danilova, O., & Liskovetska T. (2020). Conceptual aspects of modern innovation policy. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(2), 238–249.
Omelyanenko, V. A., Omelyanenko, O. M., & Artyukhova, N. O. (2021). Marketing of digital innovations in the context of sustainable development of the region. Economy and state, 4, 72–77.
Prokopenko, O., & Omelyanenko, V. (2017). Priority Selection within National Innovation Strategy in Global Context. Economics and Business, 31(1), 5–18.
Tarkhov, P., & Derkach, Zh. (2013). Competitiveness of human capital as a market advantage of the enterprise. Bulletin of the Ternopil National Economic University, 4, 63–68.
Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2018). Regional innovation policies for new path development – beyond neo-liberal and traditional systemic views. European Planning Studies, 26:9, 1779–1795. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1457140
Yevsyukova, O. V. (2018). The dominant principles of the process of managing the development of a service-oriented state in the conditions of transformational changes. Academic notes of TNU named after V.I. Vernadskyi. Series: Public administration, Volume 29 (68), No. 1, 80–85.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.