WORLD-SYSTEM GEOECONOMIC STRATIFICATION: THE ROLE OF NON-EQUIVALENT TECHNOLOGICAL EXCHANGE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to identify and analytically substantiate the role of technological protectionism in the processes of deepening the geoeconomic stratification of the world-system. Methodology. The study employs economic analysis and comparative statistics to examine macroeconomic imbalances; the indicator method is applied for segmentation based on key development indicators; a range of theoretical research methods were employed, with a particular emphasis on abstract, logical, and comparative analysis, abstraction, generalisation, and formalisation. Results. The article examines the processes of contemporary global hierarchization triggered by the asymmetry in the distribution of intellectual rent. Stable disparities in global income distribution and technological potential, which preclude egalitarian development of the world-system, are identified and systematized. The role of technological protectionism as a driver of geoeconomic polarization is revealed, wherein the deployment of complex regulatory standards by the Core creates a "regulatory trap" for the lower tiers of the hierarchy. A direct causal link between non-equivalent technological exchange and the institutional shadowization of international economic relations is proven. It is established that high transaction costs associated with legal certification compel economic agents in the Semi-periphery and Periphery to systematically bypass formal barriers. It is substantiated that such adaptation leads to the camouflaging of commodity nomenclature, invoice price manipulation, and the criminalization of logistics chains. It is generalized that the Core's technological dominance acts as the primary cause of both the structural underdevelopment of the Periphery and the institutional degradation of the global trade environment. Conclusions. The dominant role of geoeconomic segregation has been substantiated. The main types of risks inherent in this mechanism have been identified. Further steps have been proposed to overcome the negative consequences caused by this phenomenon.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
geoeconomic stratification, world-system, non-equivalent technological exchange, intellectual rent, non-tariff barriers, regulatory trap, shadow trade
African Political Economy in the Twenty-First Century: Theories, Perspectives, and Issues / ed. by E. C. Iloh, E. T. Aniche, S. N. Azom. Lanham : Lexington Books, 2023. 402 p. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781666984248.ch-15
BRICS 2026. Official Website. https://www.brics2026.gov.in/about-us/
Gereffi, G. (2018). Global value chains and development: Redefining the contours of 21st century capitalism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559423
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500046544
Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2016). Thinning and thickening: Productive sector policies in the era of global value chains. The European Journal of Development Research, 28(4), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.29
Kozlova, E., & Didenko, N. (2022). The impact of technological development factors on the quality of life: A comparative analysis of E7 and G7. International Journal for Quality Research, 16(2), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR16.02-18
Linking the Formal and Informal Economy: Concepts and Policies / ed. by B. Guha-Khasnobis, R. Kanbur, E. Ostrom. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2006. 291 p.
Nasim, A., Nasir, M. A., & Downing, G. (2024). Determinants of bank efficiency in developed (G7) and developing (E7) countries: Role of regulatory and economic environment. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01272-6
Bressan, R., & Mattos, E. (2026). The effect of nontariff barriers on unreported trade: Exploring a customs duty reform. Oxford Economic Papers, 78(1), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaf030
Özmerdivanlı, A., & Sönmez, Y. (2025). The relationship between financial development, energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental degradation: A comparison of G7 and E7 countries. Economies, 13(10), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13100278
Subhan, A. R., Santosa, B., & Soeharjoto, S. (2021). Bilateral trade flows among G7 member countries and Indonesia: Gravity model approach. Media Ekonomi, 29(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.25105/me.v29i1.9108
Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (1st ed.). University of California Press, 2011.
Whittaker D. H., Sturgeon T. J., Okita T., Zhu T. (2020). Compressed Development: Time and Timing in Economic and Social Development. Oxford : Oxford University Press. 320 p.
World Bank. World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators/
Zubko O. V. (2011). Methodological approaches to determining the levels of technological intensity of Ukrainian exports. Goods and Markets, 1, 59–67. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/tovary_2011_1_9

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.