CRYPTOCURRENCY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF TERRORIST FINANCING

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Valeriia Dyntu

  Oleg Dykyj

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to explain the use of cryptocurrency as a terrorist financing tool. This article has emphasized the ways, which terrorists appraise for being a reliable fundraising means and their adoption. Methodology. For the purposes of the study, the methods of scientific abstraction, synthesis, observation, generalization, as well as the method of induction of literature and legal documents were used to determine the features of bitcoin, promoting and preventing its use for terrorism financing. Results. The development of the Internet and electronic devices has radically changed all spheres of human life, including criminal activity. Digitalization has led to the improvement of ordinary crimes and the emergence of new types of crime, which, in principle, cannot exist without special digital electronic devices. Among the first implementers of new technologies were terrorists, who took advantage of digitalization to increase profitability. Thus, terrorists have now significantly increased their attention to cryptocurrency as a digital means of payment, namely Bitcoin. Bitcoin has a number of features that have attracted the attention of criminals as a way to evade responsibility for a crime. In particular, decentralization avoids the need for confirmation by a central authority, and pseudo-anonymity provides a certain level of anonymity. In addition, terrorists are aware that Bitcoin's confidentiality is extremely fragile and needs to be enhanced. The paper analyzes several ways to enhance anonymity, such as software that anonymizes traffic and prevents IP identification, peer-to-peer mixers, centralized mixing services (tumbler), and other approaches. It is worth emphasizing that for the fight against crime, the main issue is the de-anonymization of the Bitcoin owner/user, which allows the identification of the criminal. Currently, law enforcement agencies use direct and indirect de-anonymization, proliferation analysis, quantitative analysis, time analysis, and transactional network analysis, among others, to achieve the above goal, which are discussed in detail in this article. In addition, agencies around the world investigated and uncovered terrorist groups and their financial facilitators. Specifically, on August 13, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Public Affairs announced "the largest cryptocurrency seizure in the context of terrorism in history." To investigate the agenda, the legal documents of those investigations that contain information about the terrorist fund-raising mechanism were examined and analyzed. The legal documents revealed that these investigations used the aforementioned de-anonymization approaches.

How to Cite

Dyntu, V., & Dykyj, O. (2021). CRYPTOCURRENCY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF TERRORIST FINANCING. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7(5), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-67-72
Article views: 602 | PDF Downloads: 411

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

cryptocurrency, Bitcoin, terrorism-financing, criminal investigation, de-anonymization

References

“This is Our House!” A Preliminary Assessment of the Capitol Hill Siege Participants (2021, March). The official website of GW Program on Extremism. Available at: https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs2191/f/Criminal%20Complaint_Al-Ikhwa%20Accounts.pdf (accessed 08 December 2021)

Case 1:20-cv-02227 Document 1 Filed 08/13/20 Page 1 of 52 Civil Action No. 20-cv-2227. (2020) The official website of GW Program on Extremism. Available at: https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs2191/f/Criminal%20Complaint_Al-Qassam%20Brigade%20Accounts.pdf (accessed 08 December 2021)

Diffie, W., & Hellman, M. (1976) New directions in cryptography. IEEE transactions on Information Theory, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 644–654.

Elgamal, T. (1985). A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 469–472. CiteSeerx. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.476.4791&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 08 December 2021)

FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) (2012) Bitcoin Virtual Currency: Unique Features Present Distinct Challenges for Deterring Illicit Activity. 24 April. WIRED. Available at: http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/threatlevel/2012/05/Bitcoin-FBI.pdf (accessed 08 December 2021)

Frequently Asked Questions. Find answers to recurring questions and myths about Bitcoin. (2021) Bitcoin.org. Available at: http://bitcoin.org/about.html (accessed 08 December 2021)

Global Disruption of Three Terror Finance Cyber-Enabled Campaigns: Largest Ever Seizure of Terrorist Organizations’ Cryptocurrency Accounts (2020, August 13). The official website of U.S. Department of Justice. Available at: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/global-disruption-three-terror-finance-cyber-enabled-campaigns (accessed 08 December 2021)

Global Terrorism Index 2020: Measuring the Impact of Terrorism, Sydney, November 2020. (2020) The official website of Institute for Economics & Peace. Available at: https://visionofhumanity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/GTI-2020-web-1.pdf (accessed 08 December 2021)

Koblitz, N. (1987). Elliptic curve cryptosystems. Mathematics of computation vol. 48, no. 177, pp. 203–209.

Koshy, P., Koshy, D., & McDaniel, P. (2014). An Analysis of Anonymity in Bitcoin Using P2P Network Traffic. 18th International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, FC 2014 (Barbados, 3-7 Mar 2014) Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2014. P. 469–485. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-662-45472-5_30 (accessed 08 December 2021)

Lerner, S. (2013, January 11) New vulnerability: know your peer public addresses in 14 minutes. Bitcoin Forum. Available at: https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=135856,2014 (accessed 08 December 2021)

Meiklejohn, S., Pomarole, M., Jordan, G., Levchenko, K., McCoy, D., Voelker, G. M., & Savage, S. (2013). A fistful of bitcoins: Characterizing payments among men with no names. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet measurement conference, 2013, ACM, New York, pp. 127–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2504730.2504747

Miller, V. S. (1986). Use of Elliptic Curves in Cryptography. In: Williams H.C. (eds) Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO ’85 Proceedings. CRYPTO 1985. pp. 417-426. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39799-X_31

Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system (2009). Bitcoin.org. Available at: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf (accessed 1 December 2021)

Ober, M., Katzenbeisser, S., & Hamacher, K. (2013). Structure and Anonymity of the Bitcoin Transaction Graph. Future Internet, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 237–250. MDPI AG. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fi5020237

Reid, F., & Harrigan, M. (2011.) An Analysis of Anonymity in the Bitcoin System. 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, 2011, pp. 1318–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.79

Reid, F., & Harrigan, M. (2011, Sept. 30). Bitcoin is not anonymous. Fergal Reid’s blog. Available at: http://anonymity-in-bitcoin.blogspot.com.br/2011/07/bitcoin-is-not-anonymous.html (accessed 08 December 2021)

There's Nowhere to Hide from the Economics of Cybercrime (2017). The official website of McAfee Enterprise. Available at: https://www.mcafee.com/enterprise/en-us/solutions/lp/economics-cybercrime.html (accessed 08 December 2021)