The challenges of the digital economy are leading to radical changes in public governance, creating conditions for convenient and prompt access to public services and public information. Moreover, the pandemic has caused drastic changes in the use of digital public service – it has become a necessity. Ukraine has significant prerequisites for the development and effective transformation of public administration to a higher technological level. Furthermore, during the time of crisis (2013-2014, 2020-2021), the government priorities were shifted to support digital transformations to improve the effectiveness of public administration and ensure the sustainability of public finance. The purpose of the paper is to investigate and assess a correspondence between efficiency of governance and sustainability of public finance based on digital transformations under the Ukrainian approach. The main scientific question was: How does the active digital transformation in public governance affect the sustainability of public finance in Ukraine? Methodology. Seeking the solution, own methodological developments were used; correlation analysis of main indicators of government effectiveness and sustainability of public finance was estimated. To assess the impact of digitalization on public governance efficiency, Ukrainian governance practices over the past 13 years were analyzed, expressed by indicators of governance effectiveness, through the introduction of digital technologies. Results. Based on empirical research, it has been found that due to several limitations, a strong direct relationship between active digital transformation and the sustainability of public finances (debt security) has not been identified. But at the same time, significant progress has been made in efficiency of public governance through the implementation of costly but effective digital change. This correspondence is especially noticeable during the crisis caused by the pandemic (2020-2021), during which the involvement of citizens in digital services is very high. Practical implications and value/originality. The convergence of synergies between key aspects – public governance, digitalization, finance, and security – has great potential for relevant solutions that provide a broader view of sustainable development issues. It can be noted that this issue is extremely relevant for further research in the field of public administration and finance in the context of sustainable development of the digital economy.
How to Cite
governance efficiency, government effectiveness, public finance, sustainability, debt security, government spending, e-government development, e-participation, digital transformation, digital competitiveness
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e‐Government. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1944-2866.1076 (accessed 04 January 2022).
Bergmann, A., & Grossi, G. (2014). Symposium on financial sustainability of the public sector: A critical issue for the stakeholders. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(1), 91–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-26-01-2014-B004
Byrd, W., & Guimbert, S. (2009). Public Finance, Security, and Development: A Framework and an Application to Afghanistan, Policy Research Working Paper 4806, The World Bank.
Danshina, Y., & Britchenko, I. (2017). Adaptation of Domestic State Governance to International Governance Models. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 3(5), 116–124. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-5-116-124
Debt statistics, Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, Official website. Available at: https://www.mof.gov.ua/uk/derzhavnij-borg-ta-garantovanij-derzhavju-borg (accessed 10 December 2021).
E-Government Development Index and E-Participation Index in Ukraine, EGDI Overview, UN. Available at: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data/Country-Information/id/180-Ukraine (accessed 03 January 2022).
Fedorov, M. (2021). The launch of the Diia has increased fivefold the number of users of public services online, Government portal, official website. Available at: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/mihajlo-fedorov-zapusk-diyi-u-5-raziv-zbilshiv-kilkist-koristuvachiv-derzhavnih-poslug-onlajn (accessed 19 December 2021).
Government Effectiveness and Control of Corruption Percentiles Rank, Worldwide Governance Indicators, World Bank. Available at: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports (accessed 03 December 2021).
Government spending data, State Treasury Service of Ukraine, Official website. Available at: https://www.treasury.gov.ua/ua/file-storage/vikonannya-derzhavnogo-byudzhetu (accessed 10 December 2021).
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2009). Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust? Information Polity, 14, 173–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2009-0175
Harborne, B., Dorotinsky, W., & Bisca Paul M. (2017). The Basics of Public Finance and the Security Sector, Securing Development: Public Finance and the Security Sector. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0766-4_ch2
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010), The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1682130 (accessed 03 January 2022).
Kornieva, A. (2020). Public Debt Sustainability: Current State, Risks and Perspectives. Problems and Prospects of Economics and Management, 2(22). DOI: https://doi.org/10.25140/2411-5215-2020-2(22)-150-158
Kotina, H., Stepura, M., & Kondro, P. (2017). Debt Security of Ukraine: Assessment, Risks and Prospects. Skhid, 3(149), 10–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21847/1728-9343.2017.3(149).108103
López Subires, M., & Rodríguez Bolívar, M. (2017). Financial Sustainability in Governments. A New Concept and Measure for Meeting New Information Needs, In: Rodríguez Bolívar M. (eds), Financial Sustainability in Public Administration, Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57962-7_1
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Janowski, T. (2020). Design principles for creating digital transparency in government. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1):101550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101550
Matuszk, S. (2021). The digitization of Ukraine: anatomy of a success story, OSW Commentary, Centre for Eastern Studies. Available at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2021-08-23/digitisation-ukraine-anatomy-a-success-story (accessed 25 December 2021).
Onofrei, M., Toader, T., Vatamanu, A. F., & Oprea, F. (2021). Impact of Governments’ Fiscal Behaviors on Public Finance Sustainability: A Comparative Study. Sustainability, 13, 3739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073739
Overall Digital Competitiveness Ranking and Factors in Ukraine, Digital Competitiveness Ranking, IMD. Available at: https://worldcompetitiveness.imd.org/countryprofile/UA/digital (accessed 16 January 2022).
Projects of Digitalization in Public Governance, Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, Official website. Available at: https://thedigital.gov.ua/projects (accessed 29 December 2021).
Saleh, H., Rosadi, I., Manda, D., Maulana, Z., & Idris, S. (2021). The Effect of Good Governance on Financial Performance: An Empirical Study on the Siri Culture. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(5), 795–806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2021.VOL8.NO5.0795
Shcherbak, V. (2020). Сurrent trends in the digital transformation of public administration in Ukraine: the legal aspect, Aspects of public administration, Part, № 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15421/152063
Slemrod, J., & Bakija, J. (2017). Taxing Ourselves, Fifth Edition A Citizen's Guide to the Debate over Taxes, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Press, 545 p.
Ukraine Internet Usage and Marketing Report, Internet World Stats website. Available at: https://www.internetworldstats.com/euro/ua.htm (accessed 17.12.2021)
Yarovoy, T. S., Коzyrieva O. V., Bielska, T. V., Zhuk, I. I., & Mokhova, I. L. (2020). The E-Government Development in Ensuring the Country Financial and Information Security. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(33), 268–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i33.206853