ORGANIZATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

  Yana Derenskaya

Abstract

The present article is aimed at developing a set of recommendations for achieving a higher level of organizational project maturity at a given enterprise. Methodology. For the purposes of the current research, the available information sources on the components of project management system are analysed; the essence of “organizational maturity” and the existing models of organizational maturity are studied. The method of systemic and structural analysis, as well as the method of logical generalization, are employed in order to study the existing models of organizational maturity, to describe levels of organizational maturity, and finally to develop a set of methodological recommendations for achieving a higher level of organizational project maturity at a given enterprise. The results of the research showed that the core elements of project management system are methodological, organizational, programtechnical, and motivational components. Project management encompasses a wide range of issues connected with organizational structure, project team, communication management, project participants, etc. However, the fundamental basis for developing project management concept within a given enterprise starts with defining its level of organizational maturity. The present paper describes various models of organizational maturity (staged, continuous, petal-shaped) and their common types (H. Кеrzner Organizational Maturity Model, Berkeley PM Maturity Model, Organizational Project Management Maturity Model, Portfolio, Program & Project Management Maturity Model). The analysis of available theoretic works showed that the notion “organizational project maturity” refers to the capability of an enterprise to select projects and manage them with the intention of achieving its strategic goals in the most effective way. Importantly, the level of maturity can be improved by means of formalizing the acquired knowledge, regulating project-related activities, and documenting best practices and potential difficulties. Practical implications. For the purposes of the present research, the level of organizational project management maturity of the enterprise in question is evaluated according to the three-level model developed by H. Кеrzner. The conclusion is made that project management maturity of this enterprise corresponds to maturity level 2. Besides, the defined maturity level is specified in more detail along the life cycle phases in order to determine more precisely the position of project management activity of the enterprise within the maturity model. Potential problems (the so-called “bottlenecks”) of the enterprise in the field of project management are identified. Based on the results of the analysis, a number of recommendations are suggested for further development of the corporate system of project management at the given enterprise. The results of the research showed that in order to achieve a higher level of maturity, it is necessary to create a project team, organize a project office, and distribute project management functions among the team members, develop a procedure of involving experts with different professional backgrounds into the project implementation, improve the procedure of creating project teams, ensure the accumulation of best practices of project implementation, establish the corporate standard of project management, and improve the strategic planning for project management, project implementation control, managing changes, labour resources and communication. The suggested guidelines are expected to facilitate the achievement of a higher level of maturity. They also envisage the terms of this transition and the responsible executives. Further enhancement of maturity level is achieved by means of performing a set of activities for improving and aligning various project management sub-processes aimed at managing costs, time, quality, and risks. Another important condition of enhancing organizational maturity is the development of an integrated management system that would help to achieve synergy from combining different methodologies. Value/originality. Assessment of the project management maturity and identification of problems made it possible to develop a set of recommendations for achieving a higher level of organizational project management maturity by the enterprise in question, which in its turn is expected to reduce the costs and the time that are necessary for project implementation.

How to Cite

Derenskaya, Y. (2017). ORGANIZATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 3(2), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-2-25-32
Article views: 254 | PDF Downloads: 45

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

project, project management, organizational maturity, organizational maturity model, levels of organizational maturity.

References

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide). (2008). New-town Square, Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.

Degtyaryev, V. A. (2014). Proektnaya zreloct` i tsennostno-orientirovannoe upravlenie proektami. Retrieved from: http://www.i-mash.ru/materials/economy/64524-proektnaja-zrelost-i-cennostno-orientirovannoe.html

Кеrzner, G. (2010). Strategicheskoe upravlenie v kompanii. Моdel` zrelogo upravleniya proektami. Мoscow: DМК Press.

Levin, K. (2014). Rozvytok systemy upravlinnya proektamy v organizatsiyi seredn`ogo biznesu. Retrieved from: http://it-ua.info/news/2014/05/16/rozvitok-sistemi-upravlnnya-proektami-v-organzac-serednogo-bznesu.html

Маlinina, М. V. (2011). Sovremennye modeli zrelosti organizatsionnogo upravleniya proektami. Upravleniya proektami i programmami, 03(27), 218-230.

Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) – Knowledge Foundation. (2003). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.

Pasian, B. L. (2011). Project management maturity: a critical analysis of existing and emer-gent contributing factors. Sydney: University of Technology.

Pennypacker, J. S. & Grant, K. P. (2003). Project management maturity: an industry bench-mark. Project Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, 4-11.

Polkovnikov, A., Terpugov, A. & Belozerov, A. (2004). Chto takoe modeli zrelosti uprav-leniya proektami? Retrieved from: http://www.cfin.ru/itm /project/opmmm.shtml

Portfolio, Program & Project Management Maturity Model (P3M3). (2006). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.

Rusyakova, М. S. (2014, July). Obzor sovremennyh modeley otsenki zrelocti upravleniya proektami. Young Scientist, 11(70), 230-236.

The Standard for Portfolio Management. (2006). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute.