Maryna Hrysenko

  Olena Pryiatelchuk

  Liudmila Shvorak


The creative economy is currently demonstrating quite intensive development indicators, and the share of the creative sector in GDP creation is constantly growing. The aim of this article is to reveal the interrelation and interdependence of socio-economic development factors and to clarify the place of the creative sector in ensuring sustainable economic growth. On the basis of 19 variables, the economies of the EU countries were analyzed by means of cluster analysis, which allowed the authors to single out 8 clusters in the constructed dendrogram, united by the nature and trends, as well as the role of the creative sector in these processes. In addition, the degree of correlation and interaction between the influencing factors themselves was described. Using RStudio, the authors built two multiple regression models, where the dependent variables were GDP and the global creativity index, and the factors were the indicators used to calculate the creativity index. Innovations and creativity are one of priorities of the program of socio-economic development of the European Union. There is a universal approach to understanding the importance of creative economy in the EU. However, the practical implementation of the strategy of development and activity of the creative industries by the EU countries is carried out in the following different directions – the foreign economic expansion of the creative industries themselves; the promotion of all national culture at the international level; export-oriented development of the creative sector of the economy; the lack of a separate comprehensive strategy of foreign economic activity for the creative industries, but the implementation of various programs and measures aimed at promoting exports of products of these industries as part of a national development strategy. Overall, the active functioning of the EU creative sector directly or indirectly affects the economy by improving its performance and creating jobs, stimulating innovation, and contributing to social and sustainable development. As a result, it was found that the global creativity index is largely dependent on the share of the creative class. It has also been proved that the creative and cultural industries determine the growth of a country's economy in terms of traditional economic and employment indicators. Investments in the creative economy will increase the qualitative and quantitative indicators of sustainable economic development.

How to Cite

Article views: 151 | PDF Downloads: 58



cluster analysis, creative economy, cultural and creative industries, sustainable development


Achrol, R. S., & Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing in the network economy. Journal of marketing, vol. 63. № 4, pp. 146–163.

Andres, L., & Round, J. (2015). The creative economy in a context of transition: A review of the mechanisms of micro-resilience. Cities, vol. 45, pp. 1–6. DOI:

Batabyal, A. A., & Beladi, H. (2015). Aspects of the accumulation of creative capital in a regional economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 98, pp. 88–92. DOI:

Bell, D. (1999). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books. pp. x–xi, xiv, xv–xvii.

Boccella, N., & Salerno, I. (2016). Creative Economy, Cultural Industries and Local Development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 223, pp. 291–296. DOI:

Cabra, J. F., & Guerrero, C. D. (2022). Regional Creativity: Cultural and socio-economic differences. Journal of Creativity. DOI:

Cheng, M. (2016). Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 57, pp. 60–70. DOI:

Daubaraitė, U., & Startienė, G. (2015). Creative Industries Impact on National Economy in Regard to Sub-sectors. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 213, pp. 129–134. DOI:

Dicken, P. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global networks, vol. 1. № 2, pp. 89–112.

Dronyuk, I., Moiseienko, I., & Greguš, J. (2019). Analysis of Creative Industries Activities in Europеan Union Countries. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 160, pp. 479–484. DOI:

Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh: why the future of business is sharing. Portfolio Penguin, 165 p. Available at:

Holford, D. (2018). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures, vol. 105, pp. 143–154. DOI:

Hugo, R., & Reinert, E. S. (2014). Creative Destruction in Economics: Nietzsche, Sombart, Schumpeter. Available at:

Jin Tao, Chun-Yu Ho, Shougui Luo, & Yue Sheng (2019). Agglomeration economies in creative industries. Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 77, pp. 141–154. DOI:

Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., & Westin, L. (2012). Patterns of a network economy. Springer Science & Business Media.

KEA European Commision (2006). The Economy of Culture in Europe. Available at:

Kim, J. (2015). Comparing the economic effects of climate change and zooanthroponosis in Korea: Prerequisites for the creative economy? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 96, pp. 121–129. DOI:

Kramer, B. (2015). Shareology: How Sharing is Powering the Human Economy. Morgan James, 198 р.

Liagouras, G. (2005). The Political Economy of Post-Industrial Capitalism. SAGE Journals. May, vol. 81, issue 1, pp. 20–35. DOI:

Mittone, L., Morreale, A., & Vu, Thi-Thanh-Tam (2022). What drives innovative behavior? An experimental analysis on risk attitudes, creativity and performance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. DOI:

Munro, E. (2017). Building soft skills in the creative economy: Creative intermediaries, business support and the ‘soft skills gap”. Poetics, vol. 64, pp. 14–25. DOI:

Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends: Ten New Directions Transforming Our Lives. New York: Warner books.

Toffler, E. (2003). New paradigm of power. Knowledge, richness, and force. Kharkiv: Akta. (in Ukrainian)

Noreau, J. (2016). The sharing economy: A black box. Desjardins. Economic studies. № 26. Available at:

Robert, A., Lawsona, J., & Clark, R. (2010). Examining the Hayek–Friedman hypothesis on economic and political freedom. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 74, issue 3, pp. 230–239. DOI:

Ruoxi, A., Zang, Z., Zandi, F., & Kim, H. (2020). A Simple Macroeconomic Model of Decentralized Emission Markets Based on the Solow Growth Model. Front. Blockchain. DOI:

Shapiro, C. (1998). Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Press.

Sundararajan, A. (2016). The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sung, Tae Kyung (2015). Application of information technology in creative economy: Manufacturing vs. creative industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 96, pp. 111–120. DOI:

Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy: Promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill. Vol. 1.

Tapscott, D. (2014). The Digital Economy Anniversary Edition: Rethinking Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence, McGraw-Hill.

The World Bank Indicators. Available at:

Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social text, vol. 18, № 2, pp. 33–58.

Veselá, D., & Klimová, K. (2014). Knowledge-based Economy vs. Creative Economy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 141, pp. 413–417. DOI:

Wang, J. et al. (2016). Toward a resilient holistic supply chain network system: Concept, review and future direction. IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 10, № 2, pp. 410–421.

Weber, M. (2002). The imposition of a global development architecture: The example of microcredit. Review of international studies, vol. 28, № 3, pp. 537–555.