THE INSTITUTE OF CITIZEN APPEALS AS AN ACTIVE MECHANISM FOR THE PROTECTION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC HUMAN RIGHTS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Sep 30, 2022

  Volodymyr Dulger

  Serhii Baranov

  Ivan Khozlu

Abstract

The institute of appeal of citizens to state authorities as an effective mechanism of implementation of socio-economic human rights and freedoms is studied. Attention is drawn to the fact that human rights are the highest social value and determine the degree of political, economic, cultural and other human freedoms. The authors established that the state must be accountable to the individual for its activities, in this regard, ensuring human rights and freedoms is the main responsibility of the state, but all this is possible subject to the principle of the rule of law, which in many countries is enshrined as constitutional. It was found that the problematic issues remain related to the definition of international requirements for the mechanism of implementation of the right of citizens to appeal to public authorities, providing a mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal to public authorities using the latest information technologies, etc. The authors have found that the institute of citizens' appeal to public authorities, as a mechanism for exercising human rights and freedoms, includes many important areas, such as the conduct of public affairs, both directly and through freely elected representatives; the functioning of public control; ensuring the right of access to public information, etc. The peculiarities of the development of the institute of citizens' recourse in the context of international experience in the realization of human rights and freedoms were investigated. It was found that the dynamism of the development of international law at the present time has also influenced the fairly rapid development of the institute of citizens' right to appeal to public authorities, which in turn has affected the increased participation of citizens of different states in the political processes in the world. The concept of the right of citizens to appeal to public authorities has been formulated. International requirements for the mechanism of implementation of the citizens' right to appeal to public authorities were analyzed and identified. The authors found that the international requirements for the mechanism of implementation of the citizens' right to appeal to public authorities are based on five basic principles. The prospect of introducing information technology in the process of citizens' applications to public authorities is considered. It was determined that the rapid development of modern information technologies and their introduction into various spheres of social life has not bypassed their introduction into the legal sphere, which in turn led to the processing of increasing volumes of information in a short period of time, and on the other hand, was a consequence of threats of violation of individual rights, through unauthorized access to personal data, their theft and use for criminal purposes. Shows the problematic aspects arising from the introduction of modern technologies in the work with the citizens' appeal, which affect the protection of personal data. The experience of many countries, such as Great Britain, Germany, Scotland, USA, etc., in the implementation of the system of electronic appeal and the use of electronic petitions as the most progressive form of communication with the government is analyzed.

How to Cite

Dulger, V., Baranov, S., & Khozlu, I. (2022). THE INSTITUTE OF CITIZEN APPEALS AS AN ACTIVE MECHANISM FOR THE PROTECTION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC HUMAN RIGHTS. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(3), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-3-65-71
Article views: 420 | PDF Downloads: 219

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

institution of citizens' appeal, legal mechanism, human rights and freedoms, social rights, economic rights, electronic petition

References

Asher, M., Bandeira, K. L., & Spaicer, V. Hansard society, assessing the effectiveness of e-petitioning through Twitter conversations [Internet; cited 2020 March 6]. Available at: https://www.oidp.net/docs/repo/doc174.pdf

Barnes, S. H., Kaase, M., Allerback, K. R., Farah, B., Heunks, F., Inglehart, R., ect. (1979). Political action: mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Beato, G. From petitions to decision [Internet; cited 2020 March 14]. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Available at: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/from_petitions_to_decisions

Bochel, C. (2016). Process matters: petitions systems in Britain’s legislatures’. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 22(3): 368–384.

Bull, R. (2015). Building a framework for governance: retrospective review and rulemaking petitions. Administrative Law Review, 67(2):265–319.

Carman, C. (2014). Barriers and barriers: asymmetric participation in the Scottish public petitions system. Parliamentary Affairs, 67:151–171.

Carman, C. The assessment of the Scottish Parliament’s public petitions system 1999–2006, commissioned by the Scottish Parliament Information Centre for the Public Petitions Committee [Internet; cited 2020 March 13]. Available at: https://archive.parliament.scot/business/committees/petitions/reports-06/pur06-PPS-assessment-01.htm

Dahlberg, L. (2011). Re-constructing digital democracy: an outline of four “positions”. New Media & Society, 13:855–872.

Datta, P. (2020). Digital transformation of the Italian public administration: A case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 46(11), 252–272. Viešoji politika ir administravimas. T. 19, Nr. 4, p. 52–63.

Dias, G. P. (2020). Global e-government development: besides the relative wealth of countries, do policies matter? Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(3):381–400.

Gerpott, T., & Ahmadi, N. (2016). Use levels of electronic government services among German citizens: an empirical analysis of objective household and personal predictors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(14):637–668.

Gerpott, T., & Ahmadi, N. (2016). Use levels of electronic government services among German citizens: an empirical analysis of objective household and personal predictors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 10(14):637–668.

Hoffman, L. H. (2012). Participation or communication? An explication of political activity in the Internet age. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9:217–233.

Leston-Bandeira, C. A year on, the new Petitions Committee has much to celebrate [Internet; cited 2020 February 11]. Available at: https://constitution-unit.com/2016/07/20/a-year-on-the-new-petitions-committee-has-much-to-celebrate/

Ma, L., & Zheng, Y. (2019). National e-government performance and citizen satisfaction: a multilevel analysis across European countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3):506–526.

Ming, T., Teng, W., & Jodaki, S. (2020). A model to investigate the effect of information technology and information systems on the ease of managers’ decision-making. Kybernetes. Available at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/K-10-2019-0712/full/html

Mosca, L., & Santucci, D. (2009). Petitioning online: the role of e-petitions in web campaigning. In: Baringhorst S, Kneip V, Niesyto J, editors. Political campaigning on the web. New Brunswick: Transaction; 145 p.

Olena Kovalova, Maksym V. Кorniienko, & Yurii V. Pavliutin (2020). The role of public organizations in ensuring national security of ukraine vol. 37, Nº 65 (julio-diciembre), 136-155 Cuestiones Políticas Esta revista fue editada en formato digital y publicada en julio de 2020, por el Fondo Editorial Serbiluz, Universidad del Zulia. Maracaibo-Venezuela. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3865.11

Olena Kovalova, Maksym Korniienko, & Olena Postol (2019). Ensuring of child's dignity as a principle of modern education: administrative and legal aspects. Asia Life Sciences Supplement. Asian International Journal of Life Sciences, 21(2):341–359.

Rosenberg, D. (2020). Ethnic perspective in e-government use and trust in government: A test of social inequality approaches. New Media & Society. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461444820920655

Rot, A., Sobińska, M., Hernes, M., & Franczyk, B. (2020). Digital transformation of public administration through blockchain technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 887:111–126.

Schmidt, J. H., & Johnsen, K. (2014). On the use of the e-petition platform of the German Bundestag. HIIG Discussion Paper Series, 3:1–49.