GEOSTRATEGY OF UKRAINE: A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF BUILDING SECTORAL INSTITUTIONAL-ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 30, 2022

  Volodymyr Lipkan

  Serhii Poteriaiko

  Serhii Mul

Abstract

Structuring the geostrategic landscape entails using integrated modeling methods to expand strategic horizons to forecast the development vectors of political and economic systems. The reasons for the barbarous war of the Moscow regime against the Ukrainian state have a significant basis both for theoretical study and further practical implementation of the obtained data into political and security practices. Examining the cause-effect complex of articulation of destructive paradigms has become the subject of many sciences. However, requiring their completed conceptualization within the political reality, individual phenomena are poorly studied from the standpoint of economic representation in the context of mathematical modeling of institutional implementing strategic national interests in the most crucial areas of life. Thus, public infrastructure policy is one of the reference areas. The development of the geostrategy of the modern Ukrainian state actualizes the task of elaborating precise mathematical models for assessing geostrategic processes, primarily the economic component. Clarifying the economic foundation of the war against Ukraine makes it possible to identify the facts of falsification in the modern political reality of those economic concepts which focus on the genocide of the Ukrainian nation under the guise of the development concept, reform, modernization, integration, etc. The paper articulates the conditionality of referring to the mathematical dimension of geostrategy implementation as exemplified by state infrastructure policy, analyzes the models of rendering political and economic decisions, specifies essential characteristics of institutional structures, and determines the algorithm for selecting experts. The article extends the central author’s idea of a clear distinction between geopolitics and geostrategy. Therefore, mathematical modeling assists in proving the nullity of argumentation and the lack of logical and other prerequisites for implementing Ukraine’s economic policy in the interests of third countries. It is concluded that the scientific study of alternatives to building institutional structures carrying out geostrategy, combined with articulating the economic dimension of their efficiency in the most important areas of life, constitutes an essential layer of political and economic doctrines. They should lay the groundwork for the design of the geostrategy of the modern Ukrainian state outside the context of stigmatization and attempts to rewrite history, semblance of the geostrategic landscape in a space-time format, and imposing destructive economic models on Ukraine.

How to Cite

Lipkan, V., Poteriaiko, S., & Mul, S. (2022). GEOSTRATEGY OF UKRAINE: A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF BUILDING SECTORAL INSTITUTIONAL-ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(5), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-5-58-69
Article views: 269 | PDF Downloads: 163

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

political and economic dimension of geostrategy, economic policy, geostrategy of modern Ukrainian state, mathematical model, development alternatives, economic ideology, Ukrainianness, passionarity of titular ethnic group

References

Afonichkin, A. I., & Mihalenko, D. G. (2009). Upravlencheskie resheniya v ekonomicheskih sistemah [Management decisions in economic systems]. St. Petersburg: Piter, 480 p.

Maliarets, L. M., & Minienkova, O. V. (2017). Vyrishennia problem bahatokryterialnosti v otsintsi diialnosti pidpryiemstva na osnovi metodiv bahatokryterialnoi optymizatsii [Solving the problems of multicriteria in the assessment of enterprise activity based on multicriteria optimization methods]. Problemy ekonomiky, vol. 1, pp. 421–427.

Morozov, O. O. (2013). Bahatokryterialna optymizatsiia skladnykh orhanizatsiino-tekhnichnykh system za umovy nevyznachenosti informatsii [Multi-criteria optimization of complex organizational and technical systems under the condition of information uncertainty]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Akademii vnutrishnikh viisk MVS Ukrainy, vol. 1 (21), pp. 36–40.

Putiatyn, V. H. (2015). Vyibor ratsionalnogo varianta tehnicheskoy realizatsii slozhnoy organizatsionno-tehnicheskoy sistemyi v usloviyah mnogokriterialnosti [The choice of a rational option for the technical implementation of a complex organizational and technical system in a multi-criteria environment]. Reiestratsiia, zberihannia i obrobka danykh, vol. 17(4), pp. S. 71–92.

Tsiutsiura, S. V., Kryvoruchko, O. V., & Tsiuriupa, M. I. (2012). Teoretychni osnovy ta sutnist upravlinskykh rishen. Modeli pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen [Theoretical foundations and essence of management decisions. Models of managerial decision-making]. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, vol. 9, pp. 50–58.

Shtoyer, R. (1992). Mnogokriterialnaya optimizatsiya. Teoriya, vyichisleniya i prilozheniya [Multicriteria optimization. Theory, calculations and applications]. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 504 p.

Linkov, I., & Moberg, E. (2012). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies. CRC Press. Boca Raton, NY, 186 p.

Optimal Complexity Models in Individual Control Strategy Task for Objects that Cannot be Re-trialed / I. Nastenko, V. Pavlov, O. Nosovets, K. Zelensky, O. Davidko, O. Pavlov. 14th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT). Lviv, 2019. P. 207–210.

Alireza Afshari, Majid Mojahed and Rosnah Mohd Yusuff (2010). Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. Vol. 1, No. 5. December. R. 511–16.

Pro Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 27 liut. 2014 r. № 794-VII. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy [About the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated February 27 2014 No. 794-VII. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/794-18#Text

Pro Sluzhbu bezpeky Ukrainy: Zakon Ukrainy vid 25 berez. 1992 r. № 2229-XII. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy [On the Security Service of Ukraine: Law of Ukraine dated March 25. 1992 No. 2229-XII. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2229-12/ed20200703#Text

Danelyan T. Ya. (2015). Formalnyie metodyi ekspertnyih otsenok [Formal methods of expert assessments]. Ekonomika, Statistika i Informatika, vol. 1, pp. 183–187.

Maryicheva, P. G. (2018). Metodika otsenki kompetentnosti ekspertov [Methodology for assessing the competence of experts]. Vestnik Gosudarstvenogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, vol. 4 (60), pp. 29–40.

Azgaldov, G. G., & Kostin, A. V. (2012). Povyishenie dostovernosti rezultatov natsionalnogo/mezhdunarodnogo konkursa: prakticheskiy primer [Improving the credibility of national/international competition results: a case study]. Europe Middle East Africa Members' Meeting. Barcelona (Spain). January. R. 26–28.

Kalinina, I. O., Hozhyi, O. P., & Musenko, H. O. (2012). Vrakhuvannia kompetentnosti ekspertiv u metodakh bahatokryterialnoho analizu v zadachakh ratsionalnoho vyboru [Taking into account the competence of experts in the methods of multi-criteria analysis in the problems of rational choice]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Seriia: Kompiuterni tekhnolohii, vol. 179, t. 191, pp. 116–123.

Podolianchuk, S. V. (2014). Formuvannia kilkisnoho i yakisnoho skladu ekspertnoi hrupy zi stvorennia modeli monitorynhu naukovoi diialnosti u pedahohichnykh VNZ [Formation of the quantitative and qualitative composition of the expert group on the creation of a model for monitoring scientific activity in pedagogical universities]. Mizhnarodnyi naukovyi forum: sotsiolohiia, psykholohiia, pedahohika, menedzhment: zb. nauk. prats, vol. 15, pp. 177–187.

Saati, T. (1993). Prinyatie resheniy. Metod analiza ierarhiy [Making decisions. Hierarchy Analysis Method] [per. s angl. R. G. Vachnadze]. Moscow: Radio i svyaz, 278 з.

Systemy pidtrymky pryiniattia rishen: navch. posib. / [uklad.: S. M. Bratushka, S. M. Novak, S. O. Khailuk] [Decision support systems: tutorial]. Sumy: DVNZ „UABS NBU”, 2010. 265 s.

Lipkan, V. A. (2022). Heostratehiia suchasnoi ukrainskoi derzhavy: zasady formuvannia [Geostrategy of the modern Ukrainian state: principles of formation]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriia filosofsko-politolohichni studii, vol. 42, pp. 268-277.

Lipkan, V. A. (2021). Stratehiia derzhavnoi infrastrukturnoi polityky Ukrainy z pozytsii normatyvizmu [The strategy of the state infrastructure policy of Ukraine from the standpoint of normativism]. Aktualni problemy filosofii ta sotsiolohii, vol. 32, pp. 149-157.