PROVISION OF GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AS A FACTOR IN THE FORMATION OF LOCAL WELFARE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 28, 2023

  Olena Parkhomenko

  Olena Iarmosh

Abstract

The subject of the article is the problem of ensuring the welfare of the population in the context of achieving the goals of sustainable development. The authors define the concepts of "sustainable development", "hromadas" (territorial communities), "welfare", and systematise the prerequisites for the formation of welfare at the local level. The paper aims at developing approaches to determining the priority tasks of territorial development in the system of sustainable development goals. It is noted that sustainable development is impossible without achieving a certain level of welfare. To achieve the research goal, the authors analyses and assesses the level of welfare of hromadas, and also considers a set of indicators for assessing welfare based on a combination of "hard" (objective) and "soft" (subjective) factors. The methodology for assessing the welfare of territories (on the example of Ukraine) and studying its impact on the level of sustainable development of the country is applied. The methodology is based on the construction of a non-linear regression model, which demonstrates the high significance of the factors "number of educational institutions" and "number of cultural and sports institutions". The publication also identifies the main reasons that, according to the respondents, impede the development of hromadas in the region under study: poor quality of education; insufficient public initiative and activity of residents; lack of opportunities for self-realisation and meaningful leisure; poor quality (lack of) road surfaces; unemployment; spread of crime, alcoholism, corruption; environmental pollution; drinking water pollution; deterioration of engineering networks; population ageing; lack of investment; lack of entrepreneurship of hromada residents; lack of hromada awareness; unfavourable conditions for business development. The conclusion of the research is that local and regional plans should provide a systematic vision of territorial development and define strategies based on an integrated and multidimensional approach to inclusive and sustainable development. They should be defined, implemented and monitored with the involvement of key territorial stakeholders in the governance process. Based on the analysis, recommendations will be made to identify territorial development priorities in the system of sustainable development goals at local and global levels. In particular, to establish local priorities, existing local and regional programmes should be reviewed to identify the main needs, priorities, gaps and cross-sectoral linkages of the territory and their relationship with the SDGs and national priorities.

How to Cite

Parkhomenko, O., & Iarmosh, O. (2023). PROVISION OF GLOBAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AS A FACTOR IN THE FORMATION OF LOCAL WELFARE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(5), 206-214. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2023-9-5-206-214
Article views: 307 | PDF Downloads: 128

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

sustainable development, welfare, sustainable development goals, hromada, welfare assessment, territorial development

References

Anand, P. (2017). Happiness, well-being and human development: the case for subjective measures. 2016 UNDP Human Development Report. 36 p. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/anand_template_rev.pdf

Bashshur, R., & Shannon, G. (2009). History of Telemedicine: Evolution, Context, and Transformation, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. New Rochelle (NY). 415 p.

Boarini, R., Johansson, A., & Mira, M. (2006). Alternative Measures of Well-Being: social, employment and migration working papers. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 58 p.

Cheney, G. (2006). National Center on Education and the Economy: New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce.

Delanty, G. (2010). Community. London and New York. Routledge. 205 p.

Goossens, Y., Makipaa, A., & Schepelmann, P. (2007). Alternative Progress Indicators to Gross Domestic Progress as a Means towards Sustainable Development. Brussel: Policy Department – Economic and Scientific Policy (European Parliament). 124 р.

Heraty, N., Michael, J., & McCarthy, A. (2000). Vocational Education and Training in the Republic of Ireland: Institutional Reform and Policy Developments since the 1960s. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 52: 177–99.

Keune, L., Elzinga, T., & Ruyter, T. (2006). Proposal for the Development of a Sustainable and Solidary: macroeconomic outlook. Amsterdam: Attac. 121 р.

Kravtsiv, V. (ed.) (2020). Territorial communities in terms of decentralization: risks and mechanisms of development. Lviv: SI «Institute of Regional Studies named after M.I. Dolishny» NAS of Ukraine. 531 p. (in Ukrainian)

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Еncyclopedia of communication theory. – The USA. SAGE. 1174 p.

Methodological Recommendations for the Consideration of the Sustainable Development Goals in the Development Strategies of the Territorial Communities (2017). Available at: https://www.undp.org/content/dam/ukraine/docs/DG/UNDP_MetRecommendation_v03.pdf

Nisbett, R. E. (2015). Mindware: Tools for Smart Thinking. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Roadmap for Localizing the SDGS: Implementation and Monitoring at Subnational Level. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/commitments/818_11195_commitment_ROADMAP%20LOCALIZING%20SDGS.pdf

Rodchenko, V. (ed.) (2017). Local development: best practices and tools for smart growth. Kharkiv. 212 p. (in Ukrainian)

Ruggeri, K., Garcia-Garzon, E., & Maguire, Á. et al. (2020). Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 18, 192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y

Stiglitz, J. E. (2015) The Welfare State in the Twentyfirst Century. The Welfare State and the Fight against Inequality. 1–24.

Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine. National Report. Available at: http://un.org.ua/images/SDGs_NationalReportUA_Web_1.pdf

Tarasevich, V. M., & Petruni, Y. E. (2013). History of economic doctrines. Kyiv. 352 p. (in Ukrainian)

The Economist Intelligence Unit. Information. Available at: https://www.eiu.com/n/

The Sustainable Development Agenda. Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/

Tomaselli, V., Fordellone, M., & Vichi, M. (2021). Building Well-Being Composite Indicator for Micro-Territorial Areas Through PLS-SEM and K-Means Approach. Social Indicators Research, 153: 407–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02454-0

United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Indices and indicators of human development (2018). Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update_ru.pdf

Wellbeing Survey: Business in the community. Available at: https://wellbeing.bitc.org.uk/