FEATURES OF INFLUENCE OF MACROECONOMIC MEASURES OF TRANSFORMATION ON THE STATE DEBT POLICY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Feb 1, 2016

  Roman Rudyk

Abstract

The objective is to study the relationship between the debt policy and vector of macroeconomic measures which is reflected in the transformation of structure of budget deficiency payments. Also, the article defines and characterizes three main phases of the government debt policy: pre-stabilization, stabilization and post-stabilization. The author analyzes main aspects of the relationship between dept policy and monetary one. Methodology. The study is based on the works of domestic and foreign scientists engaged in research of the given problem. Theoretical concepts are supported by statistical data of key macroeconomic indicators of Ukraine’s economy. Results of the survey showed that the relationship between the debt policy and measures of macro-regulation during the transformation has the stable and permanent nature, and the use of certain instruments of government debt management is exclusively possible for a definite direction of macro policy on the one hand, and they are the elements in the system of measures for its implementation on the other hand. In the pre-stabilization phase of transformation the debt policy synthesizes the expansive solutions of monetary and fiscal authorities, and a direct link between them mediate the expansion of demand in the public sector and the preservation of soft budget constraints for micro-units; in the stabilization phase the relationship between fiscal, monetary and debt policy becomes more indirect, but are direct in that part of the borrowing purposes, subordinated to the creation of macro-stabilization mechanism of transformation; in the poststabilization period the role of indirect interconnection between the debt measures and fiscal and monetary decisions increases, but the lack of a deep micro-restructuring and deep systemic and structural reforms cause the deterioration in the macro-economic state of the system, due to which the vector of government borrowing again gravitates toward the field of formation of the mechanism of stabilization. In the post-stabilization period the following contradictions are especially intensely manifested: firstly, the contradictions between the expansive fiscal policy and relatively restrained monetary policy, which is why the maintenance of the exchange rate and inflation on the equilibrium level takes place with the higher interest rates; secondly, there is an enhancement of contradictions within the system of fiscal policy and monetary policy. The formation of consumer-oriented reproduction proportions of GDP is one of the consequences of such a situation.

How to Cite

Rudyk, R. (2016). FEATURES OF INFLUENCE OF MACROECONOMIC MEASURES OF TRANSFORMATION ON THE STATE DEBT POLICY. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 1(1), 147-153. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2015-1-1-147-153
Article views: 265 | PDF Downloads: 136

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

debt policy, macroeconomic stabilization, monetary policy, investment policy, periods of debt policy, public debt management.

References

Andrushchenko, V. (1999). Western Technology Investment diversification and intensification. Yalta- Foros, Ternopil: TANG: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference “Problems of economic integration of Ukraine into the European Union: investment aspects”, 66-70.

Bofinger, P., Flassbeck G., & Hoffmann, L. (1995) Economics orthodox monetary stabilization: the example of Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan, Problems of Economics, (12), 26-44.

Siedenberg A., & Hoffmann, L. (1998). Ukraine at a crossroads. Lessons from international experience of economic reforms, IL.: Phoenix.

Melamed, M. (1998). Structural relative prices and problems of economic growth in Ukraine: aspects of the analysis. Financial risks. Analytical Review, 2, 68-77.

Popov, V. (1999). Lessons currency crisis in Russia and other mills. Questions of economy, (6), 100-122.

Radionova, J.F. (1999) Macroeconomic fundamentals of roles between the Ministry of Finance and the National Bank. Finances of Ukraine, 2, 10-15.

Sachs, J., Pivovarsky, A. (1996). Economics of Transition. Lessons for Ukraine. Osnovy. The National Bank of Ukraine (2015). Report of the National Bank of Ukraine. Retrieved July, 2015 from http://www.bank.gov.ua/files/stat.pdf

Piotrowska, M. (1998). The Role of Polish Banks in Monetary Policy. Global Trends and Changes in East European Banking. Krakow.