INVESTIGATING MULTICOLLINEARITY BETWEEN COUNTRY’S LEVEL OF DIGITAL COMPETITIVENESS AND INFLUENCING VARIABLES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of scientific research is to identify and argue the connection between the level of digital competitiveness of countries and variable factors, and to propose solutions for its improvement. The object of the research is the level of digital competitiveness of countries in 2023 and the variables that affect it (GDP per capita, population in the country, Digital Quality of Life Index). The subject of the study is the digital capabilities and innovative solutions of countries to strengthen their competitive position in the world in the context of globalisation. Methodology. The study is based on the method of multicollinearity according to the Farrar-Glauber algorithm, which makes it possible to understand the dependence of the level of digital competitiveness on three variable factors (GDP per capita, the number of people in the country and the Digital Quality of Life Index). The method of generalisation made it possible, on the basis of a multicollinear study, to provide recommendations for strengthening the country's digital competitiveness in the international arena, taking into account the potential of human resources, the degree of technological progress and the level of economic development. Results. The research revealed an insignificant relationship between the level of a country's digital competitiveness and GDP per capita. However, it was found that the more economically strong the state, the faster and larger the implementation of digital technologies. It has been posited that there exists a negligible relationship between a nation's digital competitiveness and its population size. Nevertheless, it is evident that as a nation's population increases, there is a concomitant rise in the number of individuals engaged in the production and implementation of innovative solutions and digital technologies. The multicollinearity study demonstrated that there is no multicollinear relationship between the level of the country's digital competitiveness and variable factors. However, it was determined that a country can acquire competitive advantages under the condition of contributing to the increase of the economic well-being of the nation and its accessibility to digital goods and services. Practical implications. The value of the publication is determined by the breadth of the author's recommendations for enhancing the Digital Quality of Life Index of the population, which, in the long term, will ensure the country's competitive position in the digital era and contribute to sustainable economic development. Value/Originality. The contribution of the article to the scientific value consists in the study of multicollinearity using the Farrar-Glauber algorithm to assess the impact on the level of digital competitiveness of such variable factors as GDP per capita (a macroeconomic indicator that indicates the well-being of the nation), the number of inhabitants of the country (an indicator that determines the intellectual potential of the country) and the Digital Quality of Life Index (characterises the accessibility and penetration of digital technologies in the life of society).
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
digital competitiveness, economic growth, human resources, countryʼs gross domestic product, digital quality of life
Baiyere, A., Salmela, H., Nieminen, H., & Kankainen, T. (2024). Assessing digital capabilities for digital transformation – the MIND framework. Information Systems Journal, 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12519
Balcerzak, A. P., Zinecker, M., Skalicky, R., Rogalska, E., & Doubravsky, K. (2023). Technology-oriented start-ups and valuation: A novel approach based on specific contract terms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 197: 122876. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122876
Balcerzak, P. A., & Pietrzak, B. M. (2017). Digital economy in Visegrad countries. Multiple-criteria decision analysis at regional level in the years 2012 and 2015. Journal of Competitiveness, vol. 9, no. 2: 5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2017.02.01
Bui, M.-T., & Le, H.-L. (2023). Digital capability and creative capability to boost firm performance and formulate differentiated CSR-based strategy. Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 3: e14241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14241
Civelek, M., Krajcik, V., & Kljucnikov, A. (2023). The impacts of dynamic capabilities on SMEs’ digital transformation process: the resource-based view perspective. Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 14, no. 4: 1367–1392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.019
Daoud, J. I. (2017). Multicollinearity and regression analysis. ICMAE'17. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, vol. 949: 012009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/949/1/012009
Digital Quality of Life Index 2023 (2024). Surfshark. Available at: https://surfshark.com/dql2023
GDP per capita 2023 (2024). International Monetary Fund. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPDPC@WEO/WEOWORLD
Herediaa, J., Castillo-Vergarab, M., Geldesc, C., Carbajal Gamarrad, F. M., Florese, A., & Heredia, W. (2022). How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the ‘new normal’. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge (JIK), vol. 7, no. 2: 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100171
Jong Hae Kim, M. D. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 72, no. 6: 558–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087
Knudsen, E. S., Lien, L. B., Timmermans, B., Belik, I., & Pandey, S. (2021). Stability in turbulent times? The effect of digitalization on the sustainability of competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, vol. 128: 360–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.008
Kraus, K., Kraus, N., & Manzhura, O. (2021). Digitalization of business processes of enterprises of the ecosystem of Industry 4.0: virtual-real aspect of economic growth reserves. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, vol. 18: 57, 569–580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2021.18.57
Kraus, K., Kraus, N., Manzhura, O., Ishchenko, I., & Radzikhovska, Y. (2023). Digital transformation of business processes of enterprises on the way to becoming Industry 5.0 in the gig economy. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, vol. 20: 93, 1008–1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2023.20.93
Laitsou, E., Kargas, A., & Varoutas, D. (2020). Digital competitiveness in the European Union era: the Greek case. Economies, vol. 8, no. 4: 85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies8040085
Liu, S., Cai, H., & Cai, X. (2023). The paradox of digitalization, competitiveness, and sustainability: a firm-level study of natural resources exploitation in post Covid-19 for China. Resources Policy, vol. 85: Part A, 103773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103773
Lixandroiu, D. (2018). Digital competitiveness indicators and the e-government process in Romania. Journal of smart economic growth, vol. 3, no. 2: 107–122. Available at: https://jseg.ro/index.php/jseg/article/view/47/47
Mlynarzewska-Borowiec, I. (2022). Digital competitiveness gap between the US and EU member states in the 21st century. European Resaerch Studies Journal, vol. XXV, no. 4: 364–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/3087
Saputra, N., Sasanti, N., Alamsjah, F., & Sadeli, F. (2022). Strategic role of digital capability on business agility during COVID-19 era. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 197: 326–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.147
Slavkoviс, M., Pavloviс, K., Mamula Nikoliс, T., Vuсenoviс, T., & Bugarсiс, M. (2023). Impact of digital capabilities on digital transformation: the mediating role of digital citizenship. Systems, vol. 11, no. 4: 172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11040172
Stankovic, J. J., Marjanovic, I., Drezgic, S., & Popovic, Z. (2021). The digital competitiveness of European Countries: a multiple-criteria approach. Journal of Competitiveness, vol. 13, no. 2: 117–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2021.02.07
Sun, C., Lin, Z., Vochozka, M., & Vincúrová, Z. (2022a). Digital transformation and corporate cash holdings in China’s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 13, no. 4: 1081–1116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.031
Sun, C., Zhang, Z., Vochozka, M., & Voznakova, I. (2022b). Enterprise digital transformation and debt financing cost in China?s A-share listed companies. Oeconomia Copernicana, vol. 13, no. 3: 783–829. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.023
Total Population by Country 2023 (2024). World Population Review. Available at: https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries
World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2023 (2024). IMD World Competitiveness Center. Available at: https://www.imd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Digital_2023.pdf
Zhang, L., Qiu, P., & Cao, P. (2023). Does digital transformation enhance the core competitiveness? – Quasi-natural experimental evidence from Chinese traditional manufacturing. PLOS ONE, vol. 18, no. 11: e0289278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289278

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.