APPROACH TO OPTIMISING AND MANAGING WAREHOUSE STOCKS IN A CAR SERVICE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The automotive service industry is characterised by a high degree of complexity and dynamism in its logistics processes. A pivotal challenge confronting the organisation is the effective management of inventory. The maintenance of optimal inventory levels is of paramount importance in ensuring uninterrupted service and minimising the costs associated with storage and delivery. Inventory management is an intricate process that extends beyond the mere maintenance of availability. It necessitates the strategic decision-making process concerning supplier selection, order planning, and resource allocation over time. The present study proposes a model for inventory management in automotive service stations that reflects the complexity of real-world operating conditions. The model incorporates a multitude of suppliers, each exhibiting distinct pricing structures and delivery terms. Constraints are imposed on the selection of suppliers, thereby influencing the overall dynamics of the supply chain. It is important to note that a particular auto part may be available from more than one supplier, with unit prices varying across suppliers and over time. The model operates under the assumption that the demand for each part for each period is known in advance, as are the storage costs, the lower and upper limits on inventory levels, the supplier-specific order quantity constraints, and the initial inventory level at the beginning of the planning horizon. The objective of the proposed model is to minimise the total inventory costs, including purchasing, holding, and potential shortage costs, by applying integer linear programming techniques. The problem is formulated with decision variables representing quantities to be ordered and stocked, and includes a set of linear constraints reflecting all operational requirements. In order to enhance computational efficiency, the model employs heuristic methods to identify high-quality approximate solutions within acceptable time frames. This approach is of particular value in applications where the dimensionality of the problem and the number of suppliers can significantly increase the computational complexity. Empirical evidence has demonstrated the potential of the model to enhance inventory management in practical scenarios. The primary benefits observed include a reduction in overall costs, enhanced delivery coordination, and increased flexibility in inventory planning. These improvements contribute to enhanced operational efficiency and increased competitiveness for automotive service providers. It is recommended that future research concentrate on extending the model to incorporate further real-world factors, including lead times, demand variability, and the capacity to return excess components to suppliers. Moreover, the examination and comparison of disparate inventory management strategies under varying conditions has the potential to yield valuable insights for the optimisation of service operations. In conclusion, the proposed mathematical framework provides an effective tool for the optimisation of inventory procurement and storage processes in automotive service providers. The integration of the precision afforded by linear optimisation with the adaptability of heuristic methodologies signifies the model's practical relevance within contemporary business contexts, wherein enhancing resource efficiency is a pivotal factor in achieving success.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
optimise, inventory management, suppliers, warehouse, auto repair shop, auto parts
Azimov, D., Stoyanova-Asenova, S., Petrova, M., & Asenov, A. (2024). Multi-Criteria Analysis Techniques to Assess the Efficiency of Using Blockchain in Logistics. Economics Ecology Socium, 8, 1–11.
Galligani, E. (2006). The arithmetic mean method for solving systems of nonlinear finite difference equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 181, 579–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.12.052
Georgiev, I., Grozev, D., Pavlov, V., & Veleva, E. (2020). Comparison of heuristic algorithms for solving a specific model of transportation problem. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2302 (1): 060004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0033505
Georgiev, I., Grozev, D., Milchev, M., & Beloev, I. (2022). Optimizing the distribution of labor in car service. AIP Conference Proceedings 2557 (1): 080001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105329
Georgiev, S., & Vulkov, L. (2021A) Fast reconstruction of time-dependent market volatility for European options. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 40(1):30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-021-01422-9
Georgiev, S., & Vulkov, L. (2021B). Computation of the unknown volatility from integral option price observations in jump-diffusion models. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 188, 591–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.05.008
Georgiev, S., & Todorov, V. (2023). Efficient Monte Carlo Methods for Multidimensional Modeling of Slot Machines Jackpot. Mathematics, 11(2), 266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020266
Fapetu, O. P.; & Akinola, A. O. (2008). Optimizing auto-repair practice: Akure Metropolis as case study. AU JT, 11.4: 232–233.
Grozev, D., Milchev, M., Georgiev, I., & Beloev, I. (2022). Analysis of refusals when operating a car service with a non-stationary inflow of requests, AIP Conference Proceedings 2557 (1): 080002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105950
Hassan, K. (2009). A New Quadratic Average Arithmetic Mean (QSAM) Method for Solving Diffusion Equations, Chamchuri J. Math., 1, pp. 93–103.
Kholodenko, A., & Gusak, V. (2022) Initial states and transitional expenses inproduction and transport system optimization. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy. ACCESS Press, 3(3): 292–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2022.3.3(8)
Ma C, Hao W, He R, Jia X, Pan F, Fan J, & Xiong, R. (2018). Distribution path robust optimization of electric vehicle with multiple distribution centers. PLoS ONE 13(3): e0193789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193789
Naoum-Sawaya, J., Cogill, R., Ghaddar, B., Sajja, S., Shorten, R., Taheri, N., Tommasi, P., Verago, R., & Wirth, F. (2015). Stochastic optimization approach for the car placement problem in ridesharing systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 80: 173–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.07.001
Nikolova-Alexieva, V., Alexieva, I., Valeva, K., & Petrova, M. (2022). Model of the Factors Affecting the Eco-Innovation Activity of Bulgarian Industrial Enterprises. Risks, 10(9), 178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10090178
Nykyforov, А., Sushchenko, О., Petrova, М. & Nataliia Pohuda. (2020). Multi-Criteria Technologies for Managerial Decisions System Analysis. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy. ACCESS Press, 2(2): 150–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2020.2.2(3)
Nurprihatin, F., Regina, T., & Rembulan, G.D. (2021). Optimizing rice distribution routes in Indonesia using a two-step linear programming considering logistics costs. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1811, 012010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1811/1/012010
Raeva, E., Pavlov, V., & Georgieva, S. (2021). Claim Reserving Estimation by Using the Chain Ladder Method. AIP Conf. Proc. 24 February 2021; 2321 (1): 030029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0040192
Raeva, E., & Pavlov, V. (2017). Planning Outstanding Reserves in General Insurance. AIP Conf. Proc. 12 October 2017; 1895 (1): 050009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5007381
Raeva E., Mihova, V., & Nikolaev, I. (2019). Using SPSS for Solving Engineering Problems. 2019 29th Annual Conference of the European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE), 1-6.
Rashed, MT. (2003). An extension method for handling integral equations. Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 135, No. 2-3, pp. 73–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00347-8
Shen, Zuo-Jun M., Feng, B., Mao, C., & Ran, L. (2019). Optimization models for electric vehicle service operations: A literature review. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 128: 462–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.08.006
Shopova, M., Petrova, M., & Todorov, L. (2023). Trade in Recyclable Raw Materials in EU: Structural Dynamics Study. In: Koval, V., Kazancoglu, Y., Lakatos, ES. (eds) Circular Business Management in Sustainability. ISCMEE 2022. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23463-7_3
Sundstrom, O., & Binding, C. (2011). Flexible charging optimization for electric vehicles considering distribution grid constraints. IEEE Transactions on Smart grid, 2011, 3.1: 26–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2011.2168431
Tairov, I., Stefanova, N., Aleksandrova, A., & Aleksandrov, M. (2024). Review of AI-Driven Solutions in Business Value and Operational Efficiency. Economics Ecology Socium, 8, 55–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2024.8.3-5
Tzeng, G-H, & Huang, J-J. (2011). Multi-attribute decision making. Methods and applications. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. 350 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11032
Wilson, D. (2015). Strategic Decision Making. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Management – Volume 12 Strategic Management (eds C. L. Cooper, J. McGee and T. Sammut‐Bonnici). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120115
Wilding, R., & Juriado, R. (2004). Customer perceptions of logistics outsourcing in the European consumer goods industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34 (8), 628–644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030410557767
Zhu, J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking. Data Wrapping Analysis with Spreadsheets, 3 ed. United States: Springer, page 420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85982-8

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.