SOCIAL ENTERPRISE FINANCING MODELS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN UKRAINIAN REALITIES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The subject of the present study is the models of financing social enterprises in the national economy of Ukraine under the conditions of institutional transformation and military challenges. Methodology. The methodological basis of the research incorporates a range of analytical approaches, including system and comparative analysis, SWOT analysis, institutional analysis, and case study method. These methods were employed to facilitate an objective assessment of the financing practices of social enterprises. The objective of the present study is to categorise the prevailing models of financing social enterprises, to identify the key challenges to their implementation in Ukraine, and to propose the potential for adapting international financial instruments to the domestic institutional and economic environment. The results of the study demonstrate that the current financing landscape in Ukraine is characterised by short-term, fragmented models, including donor grants, internal self-financing (bootstrapping), crowdfunding, and partially available microfinance. State-supported mechanisms and impact investment instruments remain underdeveloped. Prospective directions include blended finance models, social impact bonds, public-social-private partnerships (PSPP), and targeted fiscal incentives. Conclusion. The development of sustainable financing models for social enterprises in Ukraine is predicated on the institutional recognition of social entrepreneurship as a legal-economic phenomenon. This recognition is to be accompanied by the creation of an enabling regulatory environment, the establishment of national standards for measuring social impact, and the integration of public-private investment tools. It is asserted that social enterprises have the potential to act as drivers of inclusive economic recovery, especially in post-war and crisis contexts. However, this potential can only be realised if financing models are supported by coherent policy, multi-level co-operation, and the engagement of both domestic and international stakeholders. These transformations are imperative not only for ensuring financial viability, but also for embedding social entrepreneurship into the broader strategic framework of national economic resilience and long-term development.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
social entrepreneurship, financing models, social investment, impact investment, blended finance, crowdfunding, bootstrapping, public-private partnership, social innovation, national economy of Ukraine
Akbulaev, N. (2019). Social entrepreneurship: Financial mechanisms and funding opportunities. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 4(3), 121–128.
Armeni, C., & Ferreyra de Bone, D. (2020). Blended Finance for Impact: Principles, Opportunities and Risks. OECD Development Co-operation Working Papers, 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/dedf7e84-en
Bibikova, I., Shafranova, L., & Melnychuk, T. (2015). Financial support for social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 155(11-12), 53–56.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models. Voluntas, 28(6), 2469–2497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7
Gernego, T. (2024). Trends and Focuses for ESG Investment Support: A Cross Country Comparative Analysis. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(1):167.
GIIN (Global Impact Investing Network). (2023). Annual Impact Investor Survey 2023. Available at: https://thegiin.org/research/publication/impact-investor-survey-2023
Gura, O., & Komakha, V. (2025). Legal and economic prerequisites for institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. Economics and Law, 12(1), 45–59.
Kyryliuk, O. (2024). Financial Instruments for Social Entrepreneurship Development in Ukraine: Trends and Challenges. Journal of Social Economy, 1(2), 33–44.
Mulgan, G. (2010). Measuring social value. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer, 38–43.
Nicholls, A., & Pharoah, C. (2008). The landscape of social investment: A holistic topology of opportunities and challenges. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
OECD (2022). Social Impact Investment 2022: The Impact Imperative for Sustainable Development. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/26f3642e-en
Schwartz, S., & Finighan, R. (2020). Impact Investing in Emerging Markets: Models and Trends. Social Investment Forum Reports, 18(2), 29–48.
Sheptytska, M. (2024). Barriers to Institutionalizing Social Business in Ukrainian Public Policy. Ukrainian Journal of Public Policy, 10(1), 61–75.
UNDP. (2022). Financing for Development in Crisis Contexts: Social Economy and SDGs in Ukraine. United Nations Development Programme in Ukraine.
UNDP. (2023). Guidelines for Designing Impact-Focused Public-Private Partnerships. United Nations Development Programme.
USAID. (2024). Ukraine Social Impact Fund Annual Report. United States Agency for International Development. Available at: https://www.usaid.gov/ukraine
Virnyk, O., Kovalchuk, S., & Halaida, I. (2018). Public-Social-Private Partnerships as an Instrument for Community Development. Public Administration Aspects, 6(20), 91–97.
Zagoriy Foundation (2023). Social Entrepreneurship in Ukraine: Mapping and Best Practices. Available at: https://zagoriy.foundation/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.