ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL SUPPORT OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN UKRAINE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 24, 2025

  Roman Holovko

Abstract

The subject of the study is the administrative and legal framework for ensuring economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity in Ukraine. The research focuses on constitutional and legislative guarantees, the role of public administration, judicial protection, and the impact of bureaucracy, corruption, and wartime restrictions on entrepreneurship. Special attention is given to Ukraine’s European integration and the potential of international best practices – particularly deregulation and digitalization – for strengthening economic freedom. Methodology. The methodological basis combines general scientific and special legal methods, including formal-legal, systemic, comparative, and dialectical analysis. These approaches made it possible to examine Ukraine’s administrative-legal mechanisms, evaluate their effectiveness, and compare them with EU standards and international experiences. The aim of the work is to define the essence of economic freedom as a legal and economic category, analyze Ukraine’s administrative-legal instruments for securing entrepreneurship, identify systemic weaknesses in their application, and propose strategies for reform aligned with European Union standards and post-war reconstruction priorities. The results of the study shows that Ukraine has established a multi-level system of guarantees for economic freedom, including constitutional rights, sectoral legislation, administrative procedures, and judicial review. However, excessive bureaucracy, corruption risks, incomplete harmonization with the acquis communautaire, and emergency wartime measures continue to undermine business confidence. International case studies (Poland, Estonia, Lithuania) demonstrate that systemic deregulation, digitalization of administrative services, and institutional continuity can transform administrative law into a driver of entrepreneurship and competitiveness. Conclusion. Administrative law in Ukraine plays a dual role: it can either restrict or promote economic freedom depending on the quality of design and enforcement. Strengthening deregulation, judicial independence, anti-corruption safeguards, and full digitalization are essential for ensuring genuine entrepreneurship. Harmonization with EU law should serve not only as a legal obligation but also as a roadmap for modernization and integration into the European economic and legal space.

How to Cite

Holovko, R. (2025). ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL SUPPORT OF ECONOMIC FREEDOM AND ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN UKRAINE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(5), 334-341. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-5-334-341
Article views: 25 | PDF Downloads: 17

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

economic freedom, entrepreneurship, administrative law, deregulation, digitalization, European integration, Ukraine, wartime governance, economic security

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown.

Aver’yanov, V. (2010). Public administration: Theory and practice. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

Åslund, A. (2022). Ukraine: What went right, what went wrong, and how to rebuild. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Balcerowicz, L. (1995). Socialism, capitalism, transformation. Central European University Press.

Bytiak, Y. (2012). Administrative law of Ukraine. Kharkiv: Pravo.

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2000). Official Journal of the European Communities, C 364/1, 1–22.

Constitution of Ukraine. (1996). Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, No. 30, Art. 141.

Craig, P., & de Búrca, G. (2020). EU law: Text, cases, and materials (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

European Commission. (2023). Ukraine Facility: EU support for recovery and modernization. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu

European Council. (2022). European Council conclusions on Ukraine, 23 June 2022. Brussels: European Council. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu

Freedom House. (2023). Nations in transit 2023: Ukraine country report. Freedom House. Available at: https://freedomhouse.org

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

Heritage Foundation. (2023). 2023 index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation. Available at: https://heritage.org/index

Kolpakov, V. (2011). Administrative law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.

Konstytutsiinyi Sud Ukrainy. (2002). Decision on economic rights (case materials). Kyiv: Constitutional Court of Ukraine.

Kuzio, T. (2023). Russian imperialism and Ukrainian resistance: Nation, identity and war. Routledge.

Margetts, H., & Naumann, A. (2017). Government as a platform: What can Estonia show the world? Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 784–793. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.09.002

Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (2022). Diia: Digital state services during the war. Kyiv: MDT. Available at: https://thedigital.gov.ua

Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press.

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2021). Regulatory policy outlook 2021. OECD Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/38b0fdb1-en

Rohatiuk, I., Ivchenko, B.-Y., Kanfui, I., Solovyov, E., Yermenchuk, O., & Denysenko, O. (2024). Economic security of Ukraine in wartime: Challenges and prospects. SocioEconomic Challenges, 8(3), 123–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.8(3).123-134.2024

Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2020). The Europeanization of Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press.

Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023: Ukraine country profile. Transparency International. Available at: https://www.transparency.org

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. (2012). Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 47–390.

United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022: The future of digital government. United Nations. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1991a). Law of Ukraine "On entrepreneurship", No. 698-XII, April 7, 1991. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, No. 14, Art. 168.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1991b). Law of Ukraine "On investment activity", No. 1560-XII, September 18, 1991. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, No. 47, Art. 646.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2001). Law of Ukraine "On protection of economic competition", No. 2210-III, January 11, 2001. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, No. 12, Art. 64.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2020). Law of Ukraine "On state support of investment projects with significant investments", No. 1116-IX, December 17, 2020. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, No. 8, Art. 60.

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2022). Law of Ukraine "On administrative procedure", No. 2073-IX, November 17, 2022. Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy, No. 27, Art. 245.

World Bank. (2020). Doing business 2020: Comparing business regulation in 190 economies. World Bank. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/32436

World Bank. (2023). Ukraine economic update, spring 2023. World Bank. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ukraine/publication/ukraine-economic-update-spring-2023