Published: Oct 12, 2018


The subject of the study is the evolution of peasant land tenure during the period of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917-1921. The contribution supports the assumption that the Ukrainian revolution of 1917-1921 was a peasant one by its character. The principal agent of Ukrainian history of that period was the peasantry. Peasant revolutionary activity dramatically affected the state of land tenure in Ukraine. It clearly underwent radical changes. The essence of these transformations was the elimination of landlordism and the expansion of the peasant land tenure. The main subject of land relations in Ukraine during the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917-1921 was a peasant landowner. The methodological basis of the study was the concept of the “Great Peasant Revolution”, put forward in the scientific works of V. Danilov, T. Shanin. Its main statements were further developed in the latest developments of N. Kovalev, I. Farenii, S. Kornovenko, and other scholars. Peasant revolution of the early twentieth century laid the foundation of all the revolutionary transformations deploying in Ukraine in the first decades of the twentieth century. A socio-cultural approach is the core methodological benchmark of our study. One of the features of the socio-cultural paradigm is a certain universalism, which makes it possible to study cultural, political, economic, and other elements as a whole, as well as consider society as a unity of culture and sociality. Considering these basic principles, the peasantry at the beginning of the twentieth century appears as a complicated socio-cultural phenomenon where a well-established routine, the land, the work on it, peasants are closely interconnected. The peasantry was the conservative basis of civilization, a specific form of culture, which reminded statehood by the way of socio-cultural organization. Peasant economy was a socio-cultural phenomenon, object and subject of agrarian policy, it occupied an important place in the social division of labour as a peculiar microscope; and most importantly it was the structural component of the Ukrainian revolutionary society of that time. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the evolution of peasant land tenure during the period of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917-1921. The basis of the analysis is the agrarian policy adopted by Bolsheviks, N. Makhno, P. Wrangel. The study of these examples clarifies the evolution of peasant land tenure in the Ukrainian village during the period of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917-1921. As a result of the study, the following conclusions were substantiated. A deliberate policy of liquidation of large land tenure in Ukraine in 1917-1918 by the Soviet authorities was not carried out. Attempts for its implementation took place in Ukraine only in 1919 and were not successful in the end. The Makhnovists were much more effective in their endeavours. Firstly, they did not provoke resistance from peasants of various wealth; secondly, their policy was introduced before the Bolsheviks came to power; and thirdly, their policy was legalized by the relevant decisions of the congresses. P. Wrangel conducted a policy of liquidation of large land tenure in Ukraine in 1920. In its essence, it was similar to the one of Soviet power and Makhno. At the same time, it varied qualitatively from the Soviet one: 1) it had a more thoughtful, systematic, purposeful character; 2) the Government of the South of Russia managed to move away from declarations and eliminated large land tenure in practice; 3) the future of statehood, for which P. Wrangel fought, was clearly linked with the peasantry; 4) he did not identify private ownership of land with large land tenure. The latter was understood as a component of the institution of private land ownership. P. Wrangel believed that possession, use, and disposal of land were the essence of the peasants’ aspirations for land ownership. Therefore, only large land tenure suffered the liquidation.

How to Cite

Kornovenko, S., Telvak, V., & Ilnytskyi, V. (2018). EVOLUTION OF PEASANT LAND TENURE DURING THE UKRAINIAN REVOLUTION OF 1917–1921. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(3), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-3-133-141
Article views: 398 | PDF Downloads: 295



peasant land tenure, large land tenure, peasantry of Ukraine, peasant ownership of land, state ownership of land


DARF – Derzhavnyi arkhiv Rosiiskoi Federatsii [State Archive of the Russian Federation].

DAARK – Derzhavnyi arkhiv Avtonomnoi Respubliky Krym [State Archive of the Crimean Autonomous Republic].

RDVA – Rosiiskyi derzhavnyi voiennyi arkhiv [The Russian State Military archive].

TsDAHOU – Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi arkhiv hromadskykh obiednan Ukrainy [Central State Archive of Public Organizations of Ukraine].

Verstiuk V., Holovchenko V., Ostashko T., Pyrih R., Soldatenko V., Sokalskyi V. (2011). Narysy istorii Ukrainskoi revoliutsii 1917-1921 rokiv [Essays on the History of the Ukrainian revolution of 1917-1921]. U 2-kh kn. Kn. 1. Kyiv: Naukova dumka. 390 p. (in Ukrainian)

Verstiuk V. (2003). Peredmova [Foreword]. Ukrainskyi natsionalno-vyzvolnyi rukh. Berezen-lystopad 1917 roku: Dokumenty i materialy [Ukrainian national liberation movement. March-November 1917: Documents and Materials] / uporiad.: V. Verstiuk (ker.) ta in. Kyiv. P. 5-12. (in Ukrainian)

Verstiuk V.F. (1992). Makhnovshchyna: seliansko-povstanskyi rukh na Ukraini (1918–1921) [The Makhno Ideas: the Peasant Insurgency in Ukraine (1918–1921). Kyiv. 368 p. (in Ukrainian)

Volkovinskij V.N. (1991). Nestor Ivanovich Mahno [Nestor Ivanovich Makhno]. Voprosy istorii [Historical issues]. № 9–10. P. 38-58. (in Russian)

Volkovynskyi V.M. (1992). Batko Makhno [Makhno]. Kyiv: Tovarystvo «Znannia» Ukrainy. 48 p. (in Ukrainian)

Vrangel P. (1992). Vospominaniya barona P. Vrangelya [Memoirs of Baron Wrangel]: v 2-h tt. T. 1. Moskva: Terra. 480 p. (in Russian)

Doklad Tavricheskogo gubernskogo posrednika po zemelnym delam nachalniku upravleniya zemledeliya i zemleustrojstva 4 oktyabrya 1920 g. [The report of the Tavrian Provincial Agent on the Land Issues to the Head of the Agriculture and Land Management Administration of October, 4, 1920] / Agrarnaya politika Vrangelya [P. Wrangel’s Agrarian Policy]. Krasnyj arhiv [Red Archive]. 1928. T. 1. P. 80-93. (in Russian)

Illereckaya E. (1981). Agrarnyj vopros: proval agrarnyh programm i politiki neproletarskih partij v Rossii [The Agrarian Issue: Failure of the Agrarian Programs and the Policies of the Non-Proletarian Parties in Russia]. Moskva: Nauka. 165 p. (in Russian)

Istoriya krestyanstva SSSR. Istoriya sovetskogo krestyanstva (1986) [History of the Peasantry of the USSR.

The History of the Soviet Peasantry]: v 5 t. T. 1. Krestyanstvo v pervoe desyatiletie sovetskoj vlasti. 1917–1927

[The Peasantry in the First Decade of the Soviet power. 1917–1927] / pod red. V. S. Herstobitova. Moskva: Nauka. 455 p. (in Russian)

Kornovenko S.V. (2005). Ahrarna polityka bilshovykiv v ukrainskomu seli v 1919 r. (do prychyn tymchasovykh nevdach) [Agricultural Policy of the Bolsheviks in the Ukrainian Village in 1919 (the Reasons for Temporary Setbacks)]. Ukraina Soborna [The Soborna Ukraine]. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi. Vyp. 2. P. 81-85. (in Ukrainian)

Kornovenko S.V. (2014). Ukrainska revoliutsiia 1917–1921 rr.: selianskyi faktor [The Ukrainian Revolution of 1917–1921: a Peasant Component]. Ukrainskyi selianyn [Ukrainian peasant]. Vyp. 14. P. 142-146. (in Ukrainian)

Kulchytskyi S. (1996). Komunizm v Ukraini: pershe desiatyrichchia (1919−1928) [Communism in Ukraine: the first decade (1919–1928)]. Kyiv: Osnovy. 306 p. (in Ukrainian)

Kulchytskyi S.V. (1992). Komunistychna doktryna i sproby yii realizatsii v Radianskii Ukraini u 1919–1920 rr. [The Communist Doctrine and THE Attempts on its Implementation in Soviet Ukraine in 1919–1920]. Istorychni zoshyty [Historical notebooks]. № 8. 40 p. (in Ukrainian)

Lobachov V. (2001). Byl li batka Mahno anarhistom? [Was Makhno an anarchist?]. Nauka i religiya [Science and Religion]. № 1. Pp. 22-24. (in Russian)

Mahno N. (1929). Russkaya revolyuciya na Ukraine [The Russian Revolution in Ukraine]: V 3-h kn. Kn. 1. (Ot marta 1917 g. po aprel 1918 god) [(From March 1917 to April 1918)]. Parizh. 216 p. (in Russian)

Osipova T. (1990). Obmanutyj klass [The Deceived Class]. Rodina. № 10. Pp. 24-25. (in Russian)

Panchuk A. (2000). Istoriohrafiia Zakhidno-Ukrainskoi Narodnoi Respubliky (1918–2000 rr.) [Historiography of the Western Ukrainian People's Republic (1918–2000)]: avtoref. dys. ... kand. ist. nauk [Manuscript of the thesis ...Candidate of historical sciences]. Kyiv. 20 p. (in Ukrainian)

Pismo Nachalnika Upravleniya zemledeliya i zemleustrojstva Glinki V. A. Maklakovu 16 sentyabrya 1920 g. [The Letter of the Head of the Agriculture and Land Management Administration, Glinka, to V.A. Maklakov, September, 16, 1920] / Agrarnaya politika Vrangelya [P. Wrangel’s Agrarian Policy]. Krasnyj arhiv [Red Archive]. T. 1. 1928. P. 65-68. (in Russian)

Revoliutsiinyi protses 1917–1920 rokiv: vytoky, zmist, znachennia. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats za naslidkamy teoretychnoho seminaru, orhanizovanoho kafedroiu arkhivoznavstva, novitnoi istorii ta spetsialnykh istorychnykh dystsyplin i Naukovym tovarystvom istorykiv-ahrarnykiv 13 chervnia 2013 r. [Revolutionary Process of 1917–1920: origins, content, meaning. Collection of scientific papers on the results of the theoretical seminar, organized by the Department of Archival Studies, modern history and special historical disciplines and scientific societies historians agrarian June 13, 2013]. Cherkaskyi nats. un-t; Nauk. tov. istorykiv-ahrarnykiv [Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Scientific Society of Historians-Agrarians]. Cherkasy: Vertykal, 2014. 62 p. (in Ukrainian)

Ross N. (1982). Vrangel v Krymu [Wrangel in the Crimea]. Frankfurt-na-Majne: “Posev”. 362 p. (in Russian)

Svedeniya ob osushchestvlenii zemelnogo zakona Vrangelya 25 maya 1920 goda k 15 sentyabrya [Information on the Implementation of P. Wrangel’s law on the Land of May, 25, 1920 as of September, 15]. Agrarnaya politika Vrangelya [P. Wrangel’s Agrarian Policy]. Krasnyj arhiv [Red Archive]. 1928. T. 1. P. 61-65. (in Russian)

Semanov S. (2004). Mahno. Sudba atamana [Makhno. The Ataman’s Fate]. Moskva. 320 p. (in Russian)

Soldatenko V.F. (2014). Chynnyk “ukrainskoho khliba” v Hromadianskii viini (1917–1920 rr.) [The “Ukrainian bread” Factor in the Civil War (1917–1920)]. Ukrainskyi selianyn [Ukrainian peasant]. Vyp. 14. P. 156-162. (in Ukrainian)

Trapeznikov S.P. (1976). Leninizm i agrarno-krestyanskij vopros [Lenynyzm and the Agro-Peasant issue]: V 2-h tomah. T. 1. Moskva: Mysl. 567 p. (in Russian)

Farenii I.A. (2014). Pro pravomirnist kontseptsii “Velykoi selianskoi revoliutsii” V.P. Danylova [On the legitimateness of the V.P. Danilov’s concept of the “Great Peasant Revolution”]. Ukrainskyi selianyn [Ukrainian peasant]. Vyp. 14. P. 162-166. (in Ukrainian)

Cvetkov V. (2006). General-lejtenant baron P.N. Vrangel [Lieutenant-General, Baron P.N. Wrangel]. Beloe dvizhenie. Istoricheskie portrety [The White Movement. Historical Portraits]. Moskva: Astrel. P. 346-383.(in Russian)