Published: Oct 12, 2018

  Yevgeny Leheza

  Maryna Savielieva

  Olena Dzhafarova


Experience of developed countries makes the case that it is possible to achieve a high level of competitiveness in the globalized market solely by using achievements of scientific-and-technological advance. National policy and effectiveness of means of scientific sector support used in the country are essential to it. The purpose of the article is an effort to perform the structural analysis of support, regulation, and financing of scientific activity in world’s major economies, having determined central institutes of financial means command for the investment into innovative and scientific activity in the countries. To perform a functional analysis of the funded status of Ukrainian scientific and technological and educational activity from the standpoint of its public regulation. Based on the studied funding model of scientific activity in developed countries, to propose the model of optimization of scientific activity financing that will become the innovative activator of support and development of Ukrainian science. Analysing public policy of developed countries related to the support of scientific, educational, and innovative activity according to the degree of state regulation, it is possible to identify two poles. The first pole can be notionally named as English-American model where the state does very little to interfere with the activity of scientific and innovative sector. It is characterized by the fullest autonomy of entrepreneurship in the innovative and scientific and educational sphere. With the use of such model, it is assumed that market mechanisms facilitate acceleration of scientific and innovative processes of country development by them. The second pole, a Franco-Japanese model of public regulation, is characterized by the substantial impact of the state on scientific and educational processes, in particular, by non-market financing methods. With the use of this model, the governments determine priority guidelines of innovative and technological development supported by the government substantially; such countries to some extent include: France, Sweden, and Japan. Most of the developed European countries (Germany, Poland, Italy) and Canada are found in between specified poles of scientific and innovative policy while developing a national business environment and using direct state support of innovative activity. The increase in expenses of the private sector for research and development activities appears in all countries. Public authorities support scientific studies, innovative activity and development of small and medium-sized businesses in a scientific and technological sphere; they cooperate actively during the development and implementation of national programs. Moreover, other concerned parties – industrial companies, representatives of the academic community, non-governmental non-profit organizations – are involved more actively in the decision-making process. Max Planck Society in Germany can become the experimental model of regulation and financing of scientific, educational, and innovative activity of institutions. Implementation of a new economic model in Ukraine is possible upon the condition of creation and adjustment of the functioning of two closed and related engineering processes: innovative and productive: education-science-production-market; investment. The following may be classified as top priorities of development of scientific and technological activity in Ukraine: prevention of arrival of earlier and inefficient technologies; facilitation of application of state-of-the-art highly efficient technologies, development of scientific potential and human resourcing; arrangement of conditions for extension and expansion in the number of innovative structures (technology parks, technopolis, business incubators, innovation centres, innovative exchange markets).

How to Cite

Leheza, Y., Savielieva, M., & Dzhafarova, O. (2018). STRUCTURAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS OF SCIENTIFIC ACTIVITY REGULATION IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(3), 147-157.
Article views: 394 | PDF Downloads: 300



regulation of scientific activity, funding model, English-American model, Franco-Japanese model, Canadian model, R&D of Ukraine, science financing, Max Planck Society


Bolohib T.M. (2005). Finansuvannya nauky za kordonom [Financing science abroad]. Finansy Ukrayiny. № 4, pp. 46-53. (in Ukrainian)

Danylova I.P. (2014). Zarubizhnyy dosvid derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya naukovoyi sfery: teoretyko-metodolohichni rekomendatsiyi dlya Ukrayiny [Foreign experience of state regulation of the scientific sphere: theoretical and methodological recommendations for Ukraine]. Yuridicheskiy zhurnal: teoriya i praktika. Decembrie. Pp. 79-85.

Kuzhelyev M.O. (2015). Suchasnyy stan finansuvannya ukrayinskoyi nauky: problemy ta perspektyvy [Current state of financing of Ukrainian science: problems and perspectives]. Naukovyy visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Vol. 13, № 3, pp. 129-131. (in Ukrainian)

Lutsenko T.A. (2015). Mizhnarodnyy dosvid derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya nauky ta innovatsiynoyi diyalnosti [International Experience in State Regulation of Science and Innovation]. Teoriya ta praktyka derzhavnoho upravlinnya. Vol. 2, pp. 311-316. Retrieved from: (in Ukrainian)

Martynyuk O.A. (2014). Suchasni mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya innovatsiynoyi diyalnosti [Modern mechanisms of state regulation of innovation activity]. Naukovyy visnyk MHU. Seriya: Ekonomika ta menedzhment. No. 7, pp. 103-107. (in Ukrainian)

Panchenko A.I. (2011). Finansuvannya naukovoyi diyalnosti yak neobkhidna umova innovatsiynoho rozvytku derzhavy [Financing of scientific activity as a prerequisite for the innovative development of the state]. Stalyy rozvytok ekonomiky: Vseukrayinskyy naukovo-vyrobnychyy zhurnal. No. 7, pp. 45-50. (in Ukrainian)

Pro derzhavnyy byudzhet na 2018 rik: proekt Zakonu Ukrayiny (2018) [About the State Budget for 2018: Draft Law of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: (in Ukrainian)

Pysmennyy V.V., Pysmennyy V.I. (2013). Problemy finansuvannya nauky v Ukrayini ta sviti v umovakh formuvannya systemy ekonomiky znan [Problems of financing science in Ukraine and the world in the conditions of formation of a system of knowledge economy]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. № 5, pp. 20-27. (in Ukrainian)

Pro vnutrishnye ta zovnishnye stanovyshche Ukrayiny v 2016 rotsi (2017). [On the Internal and External Situation of Ukraine in 2016]. Shchorichne Poslannya Prezydenta Ukrayiny do Verkhovnoyi Rady Ukrayiny. Kiev. (in Ukrainian)

Stan rozvytku nauky i tekhniky, rezultaty naukovoyi i naukovo-tekhnichnoyi diyalnosti za 2017 (2017). [Status of the development of science and technology, the results of scientific and scientific and technological activities in 2017]. Retrieved from: (in Ukrainian)

Forsayt ekonomiky Ukrayiny: serednostrokovyy (2015-2020) i dovhostrokovyy (2020-2030) chasovi horyzonty [Forecast of the Ukrainian economy: medium-term (2015-2020) and long-term (2020-2030) time horizons]. Retrieved from: (in Ukrainian)

Shevchenko A., Shadura V. (2017). Doslidnytska «parasolka», abo reforma NANU [Research umbrella, or the reform of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]. Retrieved from: (in Ukrainian)

Yadranska O.V. (2007). Zarubizhnyy dosvid derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya nauky: osnovni formy ta napryamy [Foreign experience of state regulation of science: main forms and directions]. Zb. Naukovykh prats DonDUU. Seriya: Derzhavne upravlinnya. Vol. 93, № 8, pp. 63-68. (in Ukrainian)

Max Planck Innovation (2018). Retrieved from: