ECONOMIC TURNOVER STABILITY AS A FACTOR OF MARKET PREDICTABILITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jul 31, 2026

  Oleh Vaskovskyi

  Viktoriіa Rieznikova

Abstract

Subject. The subject of the article is the stability of economic turnover as a complex economic and legal category reflecting the capacity of the legal and economic systems to ensure the predictability, continuity, protection, and recoverability of commercial relations. The relevance of the study stems from the fact that disruption of the stability of economic turnover results in increased transaction costs, deterioration of payment discipline, declining creditor and investor confidence, shorter economic planning horizons, and a weakened capacity of the market to withstand the effects of crises. For Ukraine, this issue is of particular importance in the context of the full-scale armed aggression, the destruction of production, energy, and transport infrastructure, changes in logistics routes, the reorientation of foreign trade, the transformation of commercial legislation, and the country’s deepening integration into the internal market of the European Union. Methodology. The study is based on systemic, institutional, formal legal, comparative legal, and law-and-economics approaches. The systemic approach was applied to establish the interrelationship between legal certainty, the proper performance of commercial obligations, the effectiveness of judicial protection, the efficacy of insolvency proceedings, and market predictability. The institutional approach was used to determine the role of legal rules, judicial and enforcement mechanisms, and crisis-response procedures in shaping the expectations of market participants. The formal legal and comparative legal methods made it possible to analyse the provisions of Ukrainian legislation, the legal approaches of the European Union, and contemporary models of preventive restructuring and insolvency. Official macroeconomic, foreign trade, and business survey data from the National Bank of Ukraine, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and Eurostat were used to substantiate the economic relevance of the category under examination. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to substantiate the stability of economic turnover as an independent economic and legal category, to identify its essential characteristics, structural components, and economic functions, and to determine its place within the interrelationship between legal certainty, market predictability, and sustainable development. Results. The study substantiates the methodological inadequacy of a static understanding of stability as the immutability of legislation or the market environment. It is proposed that the stability of economic turnover be understood as the dynamic capacity of the economic and legal system to maintain, adapt, and restore commercial relations both under normal conditions and in the face of regulatory, financial, security-related, energy, and logistical disruptions. An original definition of this category is formulated on the basis of four interrelated characteristics: predictability, continuity, protection, and recoverability. On this basis, a structure of the stability of economic turnover is proposed, comprising regulatory, contractual and obligatory, jurisdictional and protective, and crisis-response and recovery components. The relationship between the stability of economic turnover and the stability of legislation is clarified. It is established that the immutability of the body of legislation does not guarantee the predictability of commercial relations where contracts are systematically breached, judicial practice is inconsistent, judgments are not enforced, and insolvency proceedings fail to ensure the proper resolution of debt relations. At the same time, consistent and well-substantiated legislative changes accompanied by appropriate transitional mechanisms may enhance the stability of economic turnover. Its assessment should therefore take into account not only regulatory stability but also the actual effectiveness of legal regulation. A functional model of “legal certainty – stability of economic turnover – market predictability – sustainable development” is proposed. Within this model, the stability of economic turnover constitutes an intermediate institutional link through which the quality of legislation, judicial protection, the performance of obligations, and insolvency proceedings affects transaction costs, the behavioural expectations of business entities, and credit and investment decisions. The predictive, transaction-reducing, trust-building (fiduciary), investment, anti-crisis (adaptive-recovery), resource-reallocation functions of the stability of economic turnover are identified. Insolvency proceedings are characterised not only as a mechanism for satisfying creditors’ claims but also as an instrument for structuring debt relations, preserving viable enterprises, terminating economically inefficient activities, and returning assets to productive economic use. Conclusions. It is substantiated that the stability of economic turnover is one of the institutional prerequisites for market predictability and sustainable development. It is not reducible to the immutability of legal rules; rather, it characterises the actual capacity of the economic and legal environment to ensure the proper performance of obligations, effective protection of rights, the preservation of confidence among market participants, and the restoration of disrupted commercial relations. For Ukraine, the practical significance of the proposed approach lies in the possibility of assessing reforms of commercial legislation, the judicial system, enforcement proceedings, and insolvency procedures according to their actual impact on the predictability, continuity, protection, and recoverability of economic turnover in the context of war, post-war recovery, and European integration. Practical significance. The proposed characteristics, structure, and functional model of the stability of economic turnover may be used to develop a system of indicators for assessing the quality of the commercial legal order, to evaluate draft regulatory legal acts, and to determine the priorities of Ukraine’s economic and legal policy.

How to Cite

Vaskovskyi, O., & Rieznikova, V. (2026). ECONOMIC TURNOVER STABILITY AS A FACTOR OF MARKET PREDICTABILITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 12(3), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-3-421-436
Article views: 0 | PDF Downloads: 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

economic turnover, stability of economic turnover, commercial relations, legal certainty, market predictability, sustainable development, resilience, transaction costs, bankruptcy and insolvency, commercial legal order

References

National Bank of Ukraine (2023). NBU Comment on Change in Real GDP in 2022. https://bank.gov.ua/en/news/all/komentar-natsionalnogo-banku-schodo-zmini-realnogo-vvp-u-2022-rotsi

World Bank (2026). Ukraine Macro Poverty Outlook, April 2026. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/d5f32ef28464d01f195827b7e020a3e8-0500022021/related/mpo-ukr.pdf

International Monetary Fund (2026). Ukraine: Request for an Extended Arrangement Under the Extended Fund Facility and Cancellation of the Current Arrangement – Press Release; Staff Report; Supplementary Information; and Statement by the Alternate Executive Director for Ukraine. IMF Staff Country Reports, no. 58. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229040464.002

World Bank, Government of Ukraine, European Commission, and United Nations (2026). Ukraine Fifth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA5), February 2022 – December 2025. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/44369

National Bank of Ukraine (2025). Businesses Remain Upbeat about Their Future Economic Performance, while Reporting Improved Inflation and Exchange Rate Expectations – Q2 2025 Businesses Outlook Survey. https://bank.gov.ua/en/news/all/biznes-zberig-pozitivni-ochikuvannya-schodo-podalshogo-ekonomichnogo-rozvitku-polipshiv-inflyatsiyni-ta-kursovi-ochikuvannya--rezultati-opituvannya-kerivnikiv-kompaniy-u-ii-kvartali-2025-roku

Eurostat (2025). Trade in goods with Ukraine in 2024. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20250507-1

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

Fuller, L. L. (1964). The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300010701/the-morality-of-law/

Deseau, A., Levai, A., & Schmiegelow, M. (2025). Access to justice and economic development: Evidence from an international panel dataset. European Economic Review, vol. 172, article 104947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104947

Kapopoulos, P., & Rizos, A. (2024). Judicial efficiency and economic growth: Evidence based on European Union data. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 71(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjpe.12357

Djankov, S., Melcarne, A., Ramello, G. B., & Spruk, R. (2025). Timely justice as a determinant of economic growth. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 238, article 107235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107235

Aguiar-Díaz, I., Mruk, E., & Ruiz-Mallorquí, M. V. (2024a). How judicial efficiency impacts trade credit and doubtful receivables. European Journal of Law and Economics, 57(1), 63–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-024-09793-0

Aguiar-Díaz, I., Mruk, E. M., & Ruiz-Mallorquí, M. V. (2024b). Judicial efficiency, debt structure, and cost of debt. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(6), 3541–3563. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4207

Mora-Sanguinetti, J. S., Quintana, J., Soler, I., & Spruk, R. (2024). The heterogenous effects of a higher volume of regulation: Evidence from more than 200k Spanish norms. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 65, 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-023-09466-x

The Scholarly Legacy of Academician V. K. Mamutov. https://hozpravoreposit.kyiv.ua/handle/765432198/22

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2025a). Commercial Code of Ukraine: Code of Ukraine No. 436-IV of 16 January 2003; ceased to be in force on 28 August 2025. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/436-15

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2025b). On the peculiarities of regulating the activities of legal entities of certain organisational and legal forms during the transitional period and associations of legal entities: Law of Ukraine No. 4196-IX of 9 January 2025. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4196-20

Ostapenko, H. (2023). The role of legal certainty principle in provision of access to justice in Ukraine in wartime. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 6(3), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-6.3-a000306

Vereshchahina, K. (2023). Problems of legal regulation of bankruptcy during armed conflict. Social and Legal Studios, 6(3), 201–208. https://doi.org/10.32518/sals3.2023.201

Shvydka, T. I., & Ostapenko, Yu. I. (2023). [Features of reforming bankruptcy legislation during martial law. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 1, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.01.35

Acosta-Ormaechea, S., & Morozumi, A. (2023). Bankruptcy costs, idiosyncratic risk, and long-run growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 27(7), 1807–1842. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100522000475

Adalet McGowan, M., Andrews, D., & Millot, V. (2017). Insolvency regimes, zombie firms and capital reallocation. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1399. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5a16beda-en

European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/1023 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt, and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132. Official Journal of the European Union, 172, 18–55. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1023/oj/eng

Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245

Röhn, O., Sánchez, A. C., Hermansen, M., and Rasmussen, M. (2015). Economic resilience: A new set of vulnerability indicators for OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 1249. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxhgjw54r8-en

European Commission (2020). Strategic Foresight Report 2020: Strategic foresight – charting the course towards a more resilient Europe. COM(2020) 493 final. Brussels: European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0493