CONGLOMERATE MANAGEMENT OF ENTERPRISE AS SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEM

Maryna Spivak, Olesia Khokhuliak, Anastasiya Inshyna

Abstract


In modern conditions of political, economic, and social globalization, it is difficult to overestimate for Ukraine the need for research and introduction of new forms of enterprise management. World tendencies of the interaction of business elements are characterized by decentralized integration, in which, preserving their legal and industrial identity, small and medium business is united in economic communities, trying to withstand large monopolistic associations. The modern business environment in the dual model at one pole is represented by corporations, TNCs, MNCs, and at the other pole – by free entrepreneurs (freelancers), the number of which is steadily growing. The contradictions and shortcomings of both poles are harmonized by the intra-national integration of economic interests. New business models of economic interaction arise that require new models and forms of management, require the creation of new, adaptive formats of business interaction that involves the mandatory inclusion of standards for sustainable development (economic, environmental, and social mechanism). Such a new form of management, in our view, can be an innovative model of conglomerate management, which implies not only conglomerate mergers and acquisitions of corporations but also new mechanisms for interaction of small business structures of different economic and sectoral orientation. The terminology and the theoretical basis for studying the conglomerate as a socio-economic system that includes the basic phrase “socio-economic system” were defined. Such a form of organization of socio-economic systems, which would consolidate high competitive advantages, innovative orientation, and significant expansive potential, is proposed. On the basis of generalization of the corresponding theoretical provisions and revealed peculiarities of the formation of spatially localized systems, we assumed that emerging as local “points” of economic growth zones, individual elements or subsystems of enterprises are transformed into territorial production complexes (hereinafter abbreviated as TPC), and then – by implementing the missing infrastructure and institutional components into a variety of cluster forms, into conglomerates. As a result of the research, the following scientific substantiations and conclusions are formulated: 1. For the first time, the term “conglomerate management” was proposed as the aggregate interaction of enterprises united into a spatially localized socio-economic system and a methodological approach to managing such complex structures. 2. A terminology for investigating the purposeful transformation of society and the economy into an additive socioeconomic system is developed. Such studies are especially relevant for the modern domestic economy, which contains controversial characteristics of the deterministic and nondeterministic economic model, as well as poorly predicted agglomerate and synergistic effects. 3. A model for organizing and managing conglomerates of a new type is formed. The architecture of the conglomerate enterprise management model as an element of a socio-economic system with an innovative basis as a priority for the dynamic development of a conglomerate is proposed. 4. We also find it economically sound to create a model of developing the strategic potential of an enterprise as an open socio-economic system, to use the mathematical apparatus of studying models of the fractal type that describes the evolution of a modelled system of fractal objects. 5. A parametric characteristic of the formation of a deterministic model of conglomerate control of a fractal type as a socio-economic system was developed and brought to the form of an economic-mathematical model.

Keywords


complex structured enterprises, socio-economic system, economic growth zone, territorial production complexes, conglomerate, deterministic model, conglomerate management

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akoff R. (1972). Planirovanie v bolshih jekonomicheskih sistemah: per. s angl. [Planning for large economic systems]. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio. (in Russian)

Blonska V.I. (2010). Vdoskonalennia metodyky analizu stratehichnoho potentsialu pidpryiemstva [Improved methods of analyzing potential strategic enterprises]. Naukovyj visnyk NLTU Ukrainy. 20.1, pp. 171-175. (in Ukrainian)

Beer S. (2010). Kibernetika i menedzhment [Cybernetics and Management]. Moscow: KomKniga (in Ukrainian)

Bourdieu P. (2001). Prakticheskij smysl [The practical meaning]. St. Petersburg: Aletejja. (in Russian)

Delokarov K.H. (2000). Sistemnaja paradigma sovremennoj nauki i sinergetika [System paradigm of modern science and synergy]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost – Social Sciences and Modernity. 6, pp. 111-112. (in Russian)

Dobronravova S. (1990). Sinergetika: stanovlenie nelinejnogo myshlenija [Synergetics: the establishment of nonlinear thinking]. Kyiv: Libid. (in Russian)

Zade L.A. (1974). Osnovy novogo podhoda k analizu slozhnyh sistem i processov prinjatija reshenij. – V kn.: Matematika segodnja [A new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision-making processes]. Moscow: Znanie. (in Russian)

Inozemtsev V.L. (2005). Postindustrialnoe obshhestvo kak teoreticheskaja konstrukcija [Post-industrial society as a theoretical construct]. Socialno-jekonomicheskie problemy informacionnogo obshhestva – [Socio-economic issues of the information society]. L.G. Melnika (Ed). Sumy: Universitetskaja kniga. (in Ukrainian)

Kalman R., P. Falb, M. Arbib (2004). Ocherki po matematicheskoj teorii sistem: per. s angl. [Essays on mathematical systems theory]. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (in Russian)

Kalynychenko Yu. (2010). Stratehichnyj rozvytok pidpryiemstva: teoretychni ta praktychni aspekty [Strategic development of the enterprise: theoretical and practical aspects]. Halytskyj ekonomichnyj visnyk – Galician Economic Bulletin, 4(29), 106-115. Retrieved from: http://elartu.tntu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/866/2/GEB_2010_v29_No4-Ju_Kalynichenko-Strategic_development_of_the_enterprise_theoretical__106.pdf (in Russian)

Kochubej N.V., Kochubej R.V. (2005). Sinergeticheskaja metodologija issledovanija socialno – jekonomicheskih sistem [Synergistic research methodology of socio-economic systems]. Socialno-jekonomicheskie problemy informacionnogo obshhestva – Socio-economic issues of the information society. L.G. Melnika (Ed). Sumy: Universitetskaja kniga. (in Ukrainian)

Lekcija: Osnovy modelirovanija sistem [Lecture: Basics of system simulation] (n.d.) life-prog.ru. Retrieved from http://life-prog.ru/1_10724_lektsiya-osnovi-modelirovaniya-sistem.html (in Russian)

Martsinkevich V. (2003). Jekonomicheskij mjejnstrim i sovremennoe vosproizvodstvo [Economic mainstream and modern reproduction]. Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija – World Economy and International Relations, 2, 36-41. (in Russian)

Melnik L.G. (2005). Predposylki formirovanija informacionnogo obshhestva [Background of the information society]. Socialno-jekonomicheskie problemy informacionnogo obshhestva – Socio-economic issues of the information society. L.G. Melnika (Ed). Sumy: Universitetskaja kniga. (in Ukrainian)

Merkulova E.A. (2014). Metodicheskij instrumentarij vyjavlenija tochek jekonomicheskogo rosta v regione [Methodical toolkit to identify points of economic growth in the region]. Socialno-jekonomicheskie javlenija process Socio-economic phenomena and processes, 10 (9). Retrieved from: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metodicheskiy-instrumentariy-vyyavleniya-tochek-ekonomicheskogo-rosta-v-regione (in Russian)

Mesarovich M. (1978 (Ed)). Obshhaja teorija sistem: matematicheskie osnovy [General Systems Theory: mathematical foundations]. Moscow: Mir. (in Russian)

Mykhajlenko M.M. (2006). Stratehichnyj potentsial pidpryiemstva iak obiekt upravlinnia: avtoref. dys. na zdobuttia nauk. stupenia kand. ekon. nauk [The strategic potential of the company as the object management]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv: Kyiv. (in Ukrainian)

Miziuk B.M. (2006). Stratehichne upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: pidruchnyk [Strategic Enterprise Management: textbook]. Lviv: «Mahnoliia Plius». (in Ukrainian)

Prigozhin I. (1986). Porjadok iz haosa. Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj [Order out of chaos. The new dialogue of man with nature]. Moscow: Progress. (in Russian)

Robbins L. (1993). Predmet jekonomicheskoj nauki [The subject of economic science]. Thesis – Thesis, 1(1), 18-19. (in Russian)

Sinergetike – 30 let. (2000) Intervju s professorom G. Hakenom [Synergetics – 30 years. Interview with Prof. H. Haken]. Voprosy filosofii – Questions about philosophy, 3, 54. (in Russian)

Skripnichenko Ju.S. (2011). Subklaster kak forma razvitija prostranstvenno-lokalizovannyh sistem agrarnogo sektora jekonomiki region [Subclusters as a form of spatially-localized systems of the agrarian sector of the economy region]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Retrieved from: http://economy-lib.com/subklaster-kak-formarazvitiya-prostranstvenno-lokalizovannyh-sistem-agrarnogo-sektora-ekonomiki-regiona (in Russian)

Tarasevich V.N. (2005). Postindustrializm postneklassicheskoj nauki [Post-industrialism postnonclassical science]. Socialno-jekonomicheskie problemy informacionnogo obshhestva – Socio-economic issues of the information society. L.G. Melnika (Ed). Sumy: Universitetskaja kniga. (in Russian)

Tarasevich V.N. (2013). Fundamentalnaja jekonomicheskaja nauka XXI veka: orientiry i vektory peremen [The fundamental economic science of the XXI century: Landmarks and vectors of change]. Vіsnik Kiivskogo nacionalnogo universitetu im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Serija: Ekonomika – Bulletin Kyivskoho National University. Taras Shevchenko. Series: Economics, 146. Retrieved from: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/fundamentalnayaekonomicheskaya-nauka-xxi-veka-orientiry-i-vektory-peremen (in Russian)

Uemov A.I. (1978). Sistemnyj podhod i obshhaja teorija sistem [System approach and general systems theory], Moscow: Mysl. (in Russian)

Urmancev Ju.A. (1988). Jevoljucionika ili obshhaja teorija razvitija sistem prirody, obshhestva i myshlenija [Evolution or the general theory of systems of nature, society and mindset]. Moscow: Pushhino: ONTI NCBI AN SSSR. (in Russian)

Cheshkov M.A. (1999). Sinergetika: za i protiv haosa (zametki o nauke jepohi globalnoj smuty) [Synergetics: the pros and cons of chaos (notes on the science of the era of global turmoil)]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost. – Social Sciences and Modernity, 6, 138-139. (in Russian)

Abolafia M. (1998). Markets as Cultures: An Ethnographic Approach. Callon, M. (Ed.) The Law of Markets. – Oxford: Blackwell. (in English)

Polanyi K. (2001). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press. (in English)

Weber М. (1978). Economy and Society: Vol. I. Berkeley: University of California Press. (in English)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-3-295-301

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.