ASSESSING ENERGY SECURITY AND SYSTEM RESILIENCE: EVIDENCE FROM THE GEORGIAN ENERGY SECTOR

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Aug 21, 2026

  Eka Chokheli

  Davit Narmania

  Manana Kharkheli

Abstract

In modern energy systems, energy security has become one of the key priorities, as it directly affects the stability of energy supply, economic sustainability and national security. This study aims to evaluate the level of energy security within the Georgian energy system, considering technological transformation and emerging systemic risks. This research takes a mixed-methods approach, combining systems analysis, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), resilience-based assessment and scenario analysis. A composite Energy Security Evaluation (ESEC) index has been developed to assess the performance of the national energy system. This index incorporates three key aspects: technological and operational resilience, energy dependency and supply diversification, and systemic resilience. The indicators were normalised on a 0–100 scale and aggregated using a weighted composite model. The empirical results show that Georgia's overall energy security level reaches ESEC ≈ 67, indicating a moderately high level of energy security. However, the analysis reveals several structural vulnerabilities, particularly with regard to external energy dependency and supply diversification. A scenario-based assessment shows that digitalising the energy sector and implementing smart energy management technologies could significantly strengthen system resilience. The findings suggest that improving energy security in Georgia requires a focus on energy diversification, smart grid development and modernising digital infrastructure. The proposed analytical framework can also be used to evaluate the energy security of other emerging energy systems.

How to Cite

Chokheli, E., Narmania, D., & Kharkheli, M. (2026). ASSESSING ENERGY SECURITY AND SYSTEM RESILIENCE: EVIDENCE FROM THE GEORGIAN ENERGY SECTOR. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 12(4), 105-111. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-4-105-111
Article views: 0 | PDF Downloads: 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

energy security, systemic resilience, smart grid, energy diversification, Georgia

References

Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2015). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy, 75, 415–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005

ENISA. (2021). Cybersecurity in the energy sector: Threat landscape and good practices. European Union Agency for Cybersecurity.

European Commission. (2020). Digitalisation of the energy system – EU action plan. Brussels.

IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2019). Digitalization and energy. Paris: IEA Publications.

International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). World energy outlook 2022. Paris: IEA Publications.

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2019). Innovation landscape for a renewable-powered future. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). (2020). Smart grids and renewables: A guide for effective deployment. Abu Dhabi: IRENA.

Linkov, I., & Trump, B. D. (2019). The science and practice of resilience. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04565-4

Narmania, D., Chokheli, E., Kharkheli, M., Davitaia, S., Vardiashvili, N., Makasarashvili, M., & Morchiladze, G. (2025a). Assessing household energy expenditure dynamics and energy availability in Georgia. TEM Journal, 14(1), 741–758. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM141-66

Narmania, D., Chokheli, E., Kharkheli, M., Davitaia, S., Vardiashvili, N., Makasarashvili, M., & Morchiladze, G. (2025b). Energy potential and opportunities in Georgia: The context of making Georgia a regional energy hub. E3S Web of Conferences, 635, 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202563501001

NIST. (2018). Framework for improving critical infrastructure cybersecurity (Version 1.1). National Institute of Standards and Technology.

NIST. (2020). Cyber-physical systems security framework. U.S. Department of Commerce.

OECD. (2019). Enhancing the resilience of critical infrastructure systems. OECD Publishing.

Saltelli, A., et al. (2019). Global sensitivity analysis: The primer (updated applications). Wiley.

Seturidze, R., Narmania, D., Maghradze, M., Davitaia, S., & Machitidze, M. (2023). Ways of improving the management of the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) automated system in electric power. International Journal of Development Research, 13(10), 63921–63928. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.27265.10.2023

U.S. Department of Energy. (2020). Grid modernization initiative: Strategy and implementation. Washington, DC.

World Bank. (2020). Digital energy transformation and power sector modernization. Washington, DC.

World Economic Forum. (2019). The global energy transformation: A roadmap to 2050. Geneva.

Zhang, P., Shahidehpour, M., & Alabdulwahab, A. (2018). Review of smart grid technologies and applications. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(3), 1728–1736.