PUBLIC CONTROL OVER PUBLIC AUTHORITIES THROUGH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AS A TOOL FOR REDUCING ECONOMIC LOSSES FROM CORRUPTION: EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE AND PROPOSALS FOR UKRAINE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The article examines public control over public authorities exercised by means of digital technologies as an economic and legal mechanism for reducing corruption losses of the national economy. The relevance of the study is twofold. Firstly, the scale of such losses is considerable; for the European Union, it is estimated at between 179–990 billion EUR of GDP annually. Secondly, it is vital to consider the needs of Ukraine's post-war reconstruction, in which the credibility of accountability mechanisms directly determines the volume and cost of available international financing. The purpose of the article is threefold: firstly, to reveal the dual administrative-legal and economic nature of digital public control; secondly, to assess, on the basis of European experience and verified empirical data, its impact on reducing corruption-related losses; and thirdly, to formulate proposals for improving Ukraine's legislation. The research methods employed encompass the dialectical method, analytical and synthetic approaches, statistical analysis, economic and legal modelling based on agency and transaction cost categories, and a comparative legal approach to EU law, Member States' legislation and Ukrainian legislation. The main results show that digital public control has the characteristics of a public good and economies of scale. One-off public investments in open data reduce the marginal cost of each subsequent act of civic monitoring to almost zero. Meanwhile, e-procurement transparency in Ukraine measurably lowered final contract prices. An effective European model is based on four principles: the openness of data by default; the protection of whistleblowers; the institutionalisation of control outcomes; and the secure design of control platforms. The conclusions substantiate a system of legislative measures for Ukraine, including a framework law on public control, harmonisation with Directives (EU) 2019/1024 and 2019/1937, classification of participation platforms as critical information infrastructure, and legal regulation of algorithmic risk indicators, framed as public investments with high expected returns during post-war recovery.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
open data, e-procurement, transparency, whistleblower protection, e-participation, agency costs, good governance, post-war reconstruction, critical information infrastructure
Abazi, V. (2020). The European Union Whistleblower Directive: A ‘game changer’ for whistleblowing protection? Industrial Law Journal, 49(4), 640–656.
Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399–418.
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271.
Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2025). Prozorro Market Becomes a Driver for Efficient Procurement and Ukraine’s Integration into EU Standards. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/en/news/prozorro-market-staie-draiverom-efektyvnykh-zakupivel-ta-intehratsii-ukrainy-do-standartiv-ies
data.europa.eu (2025). Open Data Maturity Report 2025. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/en/open-data-maturity/2025
Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1024/oj
Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1937/oj
Directive (EU) 2026/1021 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2026 on combatting corruption, replacing Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA and the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1371. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2026/1021/oj
EBRD (2025). The Impact of the Prozorro Procurement System on the Ukrainian Economy. Law in Transition Journal 2025. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. https://www.ebrd.com/content/dam/ebrd_dxp/assets/pdfs/legal-transition/Law%20in%20Transition%20journal/LiTJ%202025/ebrd-lit25-the-impact-of-the-prozorro-procurement-system-on-the-ukrainian-economy.pdf
Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2014). E-government, internet adoption, and corruption: An empirical investigation. World Development, 57, 114–126.
European Commission (2023). Special Eurobarometer 534: Citizens’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2023. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/democracy-eu-citizenship-anti-corruption/anti-corruption/corruption-public-opinion_en
European Commission (2026). Special Eurobarometer: Citizens’ Attitudes towards Corruption in the EU in 2026. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3693
European Public Prosecutor’s Office (2026). Annual Report 2025. Luxembourg: EPPO. https://www.eppo.europa.eu/assets/annual-report-2025/index.html
Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: Cross-national objective corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 155–164.
Hafner, M., Taylor, J., Disley, E., Thebes, S., Barberi, M., Stepanek, M., & Levi, M. (2016). The Cost of Non-Europe in the area of Organised Crime and Corruption: Annex II – Corruption. RAND Europe; European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/579319/EPRS_STU(2016)579319_EN.pdf
Huyer, E., & van Knippenberg, L. (2020). The Economic Impact of Open Data: Opportunities for value creation in Europe. European Data Portal; Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/sites/default/files/the-economic-impact-of-open-data.pdf
Kattel, R., & Mergel, I. (2019). Estonia’s digital transformation: Mission mystique and the hiding hand. In M. E. Compton & P. ’t Hart (Eds.), Great Policy Successes (pp. 143–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843719.003.0008
Kossow, N., & Kukutschka, R. M. B. (2017). Civil society and online connectivity: Controlling corruption on the net? Crime, Law and Social Change, 68(4), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9696-0
Kovalchuk, A., Kenny, C., & Snyder, M. (2019). Examining the Impact of E-Procurement in Ukraine (CGD Working Paper 511). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/examining-impact-e-procurement-ukraine
Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976.
Lewis-Faupel, S., Neggers, Y., Olken, B. A., & Pande, R. (2016). Can electronic procurement improve infrastructure provision? Evidence from public works in India and Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(3), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20140258
Lima, M. S. M., & Delen, D. (2020). Predicting and explaining corruption across countries: A machine learning approach. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101407.
Nam, T. (2018). Examining the anti-corruption effect of e-government and the moderating effect of national culture: A cross-country study. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 273–282.
OECD (2024). Anti-Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pleskach, M., Zaiarnyi, O., & Pleskach, V. (2020). Respect for information rights of a person as a condition for cybersecurity of smart cities residents. 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT), 759–764. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9208977
Randma-Liiv, T., & Lember, V. (Eds.) (2022). Engaging Citizens in Policy Making: e-Participation Practices in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 2 October 2018 establishing a single digital gateway to provide access to information, to procedures and to assistance and problem-solving services. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1724/oj
The Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine “On Approval of the Regulations on Data Sets Subject to Publication as Open Data” of October 21, 2015, No. 835. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/835-2015-п
Sadik-Zada, E. R., Gatto, A., & Niftiyev, I. (2024). E-government and petty corruption in public sector service delivery. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(12), 3987–4003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2067037
The Law of Ukraine “On Access to Public Information” of August 8, 2025, No. 2939-VI. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (BVR), 2011, No. 32, Article 314. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2939-17
The Law of Ukraine “On Transparency in the Use of Public Funds” of 14.06.2025, No. 183-VIII. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (BVR), 2015, No. 16, Article 109. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/183-19
The Law of Ukraine “On Prevention of Corruption” of May 30, 2026, No. 1700-VII. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (BVR), 2014, No. 49, Article 2056. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1700-18
The Law of Ukraine “On Public Procurement” of August 24, 2026, No. 922-VIII. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (BVR), 2016, No. 9, Art. 89. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/922-19
The Law of Ukraine “On the Basic Principles of Cybersecurity in Ukraine” of October 19, 2025, No. 2163-VIII. The Official Bulletin of the Verkhovna Rada (BVR), 2017, No. 45, Article 403. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2163-19
Transparency International (2026). Corruption Perceptions Index 2025. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2025
United Nations (2024). United Nations E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development. New York: UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2024
Zaiarnyi, O. (2025). Cyber risk management in the business strategies of healthcare institutions and compliance with digital patients’ rights: EU experience and proposals for Ukraine in wartime. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1-95-103
Zaiarnyi, O., & Katerynych, P. (2025). Governing smart city development in post-war Ukraine. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue 2025, 186–205. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2025.10
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.