A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF ADAPTIVE MECHANISMS IN INNOVATION-ORIENTED AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Nov 2, 2026

  Tetiana Stroiko

  Iryna Banyeva

  Dmytro Goncharov

Abstract

The war in Ukraine has presented the agricultural sector with an unprecedented combination of risks, including the loss of production assets, climate volatility, supply chain disruption and institutional instability. In such circumstances, traditional models of entrepreneurial resilience, which are primarily designed for peacetime or isolated natural or economic shocks, lose their adaptive capacity. Meanwhile, there is virtually no comprehensive theoretical synthesis of the mechanisms by which agribusiness adapts to multiple simultaneous threats. This article aims to substantiate a conceptual model of adaptive management mechanisms for innovative agribusiness by integrating the theories of dynamic capabilities and adaptive management with institutional economics. The subject of this study is the processes through which agro-industrial enterprises adapt to conditions of institutional instability and armed conflict. The study is based on the systematic organisation and critical analysis of scientific literature on dynamic capabilities theory, classical adaptive management, and institutional economics. It also draws on a synthesis of empirical studies on agribusiness adaptability under various types of shock. As a result, a four-level conceptual model has been developed. This model sequentially combines an exogenous shock in the form of armed conflict with a reinterpreted triad of dynamic capabilities—sensing, seizing and transforming—for wartime conditions. It also incorporates an institutional moderator and the final outcome of 'bounce forward' adaptive resilience. The practical value of the model lies in its potential use as an analytical tool for assessing the preparedness of agricultural enterprises for multiple crises, developing state policy to support the agricultural sector during wartime and the post-war period, and for formulating enterprise management strategies that take into account the quality of the institutional environment.

How to Cite

Stroiko, T., Banyeva, I., & Goncharov, D. (2026). A CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF ADAPTIVE MECHANISMS IN INNOVATION-ORIENTED AGRICULTURAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 12(5), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2026-12-5-71-77
Article views: 0 | PDF Downloads: 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

adaptive management, institutional environment, wartime economy, agricultural sector, entrepreneurial resilience, transformation economy, innovation, agricultural entrepreneurship

References

Global Innovation Index (2023). Innovation for a resilient world. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).

Charbonneau, B., & Giguère, A. (2025). The polycrisis and the uncertainty possibility space. Global Sustainability, 8, e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.9

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088148

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley.

Walters, C. J. (1986). Adaptive management of renewable resources. McGraw-Hill.

Xue, Z., Hou, Y., Cao, G., & Sun, G. (2024). How does digital transformation drive innovation in Chinese agribusiness: Mechanism and micro evidence. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(2), 100489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100489

Corchuelo Martínez-Azúa, B., Dias, Á., & Sama-Berrocal, C. (2025). The key role of market orientation in innovation ambidexterity in agribusiness firms. Review of Managerial Science, 19(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00732-6

Castillo-Valero, J. S., & García-Cortijo, M. C. (2021). Factors that determine innovation in agrifood firms. Agronomy, 11(5), 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050989

Dubinska, I., Irtyshchev, O., & Cherkaskyi, H. (2025). Prerequisites for securing business activities in the conditions of global economic turbulence. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-1-86-94

Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and gyroscope: Integrating science and politics for the environment. Island Press.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001

Williams, B. K., & Brown, E. D. (2012). Adaptive management: The U.S. Department of the Interior applications guide. U.S. Department of the Interior.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E

Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318

Hartono, B., Toiba, H., Putritamara, J. A., & Rahman, M. S. (2024). Do dynamic capabilities, and entrepreneurial orientation promote farm resilience? Insights from Indonesian beef-cattle farmers facing foot and mouth disease outbreak. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 10(1), 2409486. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2409486

Alzate, I. C., López, Y. M., Manotas, E. C., & Boada, A. (2024). Flexibility and adaptability: Dynamic capabilities for building supply chain resilience. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(16), 9749. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd9749

Dyduch, W., Chudziński, P., Cyfert, S., & Zastempowski, M. (2021). Dynamic capabilities, value creation and value capture: Evidence from SMEs under Covid-19 lockdown in Poland. PLoS ONE, 16(6), e0252423. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252423

OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.