REFRAMING HOST-COUNTRY ATTRACTIVENESS FOR FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN POST-TRANSITION EUROPE: EVIDENCE FROM THE VISEGRAD FOUR COUNTRIES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Geopolitical fragmentation, sustainability transitions and digital transformation are increasingly shaping foreign direct investment (FDI). These shifts are not only altering the volume and structure of investment flows, but also the governance frameworks through which states position themselves within global production networks. This article presents a multidimensional framework for analysing host-country attractiveness for FDI in post-transition Europe. Moving beyond traditional economic factors, the framework considers institutional quality, regional integration, geopolitical alignment, environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, digital infrastructure and sociopolitical legitimacy. The article applies this framework to the Visegrad Four to demonstrate how countries with similar transition legacies and EU membership have diverged in their developmental trajectories and strategic positioning. The analysis reveals the various configurations of institutional credibility, geopolitical alignment and innovation capacity that influence the scale, structure and long-term sustainability of inward foreign direct investment (FDI). By situating FDI attractiveness within broader debates on economic governance and global fragmentation, the article sheds light on how states navigate the trade-offs between integration, sovereignty and development, with implications that extend beyond post-transition Europe.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
foreign direct investment, post-transition economies, institutional quality, international political economy, ESG governance, geopolitical alignment
Agarwal, J. P. (1980). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Survey. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 116(4), 739–773.
Aiyar, S., Malacrino, D., & Presbitero, A. F. (2024). Investing in friends: The role of geopolitical alignment in FDI flows. European Journal of Political Economy, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2024.102508
Ban, C., & Adascalitei, D. (2022). The FDI-led growth models of the East-Central and South-Eastern European periphery. In M. Blyth, J. Pontusson, & L. Baccaro (Eds.), Diminishing returns: The new politics of growth and stagnation (pp. 189–211). Oxford University Press.
Bhaumik, S. K., Driffield, N., Estrin, S., & Razeq, Z. M. (2025). Geopolitical alignment, outside options, and inward FDI: An integrated framework and policy pathways. Journal of International Business Policy, 1–18.
Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. (1976). The future of the multinational enterprise. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02899-3
Carstensen, K., & Toubal, F. (2004). Foreign direct investment in Central and Eastern European countries: A dynamic panel analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(1), 3–22.
Chipalkatti, N., Le, Q. V., & Rishi, M. (2021). Sustainability and society: Do environmental, social, and governance factors matter for foreign direct investment? Energies, 14(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196039
Cieślik, A. (2020). Determinants of foreign direct investment from OECD countries in Poland. Eurasian Economic Review, 10(1), 9–25.
Contessi, S., & Weinberger, A. (2009). Foreign direct investment, productivity, and country growth: An overview. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 91(2), 61–78.
Darmo, L., Novák, M., Kálovec, M., & Rybošová, P. (2020). Determinants of the FDI inflow into the Visegrad countries. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, 68(10), 1057–1080. https://doi.org/10.31577/ekoncas.2020.10.05
Dorożyński, T., & Kuna-Marszałek, A. (2014). Investment attractiveness of Visegrad group countries: Comparative analysis. In Geo-regional competitiveness in Central and Eastern Europe, the Baltic countries, and Russia (pp. 239–288). IGI Global.
Dudáš, T., & Grančay, M. (2019). Regional structure of foreign direct investment in Slovakia–a district-level gravity-type model 2009–2016, Ekonomicky casopis, 67 (8), 811–836.
Dunning, J. H. (1979). Explaining changing patterns of international production: In defence of the eclectic theory. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41, 269–295.
Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 1–31.
Eaton, J., & Tamura, A. (1994). Bilateralism and regionalism in Japanese and US trade and foreign direct investment relationships. Journal of Japanese and International Economics, 8, 478–510.
Faeth, I. (2009). Determinants of foreign direct investment – A tale of nine theoretical models. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(1), 165–196.
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
Gokceli, E. (2023). Institutional quality and foreign direct investment: Evidence from OECD countries. Ekonomický časopis/Journal of Economics, 71(3), 222–257.
Gopinath, G., Gourinchas, P., Presbitero, A. F., & Topalova, P. (2024). Changing global linkages: A new cold war? IMF Working Paper. https://www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/wp/2024/english/wpiea2024076-print-pdf.pdf
Götz, M., Jankowska, B., & Talouni, Z. (2023). Reflections on FDI in a post-communist country in the context of EU membership. Post-Communist Economies, 35(2), 134–153.
Götz, M., Éltető, A., & Sass, M. (2023). Still attractive for FDI? Location advantages of Visegrad countries in the digital era – the case of Poland and Hungary. European Journal of International Management, 20(1), 66–88.
Grover, A., & Vézina, P. (2025). Geopolitical fragmentation and friendshoring: Evidence from project-level foreign investment data. World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/099658306232517444
Hassan, A. S. (2022). Does country risk influence foreign direct investment inflows? A case of the Visegrad Four. Economies, 10(9), 221.
Hayat, A. (2019). Foreign direct investments, institutional quality, and economic growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(5), 561–579.
Hlavacek, P., & Bal-Domanska, B. (2016). Impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth in Central and Eastern European countries. Engineering Economics, 27(3), 294–303. http://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.3.3914
Kim, J. H., & Hiatt, S. R. (2021). The effect of sociopolitical legitimacy on foreign firm political strategy. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3224762
Kinoshita, Y., & Campos, N. F. (2003). Why does FDI go where it goes? New evidence from the transition economies. IMF Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451875461.001
Levy, J. S. (2008). Case studies: Types, designs, and logics of inference. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388940701860318
Linsi, L. (2022). Economic narratives and the legitimacy of foreign direct investments. Politics and Governance, 10(3), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i3.5284
Lipsey, R. E. (2004). Home- and host-country effects of foreign direct investment. In R. E. Baldwin & A. L. Winters (Eds.), Challenges to globalization: Analyzing the economics. University of Chicago Press.
Lizondo, J. S. (1991). Foreign direct investment. In D. F. I. Folkerts-Landau et al. (Eds.), Determinants and systemic consequences of international capital flows (pp. 68–82). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781557752055.084
Love, J. H., & Lage-Hidalgo, F. (2000). Analysing the determinants of US direct investment in Mexico. Applied Economics, 32(10), 1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368400404416
Lux, G. (2017). The foreign direct investment driven industrial development model and its limits in Central Europe. Tér és Társadalom, 31(1), 30–52.
Makhavikova, H. (2018). Determinants of FDI in Central and Eastern Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91878-5
Makoni, P. L. (2015). An extensive exploration of theories of foreign direct investment. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 5(2), 77–83.
Mallampally, P., & Sauvant, K. P. (1999). Foreign direct investment in developing countries. Finance and Development, 36(1), 34.
Mihaylova, S. (2020). Foreign direct investment attractiveness of Central, Eastern, and Southeastern European countries: The importance of policy-related location advantages. Croatian Economic Survey, 22(1), 65–101.
Moosa, I. A. (2015). Theories of foreign direct investment: Diversity and implications for empirical testing. Transnational Corporations Review, 7(3), 297–315.
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency. (2024). Shifting shores: FDI relocations and political risk. World Bank Group.
Nayak, D., & Choudhury, R. N. (2014). A selective review of foreign direct investment theories. ESCAP. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/103862/1/782793517.pdf
OECD. (2022). Trends, investor types and drivers of renewable energy FDI. OECD.
Peres, M., Ameer, W., & Xu, H. (2018). The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: Evidence for developed and developing countries. Economic Research–Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 626–644.
Pisani, N., Kolk, A., Ocelík, V., & Wu, G. (2019). Does it pay for cities to be green? An investigation of FDI inflows and environmental sustainability. Journal of International Business Policy, 2(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-018-00017-2
Saleh, A. S., Nguyen, T. L. A., Vinen, D., & Safar, A. (2017). A new theoretical framework to assess multinational corporations' motivation for foreign direct investment: A case study on Vietnamese service industries. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 630–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.007
Schäffler, J., Hecht, V., & Moritz, M. (2017). Regional determinants of German FDI in the Czech Republic: New evidence on the role of border regions. Regional Studies, 51(9), 1399–1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1185516
Solomon, E. M. (2011). Foreign direct investment, host country factors and economic growth. Ensayos–Revista de Economía, 30(1).
Tocar, S. (2018). Determinants of foreign direct investment: A review. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 11(1), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/rebs-2018-0069
Transparency International. (2025). Corruption perception index. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
UNCTAD. (2021). World investment report 2021: Investing in sustainable recovery. United Nations.
UNCTAD. (2025). UNCTAD data center: Foreign direct investment. United Nations.
Wang, J., Yu, J., & Zhong, R. (2023). Country environmental, social and governance performance and economic growth: The international evidence. Accounting and Finance, 63(4), 3911–3941. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13079
wiiw. (2025). wiiw databases Central, East and Southeast Europe. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
Wojciechowski, L. (2013). The determinants of FDI flows from the EU-15 to the Visegrad group countries: A panel gravity model approach. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 1(1), 7–22.
World Bank. (2025). Worldwide governance indicators. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicators
Zhang, D., Masron, T. A., & Lu, X. (2024). The impact of digitalization on foreign direct investment inflows into cities in China. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2330458
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.