Tetiana Galetska, Natalia Topishko, Ivan Topishko


The purpose of the article is to study the European experience of the formation and regulation of socially responsible behaviour of economic entities; distinguishing the dominant drivers of corporate social responsibility in Germany and strategic priorities for its implementation. Its contents are interpreted in the expanded and narrow sense. Expanded approach insists that CSR is a set of interrelated types of responsibility (legal, economic, professional, moral, political, etc.) that reflect the system of values of society. Narrow interpretation foresees the definition of the degree (measure) of adoption by the subject of socially significant goals of society, the fulfilment of mutual rights and responsibilities, observance of social norms. The research subject – the peculiarities of the functioning of the European model of socially responsible entrepreneurship, the practice of its implementation in Germany. The methodology of the research is based on the definition of general principles of constructing the system of corporate social responsibility, disclosure the essence of the categorical apparatus, considering its main theoretical concepts. In the process of research, a set of methods of scientific cognition were used: analysis, synthesis, generalization (for the disclosure of the conceptual-categorical apparatus of the subject of the research); statistical method, grouping, empirical approach (while analysing the practice of distributing social responsibility among the subjects of social partnership in the EU for ensuring social protection of the population, and differences between the EU countries on the level of such responsibility of the subjects of the social process, depending on the model of socio-economic development). Conclusion. Under the influence of the challenges of globalization and the 4th Industrial Revolution, aggravation of competition, the conditions of the economy are changing. The need for business models on the basis of the strategy of sustainable development, socially responsible behaviour of business structures on the basis of systemic and long-term is growing. This situation actualizes the problem of creating mechanisms for maintaining social compromise in society. System of ensuring responsibility of the subjects of society for the formation of normal living conditions of society is one of the institutional mechanisms of social control and creating conditions for balancing personal, collective and social interests. Institutional support for the functioning of the mechanism for supporting social compromise regarding the formation of normal living conditions is based on the levers of state regulation (subsidies, preferential taxation, economic incentives, and compliance with the standards of activity); institute of entrepreneurship (international and national standards for doing business); institute of the public (the system of social reporting of enterprises, work with territorial communities). Compliance with product quality standards, with obligations to stakeholders, social reporting and progress reporting (including its environmental parameters), transparent business promotes the implementation of socio-stabilizing functions of entrepreneurial activity both on national and on a world scale. Experience of European (in particular, German) companies proves the need to adherence to the principles of social responsibility in entrepreneurship and the possibility of their use as a competitive advantage.


corporate social responsibility, sustainable development, Germany, international standards, social reporting, UN Global Compact, corporate social responsibility models

Full Text:



AccountAbility. Retrieved from:

Barannik, L. B. (2011). Sotsialnyi paket yak atrybut suchasnoho pidpryiemnytstva [Social package as an attribute of modern entrepreneurship]. Visnyk KNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, 124–125, 62–65.

BASF Online Report (2016). Retrieved from:

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Harper & Row – N. Y., p. 6.

Bundesregierung. Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BMAS). Retrieved from:

CSR. CSR-Preis (2017). Retrieved from:

CSR in Deutschland. Retrieved from:

CSR in Unternehmen Beispiele. Retrieved from:

CSR Made in Germany. Retrieved from:

Deutsche Post DHL Group. Retrieved from:

Deutsche Bank. Retrieved from:

Fakty pro Nimechchynu: zovnishnia polityka, suspilstvo, nauka, ekonomika, kultura: dovidnyk [Facts about Germany: foreign policy, society, science, economy, culture: reference book]. Retrieved from:

Giving in Numbers (2016). Edition Trends in Corporate Community Engagement. Retrieved from:

Giving in Numbers (2017). Edition Trends in Corporate Community Engagement. Retrieved from:

Herausragende Praxisbeispiele für Soziale Verantwortung der Unternehmen – CSR. Retrieved from:$file/Liste_sozial_engagierter_Unternehmen.pdf

ISO / DIS 26000: Guidance on social responsibility. Retrieved from:

Kirilyuk, N. V. (2015). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist: dosvid yevropeiskykh kompanii [Corporate social responsibility: the experience of European companies]. Molodyi vchenyi, 2(2), 107–111.

Kolosok, A. (2015). Zarubizhnyi dosvid sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu ta perspektyvy yoho zastosuvannia v Ukraini [Foreign experience of social responsibility of business and prospects of its application in Ukraine].

Ekonomichnyi chasopys Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky, 1, 15–19.

Kolot, A. (2013). Suchasna filosofiia korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti: evoliutsiia pohliadiv [Modern philosophy of corporate social responsibility: evolution of attitudes]. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi, 8, 3–17.

Korporatyvnaia fylantropyia. Mezhdunarodnyi aspekt [Corporate philanthropy. International dimension]. Retrieved from:

Mykhailina, Z. (2015). Dosvid sotsialno vidpovidalnoho biznesu: praktyka FRN [The experience of a socially responsible business: practice of the Federal Republic of Germany]. Materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii

«Upravlinnia sotsialno-ekonomichnym rozvytkom v umovakh hlobalizatsii». Ivano-Frankivsk: IFNNIM TNEU, p. 28–30.

Social protection receipts by type (2018). Retrieved from:

The European Sustainable and Responsible Investment Forum. Retrieved from:

The Ten Principles and the Global Compact. Retrieved from:

Topishko, I. I., Topishko, N. P., Galetska, T. I. (2016). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist pidpryiemstva v Ukraini: problemy zabezpechennia ta shliakhy pidvyshchennia [Corporate social responsibility in Ukraine: problems of security and improvement ways]. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii, 12(1), 95–99.

World Economic Forum Annual Meeting (2012). Retrieved from: Economic Forum Annual Meeting (2017). Retrieved from:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.