Maksym Odnorog, Nataliia Kraus, Liudmyla Savchuk


The agrarian market of Ukraine and its basic component, agriculture, is the backbone of the national economy, forms the basis of preserving the sovereignty of the state food and, within a certain range, economic, environmental, and energy security, ensures the development of technologically related sectors of the national economy, and forms socio-economic development of rural areas, therefore, the purpose of the paper is to develop scientifically-based proposals to identify the role of strategic institutions of the agricultural market. Methodology. The theoretical and methodological basis of the research is the dialectical method of cognition and systematic approach, which are used for studying theoretical and methodological foundations of strategic innovation institutes of the agricultural market. The results showed that the article examines the strategic factors that determine the efficiency of functioning of the agrarian market. The results of the monitoring and analysis of the formation of the institutional market environment are presented. There are proposed a model and priority directions of formation and development of systematizing institutions of the agricultural market. Practical implications. The studied institutions create incentives for the development of science and education, encourage the mobility of production factors, facilitate the transfer of scientific and technical information and the introduction of new technologies, promoting entrepreneurship and innovation. Conversely, inefficient institutions reduce the potential level of wellbeing, reliability of property rights, and enforcement of contracts. Value/originality. The increasing importance of innovation institutions of the agricultural market enables you to define the latter as an important intangible factor in the development of the economy and society that create the conditions necessary for the transformation and development of the agrarian market. The system of formation of a modern institutional environment should include a system of regulators, which would provide favourable conditions for attracting domestic and foreign investment, further structuring of the economic complex of the agricultural market, reduction of regional asymmetries of socioeconomic development. How full individual investment units will operate in the institutional environment depends on the realization of economic and social development priorities of the Ukrainian village.


institute, institute of agrarian market, model and directions of formation of market institutions

Full Text:



Andrijchuk, V. G. (2013). Agropromyslovi formuvannja novogo typu v konteksti strategii rozvytku vitchyznjanogo silskogo gospodarstva [Agroindustrial formations of a new type in the context of the development strategy of domestic agriculture]. Ekonomika APK, 1, 3–16.

Bergman, X. (1969). Razdelenie truda i specializacija v selskom hozjajstve [The division of labour and specialization in agriculture]. ( Ju. I. Timofeeva, O. G. Tropova, Trans). Moskva: “Progresc”.

Gajduckyj, P. I. (2004). Formuvannja ta rozvytok agrarnogo rynku [The formation and development of agrarian market]. Ekonomika APK, 3, 4–15.

Grycenko, A. A. (2008). Rynkovi instytuty ta infrastruktura [Market institutions and infrastructure]. Ekonomichna teorija, 3, 53–73.

Jeggertsson, T. (2011). Znanija i teorija institucionalnyh izmenenij [Knowledge and the theory of institutional change]. Voprosy jekonomiki, 7, 4–16.

Zagurskyj, O. M. (2014). Instytucijni chynnyky rozvytku konkurencii na agroprodovolchyh rynkah [Institutional factors the development of competition in agricultural markets]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 3(153), 15–22.

Lopatynskyj, Ju. M. (2006). Instytucionalizacija tranzytyvnoi ekonomiky [The institutionalization of transitive economy]. Nauchnye trudy DonNTU. Serija jekonomicheskaja, 103–1, 15–22.

Nort, D. (1997). Ynstytucyonalnyуe yzmenenyja: ramka analyza [Institutional changes: framework of analysis]. Voprosy ekonomiky, 3, 6–17.

Palmer, T. D. (2014). Moralnist kapitalizmu. Te, pro shho vy ne pochujete vid vykladachiv [The morality of capitalism. What you will not hear from the teachers]. Kyiv: Osnovy.

Rodzhers Everett, M. (2009). Dyfuzija innovacij [The diffusion of innovations]. (V. Starka, Trans). Kyiv: Vyd. dim “Kyjevo-Mogyljanska akademija”.

Sabluk, P. T. (2010). Rozvytok instytucij udoskonalennja mehanizmu reformuvannja agrarnogo sektoru ekonomiky [The development of institutions to improve the mechanism of reforming of agrarian sector of economy]. Ekonomika APK, 10, 3–11.

Shumpeter, J. Teorija ekonomichnogo rozvytku: Doslidzhennja prybutkiv, kapitalu, kredytu, vidsotka ta ekonomichnogo cyklu [The theory of economic development: a Study of profits, capital, credit, interest and economic cycle]. (V. Starka, Trans). Kyiv: Vydavnychyj dim “Kyjevo-Mogyljanska akademija”.

Veber, M. (2016). Hozjajstvo i obshhestvo: ocherki ponimajushhej sociologii [Economy and society: essays on the understanding of sociology]. Jekonomicheskaja sociologija, 5(17), 13–28.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.