AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVENESS FACTORS OF THE REGION’S AGRARIAN SECTOR

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 26, 2019

Abstract

Purpose. The analysis of theoretical concepts of sustainable competitive advantage, the assessment of the competitive advantages of the agricultural sector in the region and identification of the opportunities to provide competitive advantages under conditions of instability as well as a changeable business environment. Results. Two opposite concepts of sustainable competitive advantages’ sources are analyzed. The first one is resource-oriented, the second one – based on the influence of the external environment on the competitive position of the company. It is found out that in modern conditions, the concept based on the resource approach is more adequate for the agrarian sector as the business features in agriculture predetermine the considerable resources’ immobility. In agriculture, due to the specificity of rural settlements, the combination of the basic resources (land, machinery, people) causes a quite rigid configuration that cannot be changed quickly enough. But the resources themselves are not a source of competitive advantage; the ability to use available resources effectively is important. The authors propose a method for comparing the security and efficiency of the basic resources’ usage in agriculture by region. Under the framework of the methods, it was put the index method that allows comparing individual indicators and defining the integral index. The authors used such indicators as energy capacity, tractors and labour resources per one hectare of agricultural land to estimate resource availability. Resource efficiency is characterized by labour productivity indicators (gross production per one average annual employee) and land productivity (gross production per one hectare of agricultural land). The integral indices were calculated based on the geometric mean. There was done the comparative analysis of the provisions of basic resources and the efficiency of their usage by agricultural enterprises of Sumy region, neighbouring regions as well as the average industry indicators based on the proposed methodology. The analysis confirmed the existence of sustainable competitive advantages in the regional context and found that the leading resource is not natural characteristics, but effective management, which provides the highest efficiency of management. Conclusions. Taking into account the rapid changes in the business environment, any competitive advantage can quickly turn from sustainable to unstable. An assessment of the competitive advantages of the agrarian sector in the region has shown that to provide a sustainable position, it is first and foremost necessary to focus on reducing the costs and use innovations. Under conditions of rapid technological change, the main resource is human ones that can produce certain knowledge and innovative solutions. The proposed method of calculation of the integral indicators of resource availability and efficiency of their usage allows evaluating the existence of competitive advantages objectively and can be used both for the development of competitive strategies of agricultural enterprises and the preparation and decision-making at the level of central and regional authorities

How to Cite

Pylypenko, N., Klietsova, N., & Stoianenko, I. (2019). AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVENESS FACTORS OF THE REGION’S AGRARIAN SECTOR. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(5), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-5-128-135
Article views: 814 | PDF Downloads: 640

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

competitive advantage, resource efficiency, agrarian sector, competitive advantage assessment, competitive strategies

References

Pylypenko, V. V., & Pylypenko, N. M. (2016). Naukovo-praktychni aspekty ocinky konkurentospromozhnosti siljsjkoghospodarsjkykh pidpryjemstv [Scientific and practical aspects of the assessment of the competitiveness of agricultural enterprises]. Bulletin of Sumy NAU, 1(67), 73–78. (in Ukrainian)

Ghadzalo, Ja. M., & Zhuk, V. M. (2015). Naukovi osnovy rozvytku aghrarnogho pidpryjemnyctva ta siljsjkykh terytorij za selozberighajuchoju modellju (naukova dopovidj) [Scientific bases of development of agrarian entrepreneurship and rural territories according to the village conservation model (scientific report)]. Kyiv, IAE National Science Center. (in Ukrainian)

Barney, Jay (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. URL: http://www.business.illinois.edu/josephm/BA545_Fall%202011/S10/Barney%20(1991).pdf (accessed 20 January 2019).

Vinayan, Gowrie, Jayashree, Sreenivasan & Marthandan, Govindan (2012). Critical Success Factors of Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Study in Malaysian Manufacturing Industries. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(22). doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v7n22p29 (accessed 17 June 2019).

Barney, J. B., D. J. Ketchen Jr, & M. Wright. (2011). The Future of Resource-Based Theory. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1299–1315. doi: 10.1177/0149206310391805 (accessed 3 March 2019).

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage. New York: The Free Press.

Peteraf, Margaret A. (1993). The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191. URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0143-2095%28199303%2914%3A3%3C179%3ATCOCAA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A (accessed 11 May 2019).

Wernerfelt, B., (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0143-2095%28198404%2F06%295%3A2%3C171%3AARVOTF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-L (accessed 27 May 2019).

Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. H. (1990). The core competencies of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 3. URL: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4391952/mod_resource/content/1/Prahalad%20Hamel.pdf (accessed 8 June 2019).

Grant, R. (1991). The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, (Spring): 114–135. doi: 10.1016 / B978-0-7506-7088-3.50004-8 (accessed 8 April 2019).

Wang, H. (2014). Teories for competitive advantage. In H. Hasan (Eds.), Being Practical with Teory: A Window into Business Research (pp. 33–43). Wollongong, Australia: THEORI. URL: https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1410&context=buspapers (accessed 14 May 2019).

Urlich D., & Lake D. (1991). Organizational capability: Greating competitive advantage. Academy of management Executive, 7(1), 77–92. URL: https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/AME.1991.4274728 (accessed 24 May 2019).

Grant, R. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e8f7/94a511c356a254cc4998f2dc6e4e2c88fcbb.pdf (accessed 11 April 2019).

Mugera, Amin W., (2012). Sustained Competitive Advantage in Agribusiness: Applying the Resource-Based Theory to Human Resources. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(4), 27–48. URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/138318/files/20120017_Formatted.pdf (accessed 29 May 2019).

Hart, S. (1995). A Natural Resource-based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. URL: http://faculty.wwu.edu/dunnc3/rprnts.naturalresourceviewofthefirm.pdf (accessed 14 May 2019).

Yudanov, A. Yu. (2000). Strategicheskie konkurentnye preimushchestva firmy i puti ikh realizatsii na rynke [Strategic competitive advantages of the company and ways to market them]. Personal, 6, 25–31. URL: https://www.cfin.ru/management/strategy/yudanov.shtml

Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky (2019). URL: http://ukrstat.gov.ua/ (accessed 24 May 2019).

Markitanenko, S. (2018). Efektyvni fermery chy neefektyvni ahrokholdynhy? Effective farmers or inefficient agricultural holdings? URL: https://latifundist.com/193-efektivn-fermeri-chi-neefektivn-agroholdingi (accessed 02 November 2019).

Klietsova, N. (2018). Improvement of the Ukrainian Labor Legislation Concerning the Hired Workers’ Employment Protection in the Context of European Integration. Nauchni trudove (University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria), 2, 251–264.