Today, almost every state feels the impact of the financial crisis and is looking for ways to overcome it. It is obvious that the development of economic relations of any state is influenced by taxation, and through taxes, the state has an impact on the property of individuals and legal entities. At the same time, establishing the optimum level of taxation for both taxpayers and the state is an important factor for economic uplift, ensuring the balance of public and private interests in tax and legal regulation, under which there is a proper financial support for the performance of the tasks and functions by the public authorities with reasonable and justified interference of the state in the right of private ownership of persons by means of the taxes. The construction of the tax system, the amount of taxes and their rates should not depend solely on the funds necessary for the state. This process is also influenced by other factors that find their objectification in the relevant principles, because taxation should be reasonable. The purpose of the article is to characterize certain economic principles, which should be the basis of taxation and which should be defined in tax legislation. This will be performed with the dogmatic method, the methods of analysis and synthesis, the systemic method and the case study method. The basis for building the tax system, determining the amount of taxes, the size of their rates, is in the economic factors, which should be taken into account to ensure the effectiveness of taxation and tax regulation as a whole. They have their reflection in the relevant principles as the initial provisions of taxation, acting as fundamental in regulating tax relations. The range of economic principles, which taxation is based on, and the content of which is currently debated in scientific circles, is as follows: proportionality (taxability), cost-effectiveness of taxation, fiscal sufficiency, economic basis of tax, economic justification for tax. They do not exist in isolation from each other, but constitute a clear system, in which their logical connection and influences are traced. Results. Proportionality as a principle of taxation is determined by analyzing the payer's financial position, the actual ability to pay taxes, and the economic benefit he/she receives in the course of paying taxes and fees (the economic result of the payer). The principle of cost-effectiveness of taxation means that the establishment of taxes and fees should be such that the amount of revenues from their payment to the budget exceeds public expenditure and leads to effective taxation (the economic result of the state). The principle of tax sufficiency provides a reasonable restriction on those public needs that need to be met through taxpaying, since these needs cannot be absolute. The principle of the economic basis of the tax indicates source for its payment, which is formed by the corresponding taxation of transactions or other taxable objects. The principle of economic justification for the tax determines the set of relevant factors that allow to approach the characteristics of taxation in different ways, taking into account certain economic indicators, by ensuring that the balance of private and public interests in tax and legal regulation is achieved. In fact, it combines an assessment of compliance with the principles of proportionality (taxability), costeffectiveness of taxation, tax sufficiency, and the economic basis of tax. The results obtained are original, they will allow to improve the normative provisions before consolidating the principles of taxation in tax legislation.
How to Cite
tax, taxation, principles of taxation, cost-effectiveness of taxation, economic basis of tax, economic justification for tax
Blankenagel, A. (2010). Konstitutsionnoye ponimaniye i funktsii ekonomicheski obosnovannykh nalogov – s tochki zreniya spetsialista iz Germanii [Constitutional understanding and functions of economically sound taxes – from the point of view of a specialist from Germany]. Proceedings of the Nalogovoye pravo v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2008 goda: VI mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Russia, Moskow, April 17–18, 2009). Moskva: Statut, pp. 53–65.
Braslavskkyi, R. H. (2019). Pryntsypy podatkovoho prava Ukrainy [Principles of tax law of Ukraine]. Zaporizhzhia.
Evans, C., Freedman, J., & Krever, R. (2011). Preface. The Delicate Balance: Tax, Discretion and the Rule of Law. Amsterdam: IBFD. P. V.
Fedorov, S. Ye. (2017). Pryntsyp sotsialnoi spravedlyvosti podatkovoi systemy Ukrainy yak otsinne poniattia [The principle of social justice of the tax system of Ukraine as an evaluation concept]. Pidpryiemnytstvo, hospodarstvo, parvo – Entrepreneurship, economy, law, no. 10, pp. 160–165.
Gandullia, L. (2012). The role of direct taxes in fiscal decentralization. Available at: ftp://ftp.repec.org/opt/ReDIF/RePEc/gea/wpaper/dwpo-6-sep2012.pdf (accessed March 23, 2020).
Hetman, K. O. (2015). Pravova pryroda fiskalnoi funktsii podatkiv [Legal nature of fiscal function of taxes]. (PhD Thesis), Kharkiv.
Kucherov, I. I. (2009). Teoriya nalogov i sborov (pravovyye aspekty) [Theory of taxes and fees (legal aspects)]. Moskva: ZAO «YurInfoR».
Kucheryavenko, N. P. (2005). Kurs nalogovogo prava (Vols. 1–6); Vol. ІІІ: Ucheniye o naloge [The course of tax law. Doctrine of tax]. Kharkov: Legas; Pravo.
Kuzmenko, V. V., Beskorovaynaya, N. S., & Bagdasaryan, L. Yu. (2013) Ekonomicheskoye obosnovaniye izmeneniy v nalogovom zakonodateltsve. Available at: http://naukarus.com/ekonomicheskoe-obosnovanie-izmeneniy-v-nalogovom-zakonodatelstve (accessed March 24, 2020).
Larionova, A. A. (2015). Sravnitelnyy analyz nalogovykh sistem Rossii i Germanii. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelnyy-analiz-nalogovyh-sistem-rossii-i-germanii.pdf (accessed March 25, 2020).
Macek, R. (2015). The Impact of Taxation on Economic Growth: Case Study of OECD Countries. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276088447_The_Impact_of_Taxation_on_Economic_Growth_Case_Study_of_OECD_Countries (accessed March 29, 2020).
Podatkovyi kodeks Ukrainy (2010) vid 2 hrudnia 2010 r. № 2755–VІ. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17 (accessed March 27, 2020).
Pohrebniak, S. P. (2008). Osnovopolozhni pryntsypy prava (zmistovna kharakterystyka) [Fundamental principles of law (meaningful characteristic)]. Kharkiv: Pravo. (in Ukrainian)
Polishchuk, Ya. V. (2018). Stavka podatkiv ta zboriv: pravova pryroda i klasyfikatsiia [Tax rates: legal nature and classification] (PhD Thesis), Irpin.
Protokol Konventsii pro zakhyst prav liudyny i osnovopolozhnykh svobod (1997). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_535 (accessed March 27, 2020).
Rektsigel, Sh. (2010). Primeneniye Konstitutsionnym Sudom FRG printsipov nalogooblozheniya [The application of the principles of taxation by the Constitutional Court of Germany]. Proceedings of the Nalogovoye pravo v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2008 goda: VI mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Russia, Moskow, April 17-18, 2009). Moskva: Statut, pp. 219–223.
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy (2005) vid 24 bereznia 2005 r., № 2-rp/2005 u spravi po konstytutsiinomu zvernenniu 48 narodnykh deputativ Ukrainy pro vidpovidnist Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen punktu 1.17 statti 1, statti 8 Zakonu Ukrainy «Pro poriadok pohashennia zoboviazan platnykiv podatkiv pered biudzhetamy ta derzhavnymy tsilovymy fondamy». Available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua (accessed March 25, 2020).
Rishennia Konstytutsiinoho Sudu Ukrainy (2004) vid 2 lystopada 2004 r., № 15-rp/2004 u spravi za konstytu-tsiinym podanniam Verkhovnoho Sudu Ukrainy shchodo vidpovidnosti Konstytutsii Ukrainy (konstytutsiinosti) polozhen statti 69 Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy (sprava pro pryznachennia sudom bilsh miakoho pokarannia). Ofitsijnyj visnyk Ukrainy – Official Gazette of Ukraine. 2014. № 45. Аrt. 2975.
Rishennia Yevropeiskoho sudu z prav liudyny (2013) u spravi «N.K.M. proty Uhorshchyny» vid 14 travnia 2013 r. Available at: https://www.echr.coe.int (accessed March 25, 2020).
Sereda, S. G. (2013). Printsip ekonomycheskoy obosnovannosti naloga [The principle of economic feasibility of tax]. Nalogi i nalogooblozheniye – Taxes and taxation, no. 7(109), pp. 483–490.
Shaptala, N. K. (2012). Spivvidnoshennia pryntsypiv rivnosti i sotsialnoi spravedlyvosti v podatkovo-pravovomu rehuliuvanni [Correlation between the principles of equality and social justice in tax regulation] (PhD Thesis), Irpin.
Smit, A. (1962). Issledovaniye o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov [Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of peoples]. Moskva: Sotsekgiz.
William, G. Gale (2014). Effects of Income Tax Changes on Economic Growth. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/09_effects_income_tax_changes_economic_growth_gale_samwick.pdf (accessed March 28, 2020).
Zubareva, I. E. (2009). Printsip ekonomicheskogo osnovaniya nalogov – eto skrytoye oruzhiye nalogoplatelshchika ili deklarativnaya norma [The principle of the economic basis of taxes is a taxpayer’s hidden weapon or declarative norm]. Vash nalogovyy advokat – Your tax attorney, no. 5.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.