THE OPERRA FRAMEWORK: BENCHMARKING INDUSTRIAL ECOSYSTEM VIABILITY TO COMBAT THE "GHOST PARK" SYNDROME

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 29, 2025

  Anton Andriienko

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of "Ghost Park" syndrome, which occurs when industrial parks and special economic zones are legally established yet fail to evolve into fully functioning industrial ecosystems. The subject of the present study is the viability of industrial ecosystems in fragile and high-risk environments, with a particular focus on how policy makers, development finance institutions, and investors can distinguish viable parks from those that are likely to become Ghost Parks. The objective of the research is to develop an integrated assessment framework that captures not only planned inputs, but also real operational performance, resilience and social outcomes. The overarching aim is to support evidence-based industrial policy and investment decisions. The methodology combines conceptual systematisation of existing approaches to zone evaluation with a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making model. The study develops the OPERRA framework, which comprises the following six dimensions: Operational Performance, Plug-and-Play Readiness, Economic Vibrancy, Risk and Security Management, Resource and Climate Resilience, and Social and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Adaptation. Hierarchical decomposition is then applied to translate these dimensions into measurable criteria and indicators. The Analytic Hierarchy Process is used to identify and combine stakeholder preferences regarding these criteria. TOPSIS is then employed to benchmark and rank industrial parks according to how close they are to an ideal operational and resilience profile, and how far they are from a Ghost Park profile. This methodological design enables the incorporation of factors such as actual occupancy, job density, infrastructure readiness, security, governance, and disaster risk management into a single, transparent assessment tool. The study concludes that the outcomes of Ghost Parks are rarely accidental. This usually occurs when the authorities rely on optimistic planning assumptions, focus on land designation and tax incentives, and underestimate the importance of credible infrastructure commitments, security, climate resilience, and social integration. In contrast, parks that perform well under the OPERRA framework demonstrate a combination of credible sunk-cost signals, robust institutional arrangements, reliable plug-and-play services and strong links to labour markets and local communities. The article demonstrates that the long-term viability of industrial ecosystems depends less on formal status and projected investment volumes, and more on verifiable performance and resilience. The main conclusion is that the OPERRA framework can be used as a practical tool for the ex-ante screening and ex-post monitoring of industrial ecosystems, helping to prevent the creation of new ghost parks and prioritise scarce public resources.

How to Cite

Andriienko, A. (2025). THE OPERRA FRAMEWORK: BENCHMARKING INDUSTRIAL ECOSYSTEM VIABILITY TO COMBAT THE "GHOST PARK" SYNDROME. Three Seas Economic Journal, 6(4), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5150/2025-4-2
Article views: 16 | PDF Downloads: 8

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

industrial ecosystem benchmarking, multi-criteria decision-making, institutional resilience, plug-and-play infrastructure, land-use efficiency, non-market risk assessment, climate and disaster resilience, investment signaling mechanisms

References

Agarwal, S. (2024). Industrial revolution 2.0: How plug-and-play parks will drive innovation and efficiency in India’s industrial sector. Manufacturing Today India. Available at: https://www.manufacturingtodayindia.com/industrial-revolution-2-0-how-plug-and-play-parks-will-drive-innovation-and-efficiency-in-indias-industrial-sector

Chen, T., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Wu, B., & Xu, G. (2025). Does urban density always boost smart productivity? Evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship in Chinese cities. PLOS ONE, 20(6), e0326606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326606

De Weijer, F. (2011). With an eye on Afghanistan: A systems perspective on institutional change. Center for International Development, Harvard Kennedy School.

District Council of Yankalilla. (2022, July 12). Special Council Meeting Agenda [PDF]. Available at: https://www.yankalilla.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0037/1176778/Special-Council-Meeting-Agenda-12-July-2022.pdf

Egusquiza, A., Gandini, A., Usobiaga, E., & Barrientos, F. (2020). KPIs Definition and Evaluation Procedures (Deliverable 4.1) [Report from the RURITAGE Project]. European Commission (H2020).

Feltynowski, M., Rzeńca, A., Rzeńca, P., & Wróblewski, W. (2023). AHP and TOPSIS as methods assessing the attractiveness of urban parks: The case of Lodz, Poland. European Spatial Research and Policy, 30(1), 145–169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/1231-1952.30.1.07

Global Infrastructure Hub. (n.d.). Industrial Park PPP Risk Allocation Tool [Interactive tool]. Available at: https://ppp-risk.gihub.org/risk-allocation-matrix/other/industrial-park/

HIDS – Unicamp. (2021, September). Benchmarking global innovation ecosystems: Job creation per capita income and economic vitality [Report PR-04948]. HIDS – Unicamp.

Hrytsenko, L., Derkach, L., Hedegaard, M., & Vaarst, K. (2025). Foreign Direct Investment in Wartime: Factors, Consequences and Recovery. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 14(3), 168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2025.v14n3p168

International Finance Corporation (IFC). (2023). Changing foreign direct investment dynamics and policy responses. World Bank Group.

Kumar, R. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of MCDM Methods, Applications, and Emerging Trends. Decision Making Advances, 3(1), 185–199.

Kurlat, P., & Scheuer, F. (2021). Signalling to Experts. The Review of Economic Studies, 88(2), 800–850. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa068

McKinsey & Company. (2024). The infrastructure moment: Global trends and challenges.

Parker, R., Lewis, R., Moore, T., & Kato, K. (2015). Analysis of Land Use Efficiency in Oregon Cities: A Report to the HB 2254 Rules Advisory Committee. Community Service Center.

Park, C., Son, M., Kim, J., Kim, B., Ahn, Y., & Kwon, N. (2025). TOPSIS and AHP-Based Park, C., Son, M., Kim, J., Kim, B., Ahn, Y., & Kwon, N. (2025). TOPSIS and AHP-Based Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Redevelopment in Old Residential Projects. Sustainability, 17(15), 7072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157072

Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, T. (2021, May). National assessment of job creation and economic benefits for environmentally beneficial investments Phase 2 report [Technical report].

S&P Global Ratings. (2022). ESG Materiality Map: Transportation Infrastructure [Report]. Available at: https://www.marketplace.spglobal.com/en/datasets

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP. (2014). Project operating agreement for the leasing of student housing (Phase I) between the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia and Concessionaire [Unpublished legal draft].

Tighnavard Balasbaneh, A., Aldrovandi, S., & Sher, W. (2025). A Systematic Review of Implementing Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Approaches for the Circular Economy and Cost Assessment. Sustainability, 17(11), 5007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115007

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2001). The role of economic dimension in conflict prevention [A UNECE-OCSE Colloquium].

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2019). International guidelines for industrial parks. UNIDO.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). (2022). Industrial park course manual: Planning and management in the developing world. UNIDO.

UNIDO, World Bank Group, & GIZ. (2021). An international framework for eco-industrial parks (v2.0). UNIDO.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR.

United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER). (2020). Solutions for designing better special economic zones programmes in Africa (Research Brief 2020/3). Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

Welch, A. C. (2011). Security sector reform and the confusion and competition nexus: The case of Kosovo [Doctoral dissertation, University of Portsmouth].

World Bank. (2017). Industrial clusters and micro and small enterprises in Africa: From survival to growth. World Bank.

World Bank Group. (2020). World Bank Group strategy for fragility, conflict, and violence 2020–2025. World Bank Group.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2016). The critical role of business in finding ways to minimize fragility in violence-affected societies. World Economic Forum.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2024). Beyond cost: Country readiness for the future of manufacturing and supply chains. World Economic Forum.

Xu, M., Luo, Y., & Li, D. (2024). Research on Evaluation of City–Industry Integration in Industrial Parks. Sustainability, 16(16), 6906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166906