Alexander Baykov


The article analyzes equally important both for philosophy and law issues of rationality, considers the categories of reasonableness of private law, their role and significance in the legal regulation. The relevance of the study is determined by the lack of clear criteria for determining the nature and character of these categories, by the diversity of understanding of their content, role and significance in the process of legal regulation. The purpose of the study is to establish the nature, interconnection and interdependence of rationality, reasonableness of private law, show how they differ from close-by categories of justice, fairness, legality and appropriateness. In this regard, the study used system-logical, formal-dogmatic, functional, comparative-legal research methods. The study draws attention to the essential differences between rationality and reasonableness, which today are often identified, specifies clear relationship of reasonableness, justice and fairness, and at the same time emphasizes their autonomy, synonymy of rationality, meanings underlines the criteria of rationality and reasonableness, emphasizes the irreducibility of reasonableness to the legitimacy, highlights the signs inherent to reasonableness, which are appropriateness and legitimacy. Reasonableness is not only a subjective category, but also, above all, is a requirement objectively expressed in positive law, addressed to all the participants regulated by the law of public relations, i.e., an objective category. In its turn, certainty of the law is expressed as its reasonableness. The study traces the manifestation of reasonableness category in the international legal acts and normative legal acts of a number of national legal orders.

How to Cite

Baykov, A. (2021). RATIONALITY CATEGORY OF PRIVATE LAW. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2021-1-3
Article views: 30 | PDF Downloads: 16



rationality, reasonableness, appropriateness, justice, fairness, legitimacy

Antonov M. V. (2014) Rationality in law. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. No 3. Pp. 198 – 208.
Bauman Z. (2005) Individualized society. Moscow: Logos.
Baytin M. I. (2001) Essence of law. Saratov: Saratov State Academy of Law.
Bayitin M. I. (2005) Essence of law modern normative legal understanding on the verge of two centuries. Moscow: LLC PH «Law and state».
Belov V. (1998) Conscientiousness, reasonableness, justice as principles of civil law. – Legislation. No. 8. Pp. 49-52.
Borisova L. V. (2008) The principle of reasonableness in Russian civil process: textbook for universities. Moscow: UNITY-DANA: Legal act and law.
Chestnov I. L. (2002) Law understanding in the postmodern era. – Pravovedenie. No. 2. Pp. 44-56.
Chestnov I. L. (2007) Postclassical methodology in jurisprudence. – Modern research methods in jurisprudence / ed. by N. I. Matuzova and A.V. Malko. Saratov: Saratov Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Federation.
Chestnov I. L. (2012) Postclassical theory of law. Monograph. Saint-Petersburg: “Alef-Press” Publishing House.
Davydov Y. N. (1996) M. Weber and the problem of interpretation of rationality. – Questions of sociology. Edition 6. Pp. 71-77.
Fromm E. (1986) To Have or to be? Moscow: Progress.
Habermas J. (2000) Moral consciousness and communicative action. Saint-Petersburg: Science.
Heffe O., V.S. Malakhov V.S., Filatova V.T. (eds.) (2009) Modern Western philosophy. Encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Cultural revolution.
Hegel G. F. V. (1974) Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 1. The science of logic. Moscow: Publishing House "Mysl".
Hegel G. V. F. (1990) Philosophy of law. Moscow: Mysl’.
Hegel G. V. F. (1956) Philosophy of the spirit.Vol. III. Part 3. Moscow: State publishing house of political literature.
Hume D. (1965) Treatise on human nature, or an attempt to apply an experience-based method of reasoning to moral subjects. – Essays. Vol. 1. Moscow: Thought.
Hübner K. (1994) Critique of scientific reason / ed. by V. N. Porus. Moscow: Institute of philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Ivanova S. A. (2005) Some problems of implementation of the principle of social justice, reasonableness and conscientiousness in civil law. – Legislation and Economics. No. 4. Pp. 43-46.
Kant I. (1964) Critique of pure reason. – Essays. Vol. 3. Moscow: Mysl’ Publishing House.
Kasavin I.T., Porus V. N. (eds.) (2009) Communicative rationality. The epistemological approach. Moscow: IF RAN.
Kasavin I.T., Porus V. N. (2009) Introduction. – I.T. Kasavin, V.N. Porus (eds.) Communicative rationality. The epistemological approach. Moscow: IF RAN.
Kistyakovsky B. A. (1999) Philosophy and sociology of law. Saint-Petersburg: Publishing house of the Russian Christian humanitarian Institute.
Kolesov B.V. (ed.) (1990) Domostroy. Moscow: Soviet Russia.
Kopnin P.V. (1973) Dialectics as logic and theory of knowledge. Experience of logical-epistemological research. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.
Kopnin P.V. (1968) On the rational and irrational. – Questions of philosophy. No. 5. P. 112-121.
Lebedev V. M. (2000) Formation and development of the judicial power in Russian Federation. Moscow: Russian Academy of Justice.
Maltsev G.V. (2011) Social foundations of law. – Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M.
Maltsev G. V. (1999) Understanding of law. Approaches and problems. Moscow: Prometheus.
Markov B. V. (2000) Morals and reason. – Afterword to the book: Habermas J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Moscow: Nauka.
Mudragey N.S. (1996) Rational-irrational: interaction and opposition. – Historical types of rationality. Moscow: IF RAN. Pp. 71-87.
Muromtsev S. (1893) Law and justice. – Collection of jurisprudence and public knowledge. The Law Society, which is affiliated with the Imperial Moscow University. Saint-Petersburg: Printing house of M. M. Stasyulevich.
Nersesyants V. S. (1983) Law and legal act. From the history of legal doctrines. Moscow: «Nauka».
Nikiforov A. L. (ed.) (2008) The concept of truth in socio-humanitarian knowledge. Moscow: IF RAN.
Nikiforov A. L. (1995) The ratio of rationality and freedom in human activity. – V. A. Lektorsky (ed.) Historical types of rationality. Vol. 1. Moscow: IF RAN. Pp. 282-298.
Nikiforov V. (2008) Selected works of different years. Riga: SIA "JUMI".
Nureyev R. M. (2005) Theory of public choice. Course of lectures: studies. The textbook for high schools. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics.
Ogurtsov A. P., Rozin V. M. (eds.) (2009) Science: from methodology to ontology. Moscow: IF RAN.
Paretto V. (2008) Compendium of general sociology. Moscow: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics.
Pozner R. A. (2004) Economic analysis of law. Vol. 1. Saint-Petersburg: Economic school.
Russell B. (1993) Will to doubt. – P S. Gurevich (ed.) Phenomenon of man: an anthology. Moscow: Higher school. Pp. 160-167.
Sadursky V. (2008) "Reasonableness" and pluralism of values in law and politics. – Comparative constitutional review. No. 4 (65) Pp. 21-36.
Schopenhauer A. (1900) World as will and representation. – Full collections of essays. Vol. l. Moscow.
Shagiyeva R.V. (ed.) (2011) Actual problems of the theory of state and law: textbook. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M.
Sloyan G. G. (2008) Justice as a communicative discourse of justice. – Philosophy of law in Russia. Theoretical principles and moral grounds. Saint-Petersburg: Publishing house of SPSU. Pp.95-104.
Stepin V. S. (2012) Scientific rationality in technogenic culture: types and historical evolution. – A.A. Guseynov, V.A. Lektorsky (eds.)Rationality and its borders: Materials of the international scientific conference "Rationality and its borders" within the meeting of the International Institute of philosophy in Moscow (September 15-18, 2011). Moscow: IF RAN.
Spinoza B. (1957) Political treatise. – Selected works. Vol. 2. Moscow: State publishing house of political literature. P. 285 – 382.
Stepin V.S. (1999) Theoretical knowledge. Moscow: Progress-Tradition. Stepin V.S., Gorokhov V. G., Rozov M. A. (1995) Philosophy of science and technology: textbook.Moscow: Kontakt-Alfa.
Trufanov D. O. (2011) Problem of social rationality in E. Durkheim's theory of solidarity. Postnon-classical (universal) approach. – Bulletin of the Volgograd state University. Ser.7. No. 3 (15). Pp. 28-36.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. (2021) http://www.un.org/ru/ documents/decl_conv/declarations/declhr.shtml
Vinichenko Y. V. (2003) Reasonableness in the civil law of the Russian Federation. Abstract of dissertation. PhD in law. Saint-Petersburg: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, Saint Petersburg University. http://lawtheses.com/razumnost-v-grazhdanskom-prave-rossiyskoy-federatcii Weber M. (1990) Basic sociological concepts. – Selected works. Moscow: Progress. Pp. 602 – 643.