PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF COURT APPEALS WITH CLAIMS TO MUNICIPAL BODIES ON RECOGNIZING LAND PLOT OWNERSHIP RIGHTS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 2, 2021

  Andrey Kolybanov

  Alexander Plekhanov

  Elena Serpukhova

Abstract

Study of the procedural speci cs of court applications is of current importance. This is because disputable situations occur in Russian law-enforcement practice, which are connected with realization of procedural law to appeal to the judicial authorities with claims to recognize the ownership of land plots. When dealing with claims for municipalities on the recognition of ownership of land a number of circumstances should be considered which fundamentally affect the outcome of the court case. These circumstances are divided into two groups. The  rst group relates to the legal status of the requested land plot (it was studied as a common one), whereas the second one is connected with the presence or absence of ownership of requested land plot by third parties. The purpose of the research at hand was the study and description of the procedural speci cs of the recognition of ownership of a land plot under circumstances where the municipality acts as a defendant and the land plot is located within the boundaries of a noncommercial garden association. In such a case, for the conditions and procedure of recognition of ownership of a land plot the following circumstances are of high importance: a category of a land plot, a kind of its permitted use, an assignment of a land plot to a particular territorial zone, as well as the presence or absence of structures on it including buildings under construction.

How to Cite

Kolybanov, A., Plekhanov, A., & Serpukhova, E. (2021). PROCEDURAL FEATURES OF COURT APPEALS WITH CLAIMS TO MUNICIPAL BODIES ON RECOGNIZING LAND PLOT OWNERSHIP RIGHTS. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (1), 32-39. Retrieved from http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/1349
Article views: 27 | PDF Downloads: 25

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

land plot, ownership, claim, legal decision, municipality, noncommercial garden association

References
1. Ivolzhatov A.V. State and authorities as members of private and public legal relations: speci cs of juridical personality. Actual problems of civil regulation: proceedings of the forum. Samara: Publishing house «Samara University», 2011. P. 115-118.
2. Narushkevich S.V. Participation of local authorities in legal land relationships. Actual problems of civil regulation: proceedings of the forum. Samara: Publishing house «Samara University», 2011. P. 529-531.
3. Kolesova O.N. Legal status of a cadastral engineer. Actual problems of civil regulation: proceedings of the forum. Samara: Publishing house «Samara University», 2011.P. 123-126.
4. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (Basic Law) / http://kodeks.systecs.ru/constitution/glava1/
5. The land code of the Russian Federation from October 25, 2001 No. 136-FZ / http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_33773/
6. The Federal Law of the Russian Federation from April 15, 1998 No. 66-FZ “On horticultural, gardening and country nonpro t associations of citizens” / http://giod.consultant.ru/documents/1110228?items=1&page=2
7. The Federal law from July 24, 2007 No. 221-FZ “On the state cadastre of real estate” / https://rg.ru/2007/08/01/kadastr-doc.html
8. Law of Samara Region from March 11, 2005 No. 94-DG “On land” / http://www.neftegorskadm.ru/adm/large_families/doc/provision_of_free_land/provision_of_free_land_3.pdf
9. Kolybanov A.V. The problem of realization of the right to appeal in the arbitration proceedings. The right and its realization in the 21st century: Collection of scienti c papers. Part 1. Saratov: Publishing house «Saratov State Law Academy», 2011. P. 311-312.
10. Kolybanov A.V To the question of the feasibility of the application of an agreement on a lawsuit in arbitration proceedings. Tradition and innovation in construction and architecture: Proceedings of the conference. Part 1. Samara: Samara State University of Architecture and Construction, 2013. P. 30-31.
11. Kolybanov A.V. Civil legal status of the bene ciary of insurance agreements. Tradition and innovation in construction and architecture: Proceedings of the conference. Samara: Samara State University of Architecture and Construction, 2011. P. 29-30.