OVERVIEW OF CANON LAW IN THE POST-SOVIET SPACE PART 1

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 2, 2021

  Kristaps Zarins

Abstract

Dealing with the subject of this paper, the main emphasis is placed concurrently on the philosophy and the scope of historical canonic law, while the author attempts, by means of this study, to illustrate those many nuances that could also be relevant to contemporary scholars of law in the above field for the recent 20 years. The study provides a joint assessment of both the policy of law and the position adopted by post-socialist states in respect of their national law in the process of transformation into a democratic society, and also the seemingly distant religious policy of those post-socialist countries, including its role in and influence on the regulatory framework, and it also proposes to take a look at canon law – the last living reflection of Roman law. The form and content of canon law itself can be the subject of study and discussion of how it is subordinated to, consistent with and functions alongside Roman law, this monument of history of law, and of its effect on modern legal thought; at the same time, it may also be concluded that, if we look at those provisions of Roman law which still remain in force, the experience accumulated in the studies of Roman Law over hundreds of years is only a facet of the body of law. Specifically, those are the provisions of canon law which reveal themselves through the values, principles and customs of law which are subjected to it transcendentally and structurally, also through the inter-polar aspect of international law, in the domain of both public and the private rights. It is naturally understood that as the national political regime changes, the general legal thought and beliefs change as well, new models and also sources of formation of post-socialist societies are formed, studied and sought for; specifically the historical period of development of law is often invoked, and if so, then the aim and result of this study is to try to clarify the relationship of post-socialist countries with religious organizations as the creator of the chief philosophical motives of law during the times of change. In this situation, this paper is also aimed at the study of a range of specific questions, namely, the genesis of elements of Canon Law and its impact on economic, social and, naturally, on legal reform in the 1990s.

How to Cite

Zarins, K. (2021). OVERVIEW OF CANON LAW IN THE POST-SOVIET SPACE PART 1. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (3), 76-84. Retrieved from http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/1374
Article views: 27 | PDF Downloads: 22

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

post-socialist states, canon law, religious organizations, Latin Church, Codex Iuris Canonici, Praeter ius, I integro

References
1. J.Ņikišins. Politiskā līdzdalība Eiropā: salīdzinošā analīze. Rīga, 2016, 61.lpp. See:http://www.szf.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/szf_faili/Petnieciba/promocijas_darbi/Nikisins_Jurijs_promocijas_darbs_Politiska_lidzdaliba_2016.compressed.pdf
2. Ibid,51.-52.lpp. See also: http://home.lu.lv/~rbalodis/Baznicu%20tiesibas/Religijas_Briviba/Rel_briviba_1.pdf
3. The Role of the Churches in the Renewing Societies, Lectures and Documents Budapest symposium March 3-5. 1997. Published by the International Religious Liberty Association (European Section), 1998, p.27.
4. http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/page/religion.html
5. http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/files/pages/importanceofgod.jpg
6. N.Aston. Christianity and Revolutionary Europe. New approaches to European history. Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. c.1750. Look at: https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/4863/35957-Inese_Runce_2008.pdf?sequence=1
7. KBV, Nr.7(487) 2014.,5.April. Look at: http://www.kbvestnesis.lv/index.php/garigai-dzivei/lasitajs-jauta/1472-katoliskas-baznicas-ritu-bagatiba
8. http://www.personal.psu.edu/students/j/s/jsa161/personal/school/UKR100/1596%20Union%20of%20Brest.htm arī https://houseofmaedhros.wordpress.com/isa-vesture-par-pareizticibu-latvija/
9. B. Prabhupad 1977., L.Ron Habbards 1986.g., A Report, Oslo 1990.g. Oslo National Library in facsimile form.
10. D.Stark, L.Bruszt. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, 1998, p.101
11. I.Ronald. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton University Press, 1997, pp.211.- 214
12. C. H. Heyns, P. W. Edge, F.Viljoen. Legal Responses to Religious Difference. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2002, p.325.-327
13. C.E. Farhadian. Introducing World Christianity. John Wiley & Sons, 2012, p.180
14. K. Kozlovska. Atgriešanās Eiropā. No starptautiskās atzīšanas līdz pirmajai prezidentūrai Eiropas Savienībā 1990 – 2015. Latvijas prezidentu, premjerministru, ministru un diplomātu esejās. Eiropas Komisija, Apgāds Zinātne, 2016, 23.-24
15. L.Shores. Collier’s Encyclopedia 1963 Yearbook (Year Book). Covering the Year 1962 . Published by Crowell-Collier. Tell.12., p. 340.
16. M. Rosenfeld, A. Sajó. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. OUP Oxford, p.1006 17. Ibid, p. 1011.
18. J. Rozenvalds, I. Ijabs. Latvija. Pārskats par tautas attīstību, 2008/2009 : Atbildīgums. Rīga, LU Sociālo un politisko pētījumu institūts, 2009, 29.
19. D.Stark, L.Bruszt. Postsocialist Pathways: Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge University Press, 1998, p.108
20. Savējie un svešie: sabiedrības radikalizācijas tendences Latvijā, Eiropā un pasaulē. Latvia. Stratēg̓iskās analīzes komisija, Zinātne, 2007, 15
21. O.Anderson. The Natural Moral Law: The Good After Modernity. Cambridge University Press, 2012, p.105
22. Stanisław Burdziej Warmia and MazuryUniversity. Sociological and Theological Imagination in a Post-secular Society. Online available from: http://polish-sociological-review.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/PSR186-03.pdf
23. G. M. Garcia. What Is Religious Liberty and What Should the Laws Guarantee. Fides et libertas 1998. The Journal of the International Religious Liberty Association. USA, p.7
24. R.Alvarado. Calvin and the Whigs: A Study in Historical Political Theology. Pantocrator Press, 2017, 114
25. H.H.Koh. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? Faculty Scholarship Series, Yale Law School, 1997 p. 97
26. Online available from: http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/pccs/documents/rc_pc_pccs_doc_22021997_ethics-in-ad_en.html
27. Online available from: https://foucault.info/doc/documents/disciplineandpunish/foucault-disciplineandpunishpanopticism-html
28. M.Perciaccante. Courts and Canon Law. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 6 Issue 1Fall, 1996, Article 6, p. 11 From:http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1203&context=cjlpp
29. T.Jundzis. Latvijas drošība un aizsardzība. Junda, 1995, 172.
30. Law books, 1876-1981: books and serials on law and its related subjects, Vol1. R.R. Bowker Co., 1981, p. 519