APPLICATION OF THE RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE LEGAL PRACTICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published:
Dec 3, 2021
Abstract
The article analyzes the application of the rules of private international law in the legal practice of the Republic of Singapore; the place of the rules of private international law in the legal system of Singapore and its impact on law enforcement practices. The features of the Singapore legal system demonstrate a successful combination of regulatory and legal elements of common law and continental legal family. The author suggests analyzing the features of ruling of problems related to the choice of location of the forum, and the choice of applicable law in the jurisprudence of the Singapore.
How to Cite
Demidov, D. (2021). APPLICATION OF THE RULES OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE LEGAL PRACTICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 6-14. Retrieved from http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/1428
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
proper law, choice of law, common law, bona fide, public policy
References
1. Hereinafter, the text of the Constitution of the Republic of Singapore cited the official online edition. The Constitution of the Republic of Singapore. Singapore Statues Online. http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/
2. Chapter 1. The Singapore legal system. The Singapore Law Committee. http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-1.
3. Opinion Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Singapore Yong Pang Ho (Yong Pung How) The Ministry of law – Fact File (appendix). https://www.mlaw.gov.sg/content/minlaw/en.html;
4. Modern implied private international law in Russia and the European Union: a monograph / A. Aliyev, Y. Basedow, M. Bardeen et al.; Ed. M. Bohuslav, A. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov, A. Trunk // M: Norma, 2013. 1st Book, 656 s.
5. Kanashevsky, V.A. Foreign economic transactions: substantive and conflict of regulation //M: Wolters Kluwer, 2008
6. Lim Chin Leng Ch.05 Singapore and International Law. The Singapore Law Committee http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-5#541
7. The «Rainbow Joy» [2005] 3 SLR 719; [2005] SGCA 36; Amerco Timbers Pte Ltd v Chatsworth Timber Corp Pte Ltd [1975-1977] SLR 25
8. http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-6?id=14848. Yeo Tiong Min. Chapter 6. The Conflict of Laws. http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-6
9. The Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Cap 322, 1999 Ed Revised edition 2006. P.26.
10. The decision of the House of Lords Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1986] 3 WLR 972, 3 All ER 843, [1987] AC 460 . Web. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1986/10.html
11. Yeo Tiong Min. Private International Law: Law Reform in Miscellaneous Matters. 2003. Faculty of Law, NUS.
12. Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v Turegum Insurance Co [2001] 3 SLR 330; Peh Teck Quee v Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale [2000] 1 SLR 148.
13. Joel Lee. Private international law in the Singapore Courts. 2007. SYBIL (Singapore Year of International Law and Contributors).
14. For more information about the application of this clause in the Russian law.: Information letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 26.02.2013 №156 «Review of practice of consideration by courts of arbitration cases on the application of the public policy as grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral decisions» // The Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. №5. 2013.
2. Chapter 1. The Singapore legal system. The Singapore Law Committee. http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-1.
3. Opinion Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Singapore Yong Pang Ho (Yong Pung How) The Ministry of law – Fact File (appendix). https://www.mlaw.gov.sg/content/minlaw/en.html;
4. Modern implied private international law in Russia and the European Union: a monograph / A. Aliyev, Y. Basedow, M. Bardeen et al.; Ed. M. Bohuslav, A. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov, A. Trunk // M: Norma, 2013. 1st Book, 656 s.
5. Kanashevsky, V.A. Foreign economic transactions: substantive and conflict of regulation //M: Wolters Kluwer, 2008
6. Lim Chin Leng Ch.05 Singapore and International Law. The Singapore Law Committee http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-5#541
7. The «Rainbow Joy» [2005] 3 SLR 719; [2005] SGCA 36; Amerco Timbers Pte Ltd v Chatsworth Timber Corp Pte Ltd [1975-1977] SLR 25
8. http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-6?id=14848. Yeo Tiong Min. Chapter 6. The Conflict of Laws. http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/overview/chapter-6
9. The Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Cap 322, 1999 Ed Revised edition 2006. P.26.
10. The decision of the House of Lords Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1986] 3 WLR 972, 3 All ER 843, [1987] AC 460 . Web. http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1986/10.html
11. Yeo Tiong Min. Private International Law: Law Reform in Miscellaneous Matters. 2003. Faculty of Law, NUS.
12. Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v Turegum Insurance Co [2001] 3 SLR 330; Peh Teck Quee v Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale [2000] 1 SLR 148.
13. Joel Lee. Private international law in the Singapore Courts. 2007. SYBIL (Singapore Year of International Law and Contributors).
14. For more information about the application of this clause in the Russian law.: Information letter of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 26.02.2013 №156 «Review of practice of consideration by courts of arbitration cases on the application of the public policy as grounds for refusal of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral decisions» // The Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. №5. 2013.