THE CONCEPT OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Dec 3, 2021

  Tatjana Jurkeviča

Abstract

A growing public interest in electronic information networks raises the necessity for a series of procedural measures. The main role in this issue is given to the growth of information types existing in the electronic format and its legal aspects, which needs to establish a stable normative regulation. These problems in their turn create a question on the evidence value of information existing in the electronic form. The question is particularly important in the cases when communication between the parties to a civil dispute is in the electronic form. The aim of evidence proceedings in procedural regulation is to develop preconditions for the court to clarify the true conditions of the case. To achieve the aim an appropriate procedural form is necessary which would let the judge and other parties to the process insure as conveniently and effectively as possible to show and try true conditions of the case and to clear the necessary evidence to make information technologies serve the litigation purposes more effectively. The solutions of those questions are closely linked to the understanding of the electronic evidence essence, as well as its place in the trial process.

How to Cite

Jurkeviča, T. (2021). THE CONCEPT OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 75-83. Retrieved from http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/1435
Article views: 46 | PDF Downloads: 71

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

evidence, electronic evidence, civil proceedings, evidence source

References
1. Civil Procedings Law. «Latvijas Vēstnesis», 326/330 (1387/1391), 03.11.1998., «Ziņotājs», 23, 03.12.1998.
2. Criminal Proceedings Law. «Latvijas Vēstnesis» 74 (3232), 11.05.2005., «Ziņotājs», 11, 09.06.2005.
3. Administrative Proceedings Law. «Latvijas Vēstnesis» 164 (2551), 14.11.2001., «Ziņotājs», 23, 13.12.2001.
4. Līcis A. Legislation Requirements and Evidence. R. TNA. 2003.
5. Sahnova T.V. Regulation of Evidence and Prof in Civil Proceedings.//State and Legislation. 1993. №7.
6. Information Publicity Law. «Latvijas Vēstnesis», 334/335 (1395/1396), 06.11.1998.
7. Palcikovska M. Judge Objectivity and Impartiality: Adversarial Principle Realization. // Solicitor’s Word, 2007. Nr.48 (501), accessible: www.juristavards.lv, addressed 02.04.2015.
8. Uldis Miķelsons. Electronic Evidence//Information and Communication Law. Author team U. Ķiņs’s legislation edition. // R. 2002.
9. European Council Convention on Cybercrime accepted 23rd November, 2003, enforced 1st June, 2007, published: Latvijas vēstnesis, 171 (3539), 26.10.2006.
10. Fedulejeve, N. Electronic Publishing//Bibliography. 2003. № 4., accessible: http://www.bookresearch.ru/ebook.htm, addressed 12.01.2015.
11. Semiletov S. I. Electronic Document as a Product of Technological Process of Information Documentation and as an Object of Legal Regulation.//State and Law. 2003. № 1.
12. Gadasin V.A Konjavskij V.A. Basics of Electronic Information Exchange Phenomenon. // Minsk. 2004.
13. Ose D. Evidence and Proof in Civil Proceedings. Promotion Paper. University of Latvia. 2013.
14. Versinin A.P. Electronic Document: Legal Form and Evidence in Court. // М., 2000.
15. Krumiņš M. Electronic Evidence and their Application in Proof Proceedings. Lecture. Swon Solicitor Professional Development Training. 2015
16. Forensic Research Department Website: http://www.ekspertize.vp.gov.lv/index.php?sadala=6&ln=lv#informacija, addressed 4th April, 2015.
17. Lukjanova I.N. Evidence in Arbitration Process. // М., 2003.