ANALYSIS OF CURRENT WEAPON SOLUTION SCENARIOS CONFLICTS: THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR UKRAINE

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Apr 4, 2022

Abstract

The article analyzes the socio-political situation in the country, which requires the definition of priority mechanisms of state response to achieve results with the establishment of peace in Ukraine. The urgency of the study is determined by the need to resolve the problems of the armed conflict in the Donbass and the needs of the conciliatory positions of government and society, creating the preconditions for an effective negotiation process. The purpose of the study is to analyze possible scenarios in the east of Ukraine in modern conditions and to develop optimal mechanisms for resolving the conflict on legislative, economic, military, diplomatic, social and humanitarian grounds. At the same time, Ukraine’s national security system is constantly being transformed and updated in line with new threats and therefore requires constant analysis and study at both the scientific and state levels.

How to Cite

Tsevelyov, O. (2022). ANALYSIS OF CURRENT WEAPON SOLUTION SCENARIOS CONFLICTS: THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR UKRAINE. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2021-2-22
Article views: 80 | PDF Downloads: 98

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

armed conflict, Minsk agreements, temporarily occupied territories, conflict resolution model, separate districts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts

References
1. Policy paper (2017). Propozytsii do polityky shchodo vrehuliuvannia konfliktu na tymchasovo nepodkontrolnykh terytoriiakh na Skhodi Ukrainy [Proposals for a policy to resolve the conflict in the temporarily uncontrolled territories in eastern Ukraine]. Retrieved from: https://parlament.org.ua/2017/09/08/propozytsiyi-do-polityky-shhodo-vregulyuvannya-konfliktu-na-tymchasovonepidkontrolnyh-terytoriyah-na-shodi-ukrayiny-policy-paper.
2. Chyprii L., Zagrebelnui O. (2017). Osoblyvosti ta shliakhy vyrishennia voienno-politychnoho konfliktu na Skhodi Ukrainy [Features and ways to resolve the military-political conflict in eastern Ukraine]. Bulletin of Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University. Political Science. Pp. 66–72.
3. Fond “Demokratychni initsiatyvy” (2021). Zhodnykh istotnykh zmin v sviti vrehuliuvannia konfliktu chekaty ne varto [We should not expect any significant changes in the world of conflict resolution]. Retrieved from: https://dif.org.ua/article/mariya-zolkina-nikakikh-sushchestvennykhizmeneniy-v-sfere-uregulirovaniya-konflikta-ozhidat-ne-stoit.
4. Kapitonenko І. (2016). Linii rozmezhuvannia v konflikte na Donbasi [Demarcation lines in the Donbas conflict]. Analytics, Issue 1 (3).
5. Tsentr Rozymkov (2019). Viina na Donbasi [The war in the Donbass]. Working version of the analytical report. Kyiv. 144.
6. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2014). Postanova Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy vid 22 liutoho 2014 r. № 756–VII “Pro zapobihannia proiavam separatyzmu ta inshym posiahanniam na osnovy natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy” [Decree The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 22 february 2014 № 756–VII “On prevention of separatism and other encroachments on the basis of Ukraine’s national security”].
7. Poroshenko P. (2014). Mirnyi plan Prezydenta Ukrainy po vrehuliuvanniu sytuatsii v skhidnykh rehionakh Ukrainy [Measurement plan of the President of Ukraine to resolve the situation in the eastern regions of Ukraine] Political text.
8. Yaroshenko E. (2016). Smozhet li Ukraina razbit’ DNR i LNR: pljusy i minusy “horvatskogo scenarija” [Will Ukraine be able to beat the DPR and LPR: the pros and cons of the “croatian scenario”]. Apostrophe, August 7.
9. Kamenetskii M. (2016). Vojna v Horvatii: likvidacija separatistov za 84 chasa i zadacha geroev [War in Croatia: elimination of separatists in 84 hours and the task of the heroes]. ICTV Facts, 18 April 2016.
10. Yaroshenko E. (2016). Otpustit ili ostavit: dast lich to-to Ukraine otdelenie Donbassa [Will let go or leave: will give a person to Ukraine a branch of Donbass]. Apostrophe, 18 September 2016.
11. Oktusyuk A. (2016) Posledstvija krymskoj “diversii”: Ukrainu zhdut chetyre scenarija razvitija sobytij [Consequences of the Crimean “sabotage”: Ukraine will face four scenarios for the development of events]. Apostrophe, 12 August 2016.
12. Report (2017). Ukraina u 2017 rotsi: vnutrishnie ta zovnishnie stanovyshche ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Ukraine in 2017: internal and external situation and development prospects]. Retrieved from: http://old.niss.gov.ua/book/Eks_d2007/ index.htm.
13. Ukaz Prezydenta Rosyiskoi Federatsyy (2021) [Decree of the President of the Russian Federation 15 november 2021 № 657] “Pro nadannia humanitarnoi pidtrymky naselenniu okremykh rehioniv Donetskoi i Luhanskoi oblastei Ukrainy” [“About the improvement of the humanitarian community for the population of the surrounding regions of Donetsk and Luhansk regions of Ukraine”]. Moscow.
14. European truth (2021). Yevrointehratsiia [European integration]. Newspaper.