THE NATURE OF “SELF” PUBLIC PERSON THROUGH DETERMINANTS OF THE PHENOMENON OF AGGRESSION IN THE MODERN VIRTUAL-DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Apr 22, 2022

Abstract

The article investigates the concept of the phenomenon of the “Self” public person as a boundary determinant of the space “BETWEEN” aggression and harmony. The phenomenon of aggression in the virtualdigital environment is understood through the nature of the human “I” and its demarcation as a necessary component of the communicative competence of a modern person. The limits of the penetration of the phenomenon of the Self public person into the open public space and the influence of the public on human identity are comprehended. The scientific novelty is represented by the understanding of the concept of the Self public person, which forms a new anthropological direction of research and represents the conceptual paradigm of the relation “human I – publicity – human We – the living space of the Other”. Here, virtual-digital space becomes accessible, universal, and at the same time, a contradictory way of constructing the Self public person, affecting certain existential manifestations of its inner nature.

How to Cite

Vasylieva, L. (2022). THE NATURE OF “SELF” PUBLIC PERSON THROUGH DETERMINANTS OF THE PHENOMENON OF AGGRESSION IN THE MODERN VIRTUAL-DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (3), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2021-3-3
Article views: 89 | PDF Downloads: 95

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

Self, aggression, public person, living space, external, internal

References
1. Beisad Z., Marion Z., On-Van-Kun K. (ed.) (2021). “Medytatsii” Dekarta u dzerkali suchasnykh tlumachen [Descartes’ meditations in the mirror of modern interpretations]. Kyiv: Dukh i Litera, 432 p. (in Ukrainian).
2. Bloom D. (2014). A Response to “Contact at the Source of Experience” – Dan Bloom joins Jean-Marie Robine in a “duet”. New York: Ravenwood Press, pp. 137–148.
3. Bodriiiar Zh. (2000). Simvolicheskii obmen i smert [Symbolic exchange and deat]. Moscow: Dobrosvet, 387 р. (in Russian).
4. Ferri E. (2005). Ugolovnaia sotciologiia [Сriminal sociology]. Moscow: INFRA. 658 p. (in Russian).
5. Freid Z. (2020). Maloe sobranie sochinenii [Small collected works]. Moscow: Azbuka, 608 р. (in Russian).
6. Francesetti G., Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2013). Beyond the Pillars of Hercules. A Gestalt Therapy Perspective of Psychotic Experiences. Milano: FrancoAngeli, pр. 399–434.
7. Fromm E. (2020). Anatomiia chelovecheskoi destruktivnosti [Anatomy of human destructiveness]. Moscow: AST, 736 р. (in Russian).
8. Gazniuk L. (2003). Somatichne buttja personal’nogo svіtu osobistostі [Somatic existence of the personal world of the individual]. Kharkiv: CDAFC, 356 p. (in Ukrainian).
9. Gritcanov A. (ed.) (2003). Noveishii filosofskii slovar [The latest philosophical dictionary]. Mn. : Knizhnyi Dom, 1280 p. (in Russian).
10. Kaufman S. (2015). Ungifted: Intelligence redefined. New York: Вasic Books. 432 р. (in English).
11. Kravets A., Menzelevskyi S. (ed.) (2018). Rukhlyvyi prostir [Moving space]. Kyiv: ART KNYHA. 212 p. (in Ukrainian).
12. Lombrozo Ch. (2015). Genialnost i pomeshatelstvo [Genius and madness]. SPb. : Azbuka. 352 р. (in Russian).
13. May R. (2007). Love and Will. New York : W.W. Norton. 352 p. (in English).
14. Perls F., Hefferline R., Goodman P. (1995). Gestalt therapy: Excitement and growth in the human personality. Souvenir Press Ltd, 470 p. (in English).
15. Phillippson P. (2014). The Self and the Skin. New York: Ravenwood Press. (in English).
16. Polster E. (1988). Every person’s life is worth a novel. New York: W. Norton and co. (in English).
17. Protsenko O. (2000). Bahatovymirnist strukturnoi modeli sotsialnoho konfliktu [Multidimensionality of the structural model of social conflict]. Scientific notes of Kharkiv Military University. Kharkiv: KhVU. Vol. 7. Pp. 35–42 (in Ukrainian).
18. Rudnev V. (1997). Slovar kultury [Dictionary of culture]. Moscow: Agraf, 382 p. (in Russian).
19. Shynkaruk V. (ed.) (2002). Filosofskyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary]. Kyiv: Abrys, 742 p. (in Ukrainian).
20. Touraine A. (1971). The Post-Industrial Society: Tomorrow Social History: Classes, Conflicts and Programmed-Society. New York: Random House, 244 p.
21. Vasylieva L. (2019). Liudyna publichna v kultur-komunikatyvnomu prostori suchasnosti [Man is public in the cultural-communicative space of modernity]. Kharkiv: Machulin, 392 p. (in Ukrainian).
22. Yunh K. (2019) AION. Narysy shchodo symvoliky samosti. Lviv: Astroliabiia. 432 р. (in Ukrainian).
23. Zimmel G. (2006) Izbrannye raboty [Selected works]. Kiev: Nika-Tcentr. 440 p. (in Ukrainian).