Published: Jan 17, 2024


The events of recent years in Ukraine testify to the growing importance of religious and political factors in Ukrainian society, which requires a rethinking of the phenomena and processes associated with them. For young Ukraine, the formation of an autocephalous church is a matter of national security, establishing the reference point of national self-identification, the prestige of the state in the international arena, and most importantly, the possibility of consolidating citizens into a single, largest confession in the country. The purpose of the article is to highlight the problems of political influence in a European scale on the process of total division of the branches of Ukrainian Orthodoxy into different jurisdictions. The evolution of political processes during the formation of the autocephalous system is revealed. It has been established that the future unification of Ukrainian Orthodoxy will contribute to the consolidation of Ukrainian society. This is the key task of the state, the church and all civil institutions in conditions of open war on the part of the aggressor. It has been proven that the reason for the evolution of state and political processes in Europe is the lack of clear regulation of the procedure for declaring a new autocephalous church, which deepened the division of churches in Ukraine.

How to Cite

KobetіakA., & Sokolovsky, O. (2024). POLITICAL DETERMINANTS OF THE ORTHODOXY JURISDICTIONAL DIVISION IN UKRAINE IN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (4), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2023-4-9
Article views: 28 | PDF Downloads: 38



determinants, President, political institution, state power, autocephaly, Orthodox Church

1. Ishchuk N., Sagan O. (2020). Confrontation of Orthodox Churches in Modern Ukraine: Reasons, Trends and Prospects of Reconciliation. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 40: Iss. 3, Article 4. Р. 8–33. [in English].
2. Herhelyuk M. (2014). Kanonichni ta ekleziolohichni zasady avtokefalʹnoho ustroyu tserkvy u strukturi Vselensʹkoho pravoslav'ya: istorychnyy kontekst. [Canonical and ecclesiological foundations of the autocephalous organization of churches in the structure of Universal Orthodoxy: historical context]. (PhD dissertation). Chernivtsi. 199 s. [in Ukrainian].
3. Hovorun C. (2016). Is the Byzantine «Symphony» Possible in Our Days? Journal of Church and State. P. 280–296. [in English].
4. Hovorun, S. (2019). Teoretychni zasady pravoslavnoyi ekleziolohiyi u yiyi istorychnomu rozvytku [Theoretical foundations of Orthodox ecclesiology in its historical development]. (Doctor dissertation). Kiev, 623 s. [in Ukrainian].
5. Dokumenty Svyatoho i Velykoho Soboru Pravoslavnoyi Tserkvy. Kryt. (2016). Kiev. 112 s. [in Ukrainian].
6. Lucian N. Leustean. Orthodoxy and Political Myths in Balkan National Identities. National Identities 10. №. 4 (2008). Р. 421–432. [in English].
7. Oleksandr (Drabynko), mytropolyt. (2018). Ukrayinsʹka Tserkva: shlyakh do avtokefaliyi. Do dyskusiyi navkolo kanonichnoho statusu, bohosluzhbovoyi movy ta istoriyi Ukrayinsʹkoyi Tserkvy [Ukrainian Church: the path to autocephaly]. – Kiev. DUKH I LITERA. 684 s. [in Ukrainian].
8. Rudych F., Balaban R., Derhachov O. (2002). Ukrayina u suchasnomu heopolitychnomu prostori: teoretychnyy i prykladnyy aspekty: monohrafiya [Ukraine in the modern geopolitical space: theoretical and applied aspects] monograph. Kiеv: MAUP. 487 s. [in Ukrainian].
9. Sahan O. (2004). Vselensʹke pravoslav'ya: sutʹ, istoriya, suchasnyy stan [Ecumenical Orthodoxy: essence, history, current state]. Kyiv. 912 s. [in Ukrainian].
10. Papkova I. (2011) The Orthodox Church and Russian Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. 265 s. [in English].
11. Politics and Religion in Central and Eastern Eutope: Traditions and Transitions. (1994). Еdited by William H. Swatos. Westport: Praeger Publishers. 230 p. [in English].
12. Sanderson S. W. (2005). Autocephaly as a function of institutional stability and organizational change in the Eastern orthodox church. University of Maryland, College Park. 196 p. [in English].
13. Stan L. (2007). Religion and Politics in Post-Communist Romania. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 270 p. [in English].
14. Tunick М. (2022). Religious Freedom and Toleration: A Liberal Pluralist Approach to Conflicts over Religious DisplaysGet access. Journal of Church and State. Volume 64. Issue 2. P. 280–300. [in English].