FEATURES OF RUSSIA’S SOFT IMPACT ON UKRAINE (UNTIL 2014)

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jan 17, 2024

Abstract

The article considers the main features of Russia’s soft impact on Ukraine. The study is based on the application of the soft power concept of the American scientist J. Nye. The term soft power means to the ability of one actor to influence others using attraction (of one’s values, culture, politics, etc.), persuasion and involvement, as opposed to hard coercion and bribery (hard power). The Russian Federation’s soft impact on Ukraine, despite certain achievements, was generally inefficient, inconsistent and unsystematic. The reasons for this were: 1) stereotyped attitudes towards Ukraine as a constantly loyal and close country; 2) the predominance of the pro-Western national project in Ukraine, which is based on the opposition of Russian and Ukrainian development models; 3) the Russian Federation has not had a sufficiently attractive image for Ukrainians, taking into account the specifics of its political (authoritarianism) and economic (raw materials) systems; 4) insufficient institutional support for the soft influence policy, which is especially noticeable against the background of the Western non-governmental organizations’ activity in Ukraine; 5) the delay in implementing a targeted soft power policy at the state level. At the same time, it is worth noting certain successes in this direction of Russian policy related to the church, educational, cultural, information and economic areas. However, these achievements, mostly related to the previous common historical experience of the two countries, were often accumulated inertially, without the systematic and conscious use of soft impact’s tools. Russia’s use of hard power against Ukraine since 2014 has reversed all these gains.

How to Cite

Mateleshko, Y. (2024). FEATURES OF RUSSIA’S SOFT IMPACT ON UKRAINE (UNTIL 2014). Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (4), 72-79. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2023-4-10
Article views: 49 | PDF Downloads: 51

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

soft power, Russia, Ukraine, bilateral relations, politics

References
1. Aref’ev, A. (2013). Inostrannye studenty v rossijskih vuzah (doklad) [Foreign students in Russian universities (report)]. Demoskop Weekly, 571–572. Retrieved from http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0571/analit02.php
2. Bogomolov, A., & Lytvynenko, O. (2012). A Ghost in the Mirror: Russian Soft Power in Ukraine. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263853878_A_Ghost_in_the_Mirror_Russian_Soft_Power_in_Ukraine_The_Aims_and_Means_of_Russian_Influence_Abroad_Series_A_Ghost_in_the_Mirror_Russian_Soft_Power_in_Ukraine
3. Cheskin, A. (2017). Russian soft power in Ukraine: A structural perspective. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2017.09.001
4. Federal’noe agentstvo po delam Sodruzhestva Nezavisimyh gosudarstv, sootechestvennikov, prozhivayushchih za rubezhom, i po mezhdunarodnomu gumanitarnomu sotrudnichestvu (Rossotrudnichestvo) [Federal Agency for the Commonwealth of Independent States, Compatriots Living Abroad, and International Humanitarian Cooperation (Rossotrudnichestvo)]. rs.gov.ru. Retrieved from http://rs.gov.ru/
5. Feklyunina, V. (2016). Soft power and identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian world(s)’. European Journal of International Relations, 22(4), 773–796. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066115601200
6. Hudson, V. (2015). ‘Forced to Friendship’? Russian (Mis-)Understandings of Soft Power and the Implications for Audience Attraction in Ukraine. Politics, 35(3-4), 330–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12106
7. Informacionnyj portal fonda «Russkij mir» [Information portal of the Russkiy Mir Foundation]. russkiymir.ru. Retrieved from https://russkiymir.ru
8. Istoriia i suchasnist ukrainskoho pravoslavia. Statystyka (2013) [History and modernity of Ukrainian Orthodoxy. Statistics]. Istorychna Pravda, 25 lypnia. Retrieved from https://www.istpravda.com.ua/articles/2013/07/25/131816/
9. Ivanchenko, V. (2015). «Myagkaya sila» Rossii i ukrainskij precedent [Russia’s soft power and the Ukrainian precedent]. RSMD, 5 dekabrya. Retrieved from https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/viktoriia-ivanchenko/31293/
10. Koncepciya vneshnej politiki Rossijskoj Federacii [The concept of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation] (2013). kremlin.ru. Retrieved from http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/41d447a0ce9f5a96bdc3.pdf
11. Mihratsiinyi profil Ukrainy. 2011–2015 (2016) [Migration profile of Ukraine. 2011–2015]. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://dmsu.gov.ua/assets/files/mig_profil/MP2015.pdf
12. Sedliar, Yu., & Lymar, M.. (2012). «Miaka syla» Rosii u konteksti ukrainsko-rosiiskykh vidnosyn [Russia’s soft power in the context of Ukrainian-Russian relations]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomorskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly. Ser.: Istoriia, 159(171), 63–69.
13. Sherr, D. (2013). Zhestkaya diplomatiya i myagkoe prinuzhdenie: rossijskoe vliyanie za rubezhom [Hard diplomacy and soft coercion: Russian influence abroad]. Kiev: Zapovіt.
14. Slovo Svyatejshego Patriarha Kirilla v Nikol'skom kafedral'nom sobore goroda Gorlovki [The speech of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill in the St. Nicholas Cathedral in Gorlovka] (2009). Russian Orthodox Church: official website of the Moscow Patriarchate. Retrieved from http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/707934.html
15. Stavlennia naselennia Ukrainy do Rosii ta naselennia Rosii do Ukrainy: presreliz [The attitude of the Ukraine’s population to Russia and the Russia’s population to Ukraine: press release] (2021). Kyivskyi mizhnarodnyi instytut sotsiolohii (KMIS), 17 hrudnia. Retrieved from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1078
16. Szostek, J. (2014). Russia and the News Media in Ukraine: A Case of «Soft Power»? East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 28(3), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325414537297
17. Tereschenko, D., & Koval, N. (2022). First Roubles, Then Guns: The Alexander Gorchakov Public Diplomacy Fund: case study. Ukrainian Institute. Retrieved from https://ui.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/case-study_the-alexander-gorchakov-public-diplomacy-fund.pdf
18. U 2013 rotsi yevropeisku osvitu obraly 29 tysiach ukraintsiv (statystychni dani Tsentru doslidzhennia suspilstva) [In 2013, 29,000 Ukrainians chose European education (statistics of the Center for Social Research)] (2014). osvita.ua. Retrieved from https://osvita.ua/abroad/higher_school/39508/
19. Vershinin, A. (2016). Ukrainskaya politika Rossii: mezhdu myagkoj i zhestkoj silami [Ukrainian policy of Russia: between soft and hard powers]. Kontury global’nyh transformacij: politika, ekonomika, pravo, 3(9), 38–74.
20. Vladimir Putin: Nam neobhodima novaya strategiya nacional'noj politiki [Vladimir Putin: We need a new national policy strategy] (2012). Rossijskaya gazeta, 22 yanvarya. Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2012/01/23/nacvopros.html
21. Vorochkov, A. (2016). «Myagkaya sila» sovremennoj Possii: institucional’nyj aspekt [Soft power of modern Russia: the institutional aspect]. Teorii i problemy politicheskih issledovanij, 5A(5), 258–275.
22. Vystuplenie V. V. Putina na prieme po sluchayu 1020-letiya Kreshcheniya Rusi [Vladimir Putin’s speech at a reception on the occasion of the 1020th anniversary of the Baptism of Rus] (2008). archive.government.ru. Retrieved from http://archive.government.ru/docs/1525/
23. Yablonskyi, V., & Zdioruk, S. (Eds.). (2014). Ukraina ta proekt «russkoho myra»: analitychna dopovid [Ukraine and the Russian world project: an analytical report]. Kyiv: Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen.
24. Za vstup Ukrainy do YeS vystupaiut 41% hromadian, za Mytnyi soiuz – 35% (2013) [41% of citizens support Ukraine’s accession to the EU, and 35% support the Customs Union]. Dzerkalo tyzhnia. Ukraina, 03 zhovtnia. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/ukr/POLITICS/za-vstup-ukrayini-do-yes-vistupayut-41-gromadyan-za-mitniy-soyuz-35-129478_.html