THE CONSENSUS PROBLEM: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jun 11, 2025

  Vusala Loghman Gulmaliyeva

Abstract

The article is devoted to the social-philosophical analysis of consensus, which is one of the pressing issues of contemporary times. Consensus is regarded as a critical mechanism in ensuring both individual and collective welfare. The world is fraught with conflict zones that arise based on various motives and contentions, and simultaneously, efforts are made to seek solutions to these conflicts. In modern science, optimal consensus models and pacifist approaches are proposed, with attempts being made to define new directions for the development of conflictology. The article emphasizes that the resolution of social conflicts faces considerable challenges, as each new conflict emerges with its own unique content and scenario, necessitating different approaches for its resolution. These searches also encompass the philosophical, political, and legal aspects of public consciousness. Within the framework of the laws of social dynamics, efforts are made to bring conflicts to the consensus plane and to seek scientific solutions to them. In the article, the relationship between consensus and conflict, based on Hegelian logic, is explained through the structure of antithesis (conflict), thesis (dialogue), and synthesis (consensus). While dialogues aim for a predetermined consensus, conflict, in turn, promotes consensus through dialogues in a philosophical sense. This approach highlights the reciprocal relationship and interdependent nature between conflict and consensus. The limitations of idealizing consensus, as well as the difficulties in its realization, are linked to the impact of the multifaceted and multicontent social structure of contemporary society. The human factor plays a fundamental role in consensus, as moral values are crucial in conflict resolution. Social conflicts arise from the balance created between human nature and morality, reflecting the results of broader societal and state struggles. Ultimately, the achievement of consensus in social conflicts is a product of human moral and value-oriented consciousness.

How to Cite

Gulmaliyeva, V. L. (2025). THE CONSENSUS PROBLEM: SOCIAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2025-2-14
Article views: 31 | PDF Downloads: 8

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

consensus, conflict, dialogue, stability, order, harmony

References
1. Kişi olmaya dair (To become a person), Rogers, C. (2011) Çevirmen: Aysun Babacan, Butlu: İstanbul: Ocak 2011. 586 s.
2. A Oberschall (1978). Theories of Social Conflict/ Annual Review of Sociology Volume 4, 1978. pp. 291-315 (Volume publication date August 1978). https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals
3. Anarchy Works by Peter Gelderloos. Ardent Press, 2010. https://files.libcom.org/files/Gelderloos
4. Blondel, Jean and Inoguchi, Takashi (2006). Political Cultures in Asia and Europe: Citizens, states and societal values. New York: Routledge. 2006. 207 p,
5. Coser Lewis A. (1956) The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: The Free Press, 1956. 192 p.
6. Day, Christopher with Parnell, Rosie (2003). Consensus Design: Socially inclusive process. Burlington: Architectural Press, 2003. 241 p.
7. Fontana, Benedetto (2006). The Concept of Hegemony in Gramsci // Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics // Edited by Mark Haugaard and Howard H. Lentner, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2006, pp.23-44.
8. Galam, Serge and Moscovici, Serge (1991). Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups // European Journal of Social Psychology, 1991, Vol. 21, pp. 49-74.
9. Galtung, Johan (1996). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Oslo: International Peace Research Institute. 1996. 289 p.
10. Habermas, J. (1981). The Theory of Communicative Action, 1981
11. Hans Köchler (1997). Philosophical Foundations of Civilizational Dialogue. International Seminar on Civilizational Dialogue (3rd: 15–17 September 1997: Kuala Lumpur), BP171.5 ISCD. Kertas kerja persidangan / conference papers. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Library, 1997
12. Henry Kissinger (2001). Does America Need a Foreign Policy? Toward a Diplomacy for the 21st Century. ISBN 0-684-85567-4.
13. Homeira Moshirzadeh (2020). The Idea of Dialogue of Civilizations and Core-Periphery Dialogue in International Relations. All Azimuth V9, N2, 2020, 211-227. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1066093
14. Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). Phenomenology of Spirit, 1807. 539 p.
15. Jeong, Ho-Won (2010). Conflict Management and Resolution. An introduction. New York: Routledge. 2010. 256 p.
16. Kostiner, Joseph (2009). Conflict and Cooperation in the Gulf Region. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009. 287 p.
17. Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus (1975). (Edition Suhrkamp 623), Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. Translated as Legitimation Crisis, Thomas McCarthy (trans.), Boston: Beacon Press
18. Roberto, Michael A. (2005). Why Great Leaders Don’t Take Yes for an Answer: Managing for Conflict and Consensus, New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing, 304 p.
19. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (1969). Duquesne University Press, in English, translator, Alphonso Lingis, 400 p.
20. The Logic of Practice, Bourdieu, P. (1990) Translated by Richard Nice. 1990. 330 p.