Published: Dec 29, 2023

  Heorhii Slukin

  Vitalii Danich


The characteristics of modern societies are central to discussions of various types of policy (social, economic, etc.) and are often seen as predictors of socio-economic processes. Any society can be studied through the lens of social phenomena. Hence, it seems fair to assume that the better one understands the nature of social matter and its impact on various processes, the better one's decisions will be able to meet today's challenges. The purpose of this paper is to explain and present the new framework for measuring social phenomena in the form of an algebra based on the definition of social phenomenon, its components, rationality and mathematical logic. Methodology. Using the example of social cohesion, the paper examines the current fundamental methodological approaches to interpreting the definition and, consequently, measuring social phenomena. In this paper, the authors use an analogy with probability space and event algebra to develop their mathematical method. As a result, the article presents and explains the basic terms of the algebra of social phenomena that make up the new concept. Practical implications. The authors' approach to formalisation provides a tool for deriving the measure of a complex phenomenon from the measures of its components (simple phenomena), as demonstrated in the example. Thus, this study enriches the range of methods suitable for deepening one's knowledge of the social characteristics of the society under study. Value/Originality. The concept of algebra as a methodology for measuring social phenomena and establishing dependencies between them on the basis of mathematical logic has not yet been the subject of public discussion. Therefore, this publication is also an invitation to a scientific discussion.

How to Cite

Slukin, H., & Danich, V. (2023). ALGEBRA OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA. Economics & Education, 8(4), 89-94.
Article views: 54 | PDF Downloads: 42



social phenomenon, algebra, socio-economic modelling, social cohesion, mathematical formalisation, measurement


Berner, Heiko & Bertrand, Romain (2023). Social Cohesion. A Basis for the Primary Prevention of Radicalisation in Cities. Journal for Deradicalization, 37, 72–104.

Cooley, Charles Horton (1909). Primary Groups. Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind, 23-31. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Durkheim, Emile (1897). Suicide: a study in sociology. New York, NY: F. Alcan.

Dvoretska, H. V. (2002). Sociology. Kyiv: KNEU.

Xavier Fonseca, Stephan Lukosch & Frances Brazier (2019). Social cohesion revisited: a new definition and how to characterize it. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32:2, 231–253. DOI:

Freud, Sigmund (1921). Mass psychology and ego analysis. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.

Granovetter, Mark S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.

Green, A. and Janmaat, J. G. (2011). Regimes of Social Cohesion: Societies and the Crisis of Globalisation. NewYork: Palgrave Macmillan.

Homans, George C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.

Horodianenko, V. H. (2008). Sociology. Kyiv: Akademiia.

Horsham, Zoe, Abrams, Dominic, Davies, Ben, & Lalot, Fanny. (2024). The Causal Relationship Between Volunteering and Social Cohesion: A Large Scale Analysis of Secondary Longitudinal Data. Social Indicators Research. DOI:

Kartashov, M. V. (2007). Probability, processes, statistics. Kyiv: Kyivskyi universytet.

Sahharon, Hamizah, Bolong, Jusang & Omar, Siti. (2023). Exploring the Evolution of Social Cohesion: Interdisciplinary Theories and their Impact. Forum Komunikasi (Vols. 18), № 2, (pp. 58–73).

Larsen, Christian Albrekt. (2013). The Rise and Fall of Social Cohesion: The Construction and Deconstruction of Social Trust in the US, UK, Sweden and Denmark. Oxford: OUP.

Lewin, Kurt. (1946). Behavior and Development as a Function of the Total Situation. Manual of Child Psychology, (pp. 791-844). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Lockwood, David. (1999). Civic Integration and Social Cohesion. Capitalism and Social Cohesion, (pp. 63-84). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lott, Albert J., and Bernice E. Lott. (1966). Group Cohesiveness and Individual Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 61–73.

Maxwell, Judith. (1996). Social Dimensions of Economic Growth. Edmonton: Department of Economics, University of Alberta.

Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

D. Stanley. (2003). What Do We Know about Social Cohesion: The Research Perspective of the Federal Government's Social Cohesion Research Network. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1), 5–17.