Published: Apr 12, 2024

  Olena Omelianenko

  Nadiia Artyukhova


The aim of this paper is to summarise and present the main features of project-based learning (PjBL) within innovation-based development. Methodology. The methodology of this study involves the use of PjBL as an educational and technology transfer tool. In an educational context, it uses a structured approach where students identify real-world problems, conduct research, develop projects, collaborate on their implementation, and reflect on their experiences to deepen learning and develop critical thinking. PjBL application scenarios cover a variety of disciplines, including STEM education, social sciences, business and humanities, enabling students to apply knowledge and skills to solve real-world problems. In the field of technology transfer, a similar PjBL principle is applied to facilitate the transfer of research innovations for practical application. This involves collaborative partnerships, technology assessment, prototyping, market validation, licensing or commercialisation, fostering innovation and translating research into tangible societal benefits. This study aims to demonstrate the effectiveness and versatility of PjBL as a transformational methodology in both the educational and technology transfer contexts. Practical implications. PjBL encourages active, experiential learning where participants interact directly with real-world problems. This hands-on approach fosters a deeper understanding of concepts and encourages innovation by allowing participants to apply theoretical knowledge in practical scenarios. PjBL can have a long-term impact on innovation by fostering a mindset of lifelong learning and continuous improvement. The skills and experiences gained through PjBL can help people become innovative thinkers and problem solvers who will contribute to positive change in their industries and local communities. Value/Originality. It is substantiated that PjBL allows participants to immerse themselves in real problems or scenarios relevant to technology transfer. By working on projects that simulate the challenges faced in the transfer process, participants gain a deeper understanding of the complexities and develop practical skills that can be directly applied in technology transfer activities.

How to Cite

Article views: 143 | PDF Downloads: 149



project-based learning, innovations, technology transfer, projects


Al Mulhim, E., & Eldokhny, A. (2020). The impact of collaborative group size on students’ achievement and product quality in project-based learning environments. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn, 15, 157–174. DOI:

Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369–398.

Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the PBL implementation hurdle: Supporting the efforts of K–12 educators. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 40–54. DOI:

Gómez-Pablos, V. B., del Pozo, M. M., & Muñoz-Repiso, A. G. V. (2017). Project-based learning (PBL) through the incorporation of digital technologies: An evaluation based on the experience of serving educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 501–512. DOI:

Kilpatrick, W. (1918). The project method. The Use of the Purposeful Act in the Educative Process. Educators college record, Vol. 19, No. 4, 11–52.

Loyens, S. M. M., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2017). Instruction based on inquiry. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 405-431). New York, NY: Routledge.

Moallem, M. (2019). Effects of PBL on Learning Outcomes, Knowledge Acquisition, and Higher-Order Thinking Skills. In The Wiley Handbook of Problem-Based Learning (eds M. Moallem, W. Hung and N. Dabbagh).

Office of Educational Technology (2015). Ed tech developer’s guide. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Omelyanenko, V., Semenets-Orlova, I., Khomeriki, O., Lyasota, L., & Medviedieva, Yu. (2018). Technology transfer management culture (education-based approach). Probl. Perspect. Manag., 16(3), 454–463.

Pecore, J. L. (2015). From Kilpatrick’s project method to project-based learning. In M. Y. Eryaman & B. C. Bruce (Eds.), International handbook of progressive education (pp. 155–171). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

Prokopenko, O., Kudrina, O., & Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Analysis of ICT application in technology transfer management within Industry 4.0 conditions (Education Based Approach). In: ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer. Proceedings of 14th International Conference, vol. I: Main Conference, pp. 258–273.

Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definition and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1, 9–20.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. E-source:

Tirto, T., Ossik, Y., & Omelyanenko, V. (2020). ICT Support for Industry 4.0 Innovation Networks: Education and Technology Transfer Issues. In: Ivanov, V., et al. Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II. DSMIE 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham.

U.S. Department of Education (2017). Reimagining the Role of Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update. E-source:

Wei, W., Yongquan, D., & Miao, Y. (2020). The impact of cooperative learning on students' learning outcomes: A meta-analysis based on 48 experimental or quasi-experimental studies. Shanghai J. Educ. Res., 07, 34–40+59.

Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2017). The effects of problem-based, project-based, and case-based learning on students' motivation: A meta-analysis. 2017 annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Antonio, TX.

Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study. Front. Psychol, 14:1202728.

Chiu, Th. K. F., Chih-Yuan Sun, J., & Ismailov, M. (2022). Investigating the relationship of technology learning support to digital literacy from the perspective of self-determination theory. Educational Psychology, 42:10, 1263–1282.

Sterlacchini, A. (2008). R&D, higher education and regional growth: Uneven linkages among European regions. Res. Policy, 37, 1096–1107.

Oosterbeek, H., van Praag, M., & Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial skills and motivation. Eur. Econ. Rev., 54, 442–454. DOI:

Pateli, A. G., & Giaglis, G. M. (2005). Technology innovation-induced business model change: a contingency approach. J. Organ. Change Manag,. 18:167e183. DOI:

Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: a systematic review of the evidence. Int. Small Business J., 25, 479–510.

Walter, S. G., Parboteeah, K. P., & Walter, A. (2013). University departments and self-employment intentions of business students: a cross-level analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory Pract., 37, 175–200.

Fuente, J., Vera, M. M. (2010). Educational psychology and RD&I: a strategic action program for the twenty-first century. Papeles Psicólogo, 31, 162–170.

Ergül, N. R., & Kargın, E. K. (2014). The effect of project based learning on students’ science success. Procedia. Soc. Behav. Sci., 136, 537–541.

Castro-Vargas, C., Cabana-Caceres, M., & Andrade-Arenas, L. (2020). Impact of project-based learning on networking and communications competences. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl, 11:2020. DOI: