FACTOR STRATIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS AS PARTICIPANTS IN THE DOMESTIC GOVERNMENT BORROWING MARKET

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Sep 30, 2025

  Andriy Zhukov

Abstract

In the context of open aggression against Ukraine, and taking into account the war of attrition, which leads to increased defence spending and budget deficits, the state should promote the development of the domestic government borrowing market (hereinafter referred to as DGBM) by attracting temporarily available funds from individual investors to purchase government bonds. In order to align the interests of the state and individual investors in the DGBM, it is necessary to conduct factor stratification to determine the priority of factors influencing their investment behaviour. The subject of the study is the investment behaviour of individual investors in the domestic government borrowing market. The purpose of the study is to identify factors influencing the investment behaviour of individual investors as key participants in the DGBM and to stratify them in order to increase investment in government securities to support Ukraine's economy during martial law and ensure financing for post-war reconstruction. The scientific and theoretical basis for the study of factor stratification of individual investors as participants in the domestic government borrowing market consists of methods such as dialectical, generalisation, economic-statistical, analytical, and induction. The factor stratification of individual investors in Ukraine's domestic government borrowing market has enabled us to draw several important conclusions. Firstly, it has been established that factor stratification is a dynamic process of dividing factors that influence the behaviour of individual investors on the DGBM according to a hierarchical principle, which allows for their differentiation and prioritisation. Secondly, the main groups of factors influencing the behaviour of individual investors on the DGBM in the current conditions have been determined and divided according to priority into economic, personal, demographic, fiscal and legal factors. Thirdly, it is argued that the factor stratification of individual investors should form the basis for the development of state investment policy and the strategy for the development of the domestic government borrowing market (DGBM) in order to attract free funds from individual investors to purchase domestic government bonds (DGB), in particular military bonds. Fourthly, there is a proven need for the authorities and regulators of the DGBM not only to ensure growth in the volume of domestic government bond purchases, but also to verify that individual investors have obtained the funds for their purchase legally.

How to Cite

Zhukov, A. (2025). FACTOR STRATIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL INVESTORS AS PARTICIPANTS IN THE DOMESTIC GOVERNMENT BORROWING MARKET. Economics and Education, 10(3), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2025-3-7
Article views: 7 | PDF Downloads: 5

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

household savings, individual investor resources, household investments, factor stratification, public debt, domestic public borrowing market, financial system

References

The State Statistics Service of Ukraine. E-source: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/

Dubyna, M. V., Zhuk, O. S., & Bondarenko, L. M. (2018) Features of the trust institute formation on the financial services market. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia, 2(1(13), 91–99.

Economy of Ukrainian IEs in real time. Opendatabot. E-source: https://opendatabot.ua/open/foponomics

Financial literacy, financial inclusion and financial well-being in Ukraine in 2021. E-source: https://bank.gov.ua/admin_uploads/article/Research_Financial_Literacy_Inclusion_Welfare_2021.pdf

United Nations Population Fund. E-source: https://ukraine.unfpa.org/uk

Karpinskyi, B. A. (2020) Behavioral finance and state-building patriotism of the nation: motivation for decision-making. Science and education: problems, prospects and innovations. Abstracts of I International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kyoto, Japan, 7-9 October 2020. 224–233.

Karpyshyn, N. (2015) Investment behavior of households: global models and national characteristics. World of Finance, 4, 138–151.

Liutyi, I. O., & Miedviedkova, N. S. (2023) The modern paradigm of the state's financial policy and the peculiarities of its implementation in conditions of war on the territory of Ukraine. Finance of Ukraine, 6, 61–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33763/finukr2023.06.061

Milan P., & Eid W. Jr. (2017) Investment Portfolios in an Emerging Economy: What Drives Portfolio’s Diversification? Emerging Markets Journal. Vol. 7, no. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/emaj.2017.120

The Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. E-source: https://thedigital.gov.ua/projects

Mintautė, M., & Lezgovko, A. (2021). Gender Impact on Personal Investment Strategies. Economics and Culture. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 32–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2021-0003

The National Bank of Ukraine. E-source: https://bank.gov.ua/files/ES/Perekaz_y.pdf

Nikiforov, P., & Marych, M. (2023) The place of morality in the theoretical scheme of behavioral finance: statement of the problem. Economy and Society, 54. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-54-90

Reiter-Gavish L., Qadan M., & Yagil J. (2022). Investors' personal characteristics and trading decisions under distressed market conditions. Borsa Istanbul Review. Vol. 22, Issue 2. P. 240-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.04.005

Robba M., Sorgente A., & Iannello P. (2024). In search of socially responsible investors: a Latent Profile Analysis. Frontiers in Behavioral Economics. Vol. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frbhe.2024.1369261

Shyshkov, S. Ye. (2022) Attracting individual investors to the stock market of Ukraine: technologies and tools. Ukrainian Society, 3, 64–83. E-source: http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0001368646

Singh, D., Malik, G., Jain, P., & Abouraia, M. (2024) A systematic review and research agenda on the causes and consequences of financial overconfidence. Cogent Economics & Finance. Vol. 12, no. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2348543

Suciu, Т. (2015) From the classical finance to the behavioral finance. Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law. Vol. 4, no. 7. pp. 80–88. E-source: https://doaj.org/article/11b58a1142574a24b68e65500771dc45

Varnalii, Z. S. (2019) Investment security of Ukraine in the context of financial globalization / Modernization of public finances of Ukraine in the context of European choice: monograph / Scientific editors: I.O. Lyuty, V.B. Tropina : ChNTU, 140–157.