ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FORMATION OF CULTURAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE DESIGNERS: THE DIDACTIC ASPECT OF THE CREATIVE ECONOMY

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Jun 30, 2026

  Tetiana Zubko

  Marianna Adamovska

Abstract

The subject of this study is the didactic potential of artificial intelligence in the formation of cultural competence among future designers in the context of the creative economy. The article considers cultural competence as an integral professional quality that combines cultural awareness, visual sensitivity, critical interpretation of cultural codes, intercultural communication, ethical responsibility, and the ability to transform cultural experience into design solutions. The aim of the study is to provide a theoretical substantiation of artificial intelligence as a didactic mediator between cultural experience, reflective analysis, and creative design practice. The research methodology is based on an interdisciplinary approach that integrates competence-based education, cultural studies, design pedagogy, digital didactics, concepts of AI literacy, and the theory of creative industries. The study employs theoretical analysis, synthesis, comparison, and pedagogical modelling to clarify the role of artificial intelligence tools in educational practices related to cultural observation, visual research, concept development, and project-based learning. The findings demonstrate that artificial intelligence can help students structure cultural impressions, identify semantic connections, compare visual systems, generate design references, and reflectively comprehend the cultural meanings of creative products. At the same time, artificial intelligence cannot replace personal experience of cultural immersion, the pedagogical role of the teacher, or the student’s authorial position. The conclusions emphasise that the effective integration of AI into design education requires a human-centred pedagogical model, ethical regulation, critical evaluation of algorithmic outputs, and the development of AI literacy. Such an approach contributes to the preparation of future designers capable of creating culturally meaningful, innovative, and socially responsible products in the creative economy.

How to Cite

Zubko, T., & Adamovska, M. (2026). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE FORMATION OF CULTURAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE DESIGNERS: THE DIDACTIC ASPECT OF THE CREATIVE ECONOMY. Economics and Education, 11(2), 94-100. https://doi.org/10.30525/2500-946X/2026-2-13
Article views: 9 | PDF Downloads: 6

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

artificial intelligence, design education, cultural competence, creative economy, digital didactics, AI literacy, cultural experience, future designers

References

Alieksieieva, S. V. (2024). Didactic principles of individualization of learning in the conditions of modern education. Kyiv: Institute of Pedagogy of the NAES of Ukraine.

Alieksieieva, S., & Adamovska, M. (2025). Education in the context of the development of creative industries: features of professional training of future designers. Moderni aspekty vedy: LV. Dil mizhnarodnoi kolektyvnoi monohrafii. Czech Republic: Mezinarodni Ekonomicky Institut s.r.o., 109–121.

Antonovych, Ye. A. (2009). Decorative and applied art. Lviv: Svit.

Danylenko, V. Ya. (2003). Design. Kharkiv: KhDADM.

Danylenko, V. Ya. (2005). Design of Ukraine in the world context of artistic and project culture. Kharkiv: KhDADM; Koloryt.

European Commission. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

European Commission. (2022). Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Cultural and Creative Sectors. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Institute of Pedagogy of the NAES of Ukraine (2024). Scientific activity of the Institute of Pedagogy of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: UNESCO.

OECD. (2021). AI and the Future of Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Ovcharuk, O. V. (Ed.). (2004). Competence approach in modern education: world experience and Ukrainian perspectives. Kyiv: K.I.S.

Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. (2024). Official Journal of the European Union.

Rudnytska, O. P. (2005). Pedagogy: general and artistic. Ternopil: Navchalna knyha — Bohdan.

Schauer, S., & Simbeck, K. (2024). AI Literacy for Cultural and Design Studies. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 2, 39–50.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.

UNCTAD. (2022). Creative Economy Outlook 2022: The International Year of Creative Economy for Sustainable Development: Pathway to Resilient Creative Industries. Geneva: United Nations.

UNESCO. (2021). AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-makers. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2022). Re|Shaping Policies for Creativity: Addressing Culture as a Global Public Good. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). AI Competency Framework for Students. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). AI Competency Framework for Teachers. Paris: UNESCO.