CULTURAL HERITAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION PRACTICES: EXPERIENCE OF UKRAINE AND THE BALTIC STATES
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to analyze digitization as a global trend of the early 21st century and to develop a cultural model for studying the scope of application of digital transformation practices as a new way to preserve and promote cultural heritage based on the experience of the Baltic States and Ukraine. The study of the impact of digital transformation practices in the field of cultural heritage in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Ukraine has demonstrated the need to deepen ties between these countries by establishing a cultural dialogue, exchanging information and experience on the use of technological innovations in the field of cultural heritage, as well as increasing the value and content of joint cultural projects. Methodology. The theoretical basis and methodology of the study is the historical and cultural method, which contributed to the study of the historical dynamics of digitization; typological and comparative methods – for the study and analysis of cultural heritage objects as phenomena and artifacts. A special role is played by the cultural method, which is meaning-forming through the study of interdependent cultural processes – representation, identity, etc. Results. The authors, involving the professional community, which emphasizes the problem of the lack of a general electronic register of cultural heritage sites in Ukraine, as well as the lack of a strategy for digitizing such sites, draw attention to the fact that the situation began to change rapidly in 2022. It has been proved that the experience of Estonia (museum information system MuIS, five-year action plan for the digitization of cultural heritage for 2018-2023), Latvia (project "Digitization of cultural heritage content"), Lithuania (creation of the Council for the Digitization of Lithuanian Cultural Heritage, virtual electronic information system of cultural heritage VEPIS, museum information system LIMIS) will contribute to the strengthening of technological and cultural innovations in the field of protection and promotion of cultural heritage of Ukraine. Digitization is a task that requires significant financial and intellectual investments, but the authors prove that this direction can become a source of income for creative industries (economic value) and a resource for creating new meanings (symbolic value). Practical implications. The analyzed experience of the Baltic countries will be a valuable source of information for intensifying digital transformation in Ukraine. Deepening Ukraine's cultural ties with Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in order to exchange experience in the field of cultural heritage is of practical importance, as a number of implemented Baltic projects will help Ukrainian specialists to increase the efficiency of using modern technological tools in the field of culture. The article pays attention to European and Ukrainian public and private cultural projects and initiatives that are being implemented to digitize the preservation and promotion of historical and cultural heritage. Value/originality. It is advisable to study the prospects of cultural heritage tokenization and NFT as a tool for preserving, supporting and promoting cultural heritage.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
digital culture, digital transformation, cultural heritage, museum information system, digital museum, cultural policy
Aljas, A., & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. P. (2009). Mäluasutuste töötajad digitaalse kultuuripärandi tarbijatena ja loojatena (Employees of memory institutions as consumers and creators of digital cultural heritage). Eesti Rahva Muuseumi aastaraamat, vol. 52, pp. 114–129. Available at: https://ojs.erm.ee/index.php/ermer/article/view/59 (accessed September 9, 2022)
Andrianova, O. B., Biskulova, S. O., Zhivkova, O. V., Timchenko, T. R., & Chueva, K. E. (2019). Nauka. Mystetstvo. Studii. Osvita. Tekhnolohichni doslidzhennia tvoriv mystetstva z kolektsii Muzeiu Khanenkiv [Science. Art. Studios. Education. Technological studies of works of art from the collection of the Khanenki Museum]: Kyiv: «Feniks». (in Ukrainian)
Artifact Magazine media platform (2021) Didzhytalizatsiya vysokoho mystetstva. U Poltavi stvoryuyutʹ tsyfrovyy arkhiv kartyn Mykoly Yaroshenka (Digitization of high art. A digital archive of Mykola Yaroshenko's paintings is being created in Poltava). Available at: https://artefact.org.ua/mistetstvo/didzhytalizacziya-vysokogo-mystecztva-u-poltavi-stvoryuyut-czyfrovyj-arhiv-kartyn-mykoly-yaroshenka.html (accessed August 18, 2022)
Dnistrovyi, A. (2021). Diana Klochko: «Otsyfrovuvannia muzeinykh fondiv mozhe zminyty uiavlennia pro Ukrainu. U samykh ukraintsiv i u sviti». Available at: https://lb.ua/culture/2021/03/31/481208_diana_klochko_otsifrovuvannya.html (accessed September 4, 2022)
Dychkovskyi, S. I (2019). Komodyfikatsiia kulturnoi spadshchyny v systemi turystychnykh posluh (Commodification of cultural heritage in the system of tourist services). Ukrainska kultura: mynule, suchasne, shliakhy rozvytku – Ukrainian culture: past, present, ways of development, vol. 33, pp. 66–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.vi33.291
Havrilova, L., & Topolnyk, Ya. (2017). Tsyfrova kultura, tsyfrova hramotnist, tsyfrova kompetentnist yak suchasni osvitni fenomeny (Digital culture, digital literacy, digital competence as modern educational phenomena). Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia – Information technologies and teaching, vol. 61 (5). Available at: https://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/download/-1744/1243. (accessed September 4, 2022)
Hlushchuk, O. H., & Karpets, V. (2019). Svitovi tendentsii prezentatsii muzeiamy istoryko-kulturnoi spadshchyny u formati suchasnykh tsyfrovykh tekhnolohii (World trends in the presentation of historical and cultural heritage by museums in the format of modern digital technologies). Ukrainska kultura: mynule, suchasne, shliakhy rozvytku – Ukrainian culture: past, present, ways of development, vol. 33, pp. 74–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35619/ucpmk.vi33.292
Kopiievska, O. (2010). Kulturna funktsiia derzhavy v konteksti natsionalnoho derzhavotvorennia: monohrafiia [The cultural function of the state in the context of national state-building monograph]. Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv. (in Ukrainian)
Kotsiubivska, K., & Baranskyi, S. (2020). 3D-modeliuvannia pry vidnovlenni istoryko-kulturnykh tsinnostei (3D modeling in the restoration of historical and cultural values). Tsyfrova platforma: informatsiini tekhnolohii v sotsiokulturnii sferi – Digital platform: information technologies in the socio-cultural sphere, vol. 3(1), pp. 59–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796x.3.1.2020.206109
Laak, M., Viires, P., & Sarv, M. (2020). Digikultuuri väljakutseid. Kultuuripärandi kasutamine humanitaarteaduses ja hariduses (The Challenges of Digital Culture. Use of Digital Cultural Heritage in Research and Education). Methis. Studia humaniora Estonica, vol. 21(26). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7592/methis.v21i26.16906
Latvijas Nacionālā arhīva (2019). Uzsākta projekta “Kultūras mantojuma satura digitalizācija (2.kārta)” īstenošana (Implementation of the project "Digitalization of cultural heritage content (2nd round)" has started.). Available at: https://www.arhivi.gov.lv/lv/jaunums/uzsakta-projekta-kulturas-mantojuma-satura-digitalizacija-2karta-istenosana (accessed September 12, 2022)
Laužikas, R., & Varnienė-Janssen, R. (2015). Heritage and society: strategic guidelines for the digitization of the Lithuanian cultural heritage for the 2014–2020 programming period. Information & Media, vol. 69, pp. 118–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2014.69.5102
Lelyk, M. B. (2019). Rozvytok tsyfrovoi kultury ta didzhytalizatsiia muzeiv: dosvid uprovadzhennia ta vykorystannia tsyfrovykh tekhnolohii muzeiamy svitu (Development of digital culture and digitalization of museums: the experience of the implementation and use of digital technologies by museums of the world). Ohliadova dovidka za materialamy presy, internetu ta neopublikovanymy dokumentamy za 2017–2019 rr. – Review of materials from the press, the Internet and unpublished documents for 2017–2019, vol. 3/4. Available at: https://nlu.org.ua/storage/files/Infocentr/Tematich_ogliadi/2019/muzei.pdf (accessed September 2, 2022)
Lietuvos nacionalinė Martyno Mažvydo biblioteka (2021). Virtualios elektroninio paveldo informacinės sistemos plėtra pereina į kitą etapą (The development of the virtual electronic heritage information system is moving to the next stage). Available at: https://www.lnb.lt/naujienos/7885-virtualios-elektroninio-paveldo-informacines-sistemos-pletra-pereina-i-kita-etapa (accessed September 10, 2022)
Lietuvos Respublikos kultūros ministerija (2022). Kultūros viceministras R. Mikaitis: «Lietuva su Lenkija pasirengusios teikti reikiamą pagalbą Ukrainos kultūros paveldo skaitmenizavimo projektui» (Deputy Minister of Culture R. Mikaitis: "Lithuania and Poland are ready to provide the necessary assistance for the digitization project of Ukrainian cultural heritage"). Available at: https://lrkm.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/kulturos-viceministras-r-mikaitis-lietuva-su-lenkija-pasirengusios-teikti-reikiama-pagalba-ukrainos-kulturos-paveldo-skaitmenizavimo-projektui (accessed September 5, 2022)
Manžuch, Z. (2017). Ethical Issues In Digitization Of Cultural Hertiage. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies: Vol. 4, Article 4. Available at: http://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol4/iss2/4
Manžuch, Z., Huvila, I., & Aparac-Jelušić, T. (2005). Digitization of cultural heritage. European curriculum reflections on library and information science education, 37–65. Available at: https://arkiv.iva.ku.dk//hyperion/423.pdf (accessed September 12, 2022)
Meškelevičienė, L. (2009). Rinkinių skaitmeninimas Lietuvos dailės muziejuje (Digitization of collections in the Lithuanian Art Museum). Relevant Tomorrow, 15–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51740/rt.vi.474
Ministry of Culture and Information Policy of Ukraine (2022). Koshty z prodazhu NFT-artiv dopomozhut vidnovyty zruinovani rosiianamy kulturni obiekty Ukrainy (Funds from the sale of NFT-arts will help restore cultural objects of Ukraine destroyed by the Russians). Available at: https://mkip.gov.ua/news/7451.html (accessed September 9, 2022)
Ministry of Culture of Estonia (2022). Available at: https://www.kul.ee/kultuurivaartused-ja-digitaalne-kultuuriparand/digitaalne-kultuuriparand/kultuuriparandi (accessed September 12, 2022)
Mishchenko, M. (2020). Suchasni sposoby materializatsii pamiati pro obiekty kulturnoi spadshchyny, yaki perebuvat pid zahrozoiu znyshchennia (Modern methods of materializing the memory of cultural heritage objects that are under the threat of destruction) Kulturolohichna dumka – The Culturology Ideas, vol. 17, pp. 130–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37627/2311-9489-17-2020-1.130-138
Musiienko, N. (2019). Yevropeiskyi rik kulturnoi spadshchyny: Istoriia, meta ta stratehichni zavdannia (European Year of Cultural Heritage: History, Purpose and Strategic Tasks). Naukovyi zhurnal Khudozhnia kultura. Aktualni problemy – Scientific journal Art Culture. Actual Problems, vol. 15(2), pp. 35–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31500/1992-5514.15(2).2019.186123
National Heritage Board (2021). Aktualitātes Kultūras mantojuma digitalizācijas projektos 2021. gada sākumā (Current affairs in cultural heritage digitization projects at the beginning of 2021). Available at: https://www.nkmp.gov.lv/lv/aktualitates-kulturas-mantojuma-digitalizacijas-projektos-2021-gada-sakuma (accessed September 9, 2022)
Official Journal of the European Union (2014) Council conclusions of 21 May 2014 on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52014XG0614%2808%29 (accessed September 09, 2022)
Ojamaa, M., & Torop, P. (2020). Kultuuripärand ja digitaalne lugemine: raamatu ja platvormi vahel (Cultural heritage and digital reading: between book and platform). Methis. Studia humaniora Estonica, vol. 21(26). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7592/methis.v21i26
Prykhodko, L. (2019). Zberezhennia tsyfrovoi kulturnoi spadshchyny – imperatyv XXI stolittia (za dokumentamy YuNESKO i Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu) (Preservation of digital cultural heritage is an imperative of the 21st century (according to UNESCO and European Union documents)). Arkhivy Ukrainy: naukovo-praktychnyi zhurnal – Archives of Ukraine: a scientific and practical journal, vol. 2, pp. 67–92. Available at: https://au.archives.gov.ua/index.php/au/article/view/57 (accessed September 12, 2022)
Riga Technical University (2022). RTU zinātnieki veic 3D mērījumus, lai saglabātu Ukrainā karā izpostītās kultūras vērtības (RTU scientists make 3D measurements to preserve cultural values destroyed in the Ukraine war). Available at: https://www.rtu.lv/lv/universitate/masu-medijiem/zinas/atvert/rtu-zinatnieki-veic-3d-merijumus-lai-saglabatu-ukraina-kara-izpostitas-kulturas-vertibas (accessed September 7, 2022)
Rusakov, S. (2020). Teoretychna model koloobihu kultury yak kulturolohichnyi pidkhid u vyvchenni fenomeniv suchasnoi kultury (The theoretical model of the circulation of culture as a culturological approach in the study of the phenomena of modern culture). Pytannia kulturolohii – Issues in Cultural Studies, vol. 36, pp. 24–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2410-1311.36.2020.221040
Trach, Yu. (2020). Ukrainskyi dosvid VR-rekonstruktsii obiektiv istoryko-kulturnoi spadshchyny (Ukrainian experience of VR-reconstruction of historical and cultural heritage objects). Tsyfrova platforma: informatsiini tekhnolohii v sotsiokulturnii sferi – Digital platform: information technologies in the socio-cultural sphere, vol. 3(2), pp. 148–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796x.3.2.2020.220588
Trehub, H. (2019). Movoiu pikseliv ta baitiv (In the language of pixels and bytes). Ukrainskyi tyzhden – The Ukrainian week, vol. 37 (617). Available at: https://tyzhden.ua/Culture/235178 (accessed September 10, 2022)
Ukrinform (2019) Dosvid Lytvy y Estoniyi dopomozhe pryshvydshyty tsyfrovu transformatsiyu – Fedorov (The experience of Lithuania and Estonia will help speed up digital transformation – Fedorov). Available at: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/2826810-dosvid-litvi-j-estonii-dopomoze-prisvidsiti-cifrovu-transformaciu-fedorov.html (accessed September 9, 2022)
Volynets, V. (2021). Tsyfrovi tekhnolohii u sferi kultury: teoretyzatsiia problemy tsyfrovykh danykh i kulturnoi spadshchyny (Digital technologies in the field of culture: theorizing the problem of digital data and cultural heritage). Tsyfrova platforma: informatsiini tekhnolohii v sotsiokulturnii sferi – Digital Platform: Information Technologies in the Sociocultural Sphere, 4(2), 195–205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31866/2617-796X.4.2.2021.247481
Yavorska, T. (2021). Transformatsiini protsesy u suspilnii ta sotsiokulturnii sferakh Ukrainy: monohrafiia [Transformational processes in the social and sociocultural spheres of Ukraine: monograph]. Vinnytsia: DonNU imeni Vasylia Stusa. (in Ukrainian)
Zariņš, U. (2012). Nacionālo digitalizācijas stratēģiju mērķi un uzdevumi (National digitalization strategy goals and objectives). Available at: http://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/26555 (accessed September 12, 2022)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.