PROFITABILITY IN A RESOURCE-BASED INDUSTRY: EVIDENCE FROM ICELANDIC FISHERIES, 1990–2022
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
This study examines the long-term profitability of Iceland’s fisheries sector, which has always played a vital role in the country’s economy. Since the 1980s, the industry has been managed under an Individual Transferable Quota (ITQ) system. This rights-based approach limits access to fish stocks by allocating tradable quotas to individual operators. The system was introduced primarily to reduce fleet overcapacity and stop mounting financial losses. While it has clearly transformed the industry, the long-term factors behind profitability under the ITQ regime have not been systematically analyzed at the sector level over an extended period. The purpose of this study is to identify and quantify the main drivers of profitability in Icelandic fisheries from 1990 to 2022. The analysis focuses on how economic conditions, operational efficiency, and institutional change have shaped profitability over time. Profitability is measured as earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) from both harvesting and processing, plus the fishing fee, expressed as a share of total export revenues. To explore this, the study applies a simple regression-based methodology using annual data over 33 years. Four explanatory variables are included: the real exchange rate of the Icelandic króna, catch efficiency (measured as catch per unit of oil consumed), a real export price index in U.S. dollars, and a linear time trend capturing structural and institutional developments. The model explains 88 percent of the variation in profitability, indicating strong explanatory power. The results show that the real exchange rate has the most significant short-term effect. A stronger króna reduces profits, reflecting the export-oriented nature of the sector. As expected, higher export prices and improved fuel efficiency contribute positively to profitability. However, the most important long-term factor is the positive time trend, which reflects gradual gains from quota consolidation, better management practices, and technological progress—developments reinforced by the ITQ system itself. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the ITQ framework has supported sustained profitability by enabling long-term adaptation and structural reform. Although short-term outcomes remain sensitive to external shocks, the sector has become more resilient and financially stable. These insights may prove useful for other countries seeking to design effective governance systems for natural resource industries.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
profitability, fisheries, exchange rate, Iceland, resource governance
Andersen, P., Andersen, J. L., & Frost, H. (2010). ITQs in Denmark and Resource Rent Gains. Marine Resource Economics, 25(1), 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-25.1.11
Árnason, R. (1993). The Icelandic Individual Transferable Quota System: A Descriptive Account. Marine Resource Economics, 8(3), 201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/mre.8.3.42629066
Árnason, R. (2009). Fisheries management and operations research. European Journal of Operational Research, 193(3), 741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.028
Árnason, R. (2012). Property Rights in Fisheries: How Much Can Individual Transferable Quotas Accomplish? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6(2), 217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/res011
Árnason, R. (2013). Individual Transferable Quotas in Fisheries. In Elsevier eBooks (p. 183). Elsevier BV. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-375067-9.00058-9
Bilms, K. (2023). The Cod Wars and Lessons for Maritime Counterinsurgency. Available at: https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2023/february/cod-wars-and-lessons-maritime-counterinsurgency
Brandt, S. (2005). The equity debate: distributional impacts of individual transferable quotas. Ocean & Coastal Management, 48(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2004.12.012
Brinson, A. A., & Thunberg, E. M. (2016). Performance of federally managed catch share fisheries in the United States. Fisheries Research, 179, 213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.03.008
Byrne, C., Agnarsson, S., & Davíðsdóttir, B. (2021). Fuel Intensity in Icelandic fisheries and opportunities to reduce emissions. Marine Policy, 127, 104448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104448
Byrne, C., Agnarsson, S., Davíðsdóttir, B., & Oostdijk, M. (2020). Species-level quota concentration in the Icelandic harvesting sector. Marine Policy, 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104108
Chambers, C., & Carothers, C. (2017). Thirty years after privatization: A survey of Icelandic small-boat fishermen. Marine Policy, 80, 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.026
Chambers, C., Helgadóttir, G., & Carothers, C. (2017). “Little kings”: community, change and conflict in Icelandic fisheries. MAST. Maritime Studies/Maritime Studies, 16(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0064-6
Chu, C. (2009). Thirty years later: the global growth of ITQs and their influence on stock status in marine fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 10(2), 217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00313.x
Danielsen, R., & Agnarsson, S. (2018). Fisheries policy in the Faroe Islands: Managing for failure? Marine Policy, 94, 204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.05.010
Daníelsson, Á. (1997). Fisheries management in Iceland. Ocean & Coastal Management, 35, 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0964-5691(97)00029-x
Directorate of Fisheries. (n.d.). Official website. Available at: https://island.is/s/fiskistofa
Edwards, D. N., & Pinkerton, E. (2019). Rise of the investor class in the British Columbia Pacific halibut fishery. Marine Policy, 109, 103676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103676
Einarsson, N. (2011). Fisheries Governance and Social Discourse in Post-Crisis Iceland: Responses to the UN Human Rights Committee’s Views in Case 1306/2004. The Yearbook of Polar Law Online, 3(1), 479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22116427-91000068
Eythórsson, E. (1996). Coastal Communities and ITQ Management. The Case of Icelandic Fisheries. Sociologia Ruralis, 36(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00017.x
Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. (1990). The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-two years later. Human Ecology, 18(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00889070
Garrity, E. J. (2011). System Dynamics Modeling of Individual Transferable Quota Fisheries and Suggestions for Rebuilding Stocks. Sustainability, 3(1), 184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su3010184
Grafton, R. Q., & McIlgorm, A. (2009). Ex ante evaluation of the costs and benefits of individual transferable quotas: A case-study of seven Australian commonwealth fisheries. Marine Policy, 33(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.02.001
Guillen, J., & Maynou, F. (2016). Increasing Fuel Prices, Decreasing Fish Prices and Low Productivity Lead to Poor Economic Performance and Capacity Reduction in the Fishing Sector. Available at: https://www.trjfas.org/uploads/pdf_922.pdf
Gunnlaugsson, S. B., & Agnarsson, S. (2019). Late arrival: The development of resource rent in Icelandic fisheries. Fisheries Research, 214, 126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2019.02.007
Gunnlaugsson, S. B., Kristófersson, D. M., & Agnarsson, S. (2018). Fishing for a fee: Resource rent taxation in Iceland’s fisheries. Ocean & Coastal Management, 163, 141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.06.001
Gunnlaugsson, S. B., Sævaldsson, H., Kristófersson, D. M., Agnarsson, S., & Ishimura, G. (2021). Derby versus ITQ: Iceland’s coastal fisheries explained and compared to its ITQ-managed fisheries. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 42, 101665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101665
Gunnlaugsson, S. B., & Valtýsson, H. Þ. (2022). Sustainability and wealth creation, but no consensus: Recent decades in Iceland’s ITQ-managed fisheries. Marine Policy, 135, 104836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104836
Hannesson, R. (2013). Norway’s experience with ITQs. Marine Policy, 37, 264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.008
Holm, P., Raakjær, J., Jacobsen, R. B., & Henriksen, E. (2015). Contesting the social contracts underpinning fisheries—Lessons from Norway, Iceland and Greenland. Marine Policy, 55, 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.011
Knútsson, Ö., Kristófersson, D. M., & Gestsson, H. (2016). The effects of fisheries management on the Icelandic demersal fish value chain. Marine Policy, 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.015
Kokorsch, M., & Benediktsson, K. (2018). Prosper or perish? The development of Icelandic fishing villages after the privatisation of fishing rights. MAST. Maritime Studies, 17(1), 69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0089-5
Kokorsch, M., Karlsdóttir, A., & Benediktsson, K. (2015). Improving or overturning the ITQ system? Views of stakeholders in Icelandic fisheries. MAST. Maritime Studies, 14(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-015-0033-x
Kristófersson, D. M., Gunnlaugsson, S. B., & Valtýsson, H. Þ. (2021). Factors affecting greenhouse gas emissions in fisheries: evidence from Iceland’s demersal fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 78(7), 2385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab109
Mace, P. M., Sullivan, K., & Cryer, M. (2014). The evolution of New Zealand’s fisheries science and management systems under ITQs†. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71(2), 204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst159
Matthíasson, Þ. (2003). Closing the open sea: Development of fishery management in four Icelandic fisheries. Natural Resources Forum, 27(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00065-i1
Nielsen, M., Hoff, A., Nielsen, R., Andersen, P., Waldo, S., Hammarlund, C., Kristófersson, D. M., Sævaldsson, H., Virtanen, J., Setälä, ari, Roll, K. H., Asche, F., Rógvi, H. á, & Ellefsen, H. (2018). Structural Adjustment and Regulation of Nordic Fisheries until 2025. In TemaNord. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6027/tn2018-547
Oostdijk, M., Byrne, C., Stefánsson, G., Santos, M. J., & Woods, P. J. (2020). Catch–quota matching allowances balance economic and ecological targets in a fishery managed by individual transferable quota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(40), 24771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008001117
Oostdijk, M., Santos, M. J., Agnarsson, S., & Woods, P. J. (2019). Structure and evolution of cod quota market networks in Iceland over times of financial volatility. Ecological Economics, 159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.035
Putten, I. van, Boschetti, F., Fulton, E. A., Smith, A. D. M., & Thébaud, O. (2014). Individual transferable quota contribution to environmental stewardship: a theory in need of validation. Ecology and Society, 19(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06466-190235
Radarinn.is. (n.d.). Retrieved January 27, 2025, from https://radarinn.is/
Sigfusson, T. I., Árnason, R., & Morrissey, K. (2013). The economic importance of the Icelandic fisheries cluster—Understanding the role of fisheries in a small economy. Marine Policy, 39, 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.015
Soliman, A. (2014). Individual transferable quotas in world fisheries: Addressing legal and rights-based issues. Ocean & Coastal Management, 87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.09.012
Standal, D., & Aarset, B. (2008). The IVQ regime in Norway: A stable alternative to an ITQ regime? Marine Policy, 32(4), 663. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.11.007
Statistics Iceland. (n.d.). Fisheries. Retrieved January 29, 2025, from https://hagstofa.is/talnaefni/atvinnuvegir/sjavarutvegur/
The nominal and real exchange rate (2025). Available at: https://www.cnb.cz/en/faq/What-is-the-nominal-and-real-exchange-rate/
Tirrell, A. (2017). Sociocultural institutions in Norwegian fisheries management. Marine Policy, 77, 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.12.002
Valle, I. del, Hoefnagel, E. W. J., Astorkiza, K., & Astorkiza, I. (2006). Chapter 3 Right-based fisheries management. In Developments in aquaculture and fisheries science. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9309(06)80006-2
Vigfússon, K., Jóhannsdóttir, L., & Ólafsson, S. (2023). Strategy implementation obstacles: Iceland fishery CEO perspectives. Marine Policy, 147, 105353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105353
Vigfússon, K., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Ólafsson, S., & Köseoğlu, M. A. (2025). Key success factors for implementing strategy in the Icelandic fisheries industry. Journal of Strategy and Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-04-2023-0069
Woods, P. J., Bouchard, C., Holland, D. S., Punt, A. E., & Marteinsdóttir, G. (2015). Catch-quota balancing mechanisms in the Icelandic multi-species demersal fishery: Are all species equal? Marine Policy, 55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.01.004
Yandle, T., & Dewees, C. M. (2008). Consolidation in an Individual Transferable Quota Regime: Lessons from New Zealand, 1986–1999. Environmental Management, 41(6), 915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9081-y
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.