Oksana Safonchyk

  Artem Ripenko


Political corruption as a social phenomenon exists in virtually all countries of the world, including those that most researchers consider as “benchmarks” in terms of the development of democracy. At the same time, there is a steady tendency towards the growth of political corruption and the evolution of corruption practices in developed democratic countries. Problems of political corruption in the professional literature are given a lot of attention but the issues related to the peculiarities of the experience of fighting political corruption in the EU in the context of the introduction of appropriate practices in Ukraine remain insufficiently researched. In the context of reforming the modern Ukrainian society, the study of problems of preventing and counteracting corruption is extremely relevant for a number of reasons: firstly, corrupt practices in the government machinery are the main obstacle to the implementation of any reforms; secondly, the high level of corruption in society, as evidenced by the results of the World CPI Corruption Perception Index 2015, decreases public confidence in the government; thirdly, it is necessary to implement the anti-corruption recommendations of the Action Plan on Visa Liberalization from the European Union (EU); fourthly, the reduction of corruption would contribute to attracting international investment, and so on. The purpose of the article is to identify features of counteraction to corruption in the countries of the European Union and to analyse the formation of government administration as the main precondition for narrowing the corruption space. To achieve this purpose, the following goals were set: to determine the level of implementation of international anti-corruption standards in the government practice of Ukraine; to investigate the formation and development of anti-corruption institutions; to analyse the experience of anti-corruption institutions in the EU; to investigate the formation of informational transparency of government space; to analyse the ratings of Ukraine regarding data openness; to find out the features of E-Declaration models as an element of public control of anti-corruption institutions in the system of public administration. Reaffirming its European aspirations, during 2001–2018, Ukraine ratified several laws in relation to the formation of anti-corruption standards: a) general and on liability for corruption offenses and offenses related to corruption; b) documents on the activities of specialized agencies for fighting corruption; c) documents on ethical rules, anti-corruption restrictions and prohibitions for certain officials and on the prevention of political corruption; d) documents on the prevention of corruption in the economy and sports; e) documents on access to information. This allows asserting that in general the legislative framework for the prevention of corruption in Ukraine has already been established. Despite the adoption of many laws, out of 200 anti-corruption measures, which, according to the State Program for the implementation of the Anticorruption Strategy, had to be implemented by state bodies by the end of 2018, about 35% had not been implemented. Anticorruption strategy for 2019 and subsequent years and the State Program for its implementation do not exist. Many important anti-corruption laws, which would help to further improve the Ukrainian economy, finance, the system of social protection of the population, and so on, were not adopted. Many of the problems that prevent effective use of the data obtained still need to be resolved. It is also necessary to find solutions for defining the electronic declaration of anti-corruption crusaders.

How to Cite

Safonchyk, O., & Ripenko, A. (2019). GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION AS THE MAIN PREREQUISITE FOR NARROWING THE CORRUPTION SPACE. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5(3), 193-202.
Article views: 260 | PDF Downloads: 4



government administration, corruption, anti-corruption bodies, anti-corruption measures, ProZorro, E-Declaration


Analytical portal (2016-2019). Qlik Sense Hub. Retrieved from:

Bocharnikov I.V. (2018). Foreign experience in counteracting corruption. Retrieved from:

Butusov, Yu. (2013). The attempt on the state register: the history of one of the most grateful things in Ukraine. Dzerkalo Tyzhnya, 4.10.2013. Retrieved from:

Bilan, O. (2016). 5 Reforms That Change Ukraine. VoxUkraine, January 7 2016, Retrieved from:

CMU Resolution dated 21.10. 2015. No. 835 "On Approval of the Provisions on Data Sets to be Disclosed in the Form of Open Data". Retrieved from:

Farhan Hameed (2005). Fiscal Transparency and Economic Outcomes, December, 2005. Retrieved from:

Khomenko, S. (2016). What is e-declaration and what's its problem? BBC Ukraine, 28.10. 2016. Retrieved from:

Law of Ukraine (2014). "On the Principles of State Anti-Corruption Policy in Ukraine (Anticorruption Strategy) for 2014-2017" from 14.10. 2014. № 1699-VII. Retrieved from:

Law "On the Principles of State Anti-Corruption Policy in Ukraine (Anticorruption Strategy) for 2014-2017" of October 14, 2014, № 1699-VII. Retrieved from:

Law of Ukraine "On the Openness of the Use of Public Funds" № 183-VIII as of 11 February 2015. Retrieved from:

Law of Ukraine "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning the Determination of the Final Beneficiaries of Legal Persons and Public Figures" № 1701-VII as of 14.10.2014. Retrieved from:

Methodology. The Global Open Data Index (2016). Retrieved from:

NAPC (2016-2019). National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption. Retrieved from:

Official website (2019). Official website of The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from:

Open Data (2019). Open Data: Promise, but not Enough Progress from G20 Countries. Retrieved from:; Introductory Note to the G20 Anti-Corruption Open Data Principles

Porta D. Affairs (2006). Dirty deals: participants, resources and mechanisms of political corruption. Kyiv: K.I.S. Portal of the Supreme Ode of Ukraine. Retrieved from:

Places (2018). The Global Open Data Index. Retrieved from:

Radio Liberty (2016). "The first stage of submission of e-declarations for 2015 ended – more than 118 thousand documents", Radio Liberty, 31.10.2016. Retrieved from:

Romanyuk, B. V. (2009). World experience in the creation and operation of institutions for the prevention and fight against corruption. Scientific and practical journal, 21, 9–16.

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated October 21, 2015, № 835 "On Approval of the Provisions on Data Sets to be Released in the Form of Open Data". Retrieved from:

Svintsitsky, A. (2018). Disclosure of Beneficiary Owners: Formalities on Formalities, LigaZakon. Retrieved from:

State register of real rights to real estate (2019). Retrieved from:

The only public web portal for open data. Retrieved from:

The Open Data Barometer (2016). Retrieved from:

The state register of declarations. Retrieved from:

Ukrainian Open Data Portal. Retrieved from:

Ukraine Against Corruption (2018). Ukraine Against Corruption: Economic Front. Economic evaluation of anti-corruption measures in 2014-2018 – Dnipro: Serednyak T. Retrieved from:

Uniform State Register of Legal Entities, Individual Entrepreneurs and Public Associations. Retrieved from:

Ukraine opened (2017). Ukraine opened up its beneficial ownership data: why it matters and how your country can be next, Open Government Partnership, June 08.2017. Retrieved from: