THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS TO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN FINLAND IN RELATION TO THE CASES OF BANKRUPTCY AND DEBT COLLECTION
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Published:
Dec 3, 2021
Abstract
The article deals with the right of suspects and the accused not to be compelled to testify against themselves or to confess guilt in a criminal trial in Finland during the investigation of cases of bankruptcy and debt collection. ECHR in April 2009 found a violation of Article 6 of the European Convention in Marttinen v. Finland on the basis of which the Supreme Court cancelled 20.10.2009 Finland’s earlier verdict in a criminal case co reference to article 6 of the European Convention. The article discusses the basis and amendments to Finnish legislation with reference to the suspect’s right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
How to Cite
Jilkine, V. (2021). THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS TO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN FINLAND IN RELATION TO THE CASES OF BANKRUPTCY AND DEBT COLLECTION. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (4), 62-72. Retrieved from http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/bjlss/article/view/1506
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Keywords
European Convention on Human Rights, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), the right of a suspect, bankruptcy law, legal precedent, a fair trial
References
1. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pactpol.shtml.
2. European Convention on Human Rights. Rooma, 4 november 1950.http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/rus/treaties/html/005.htm
3. The Constution of Finland. 731/1999. Suomen perustuslaki, Act no. 11.6.1999/731. www.finlex.fi
4. Konkurssilaki (31.1.2013/86). www.finlex.fi
5. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The Code of Enforcement of Finland. Oikeudenkäymiskaari. 1.1.1734/4. www.finlex.fi
6. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Finland. precedent no. KKO:2009:27, 17.4.2009. www.finlex.fi
7. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Finland. precedent no. KKO:2009:80, 20.10.2009. www.finlex.fi
8. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Finland. precedent no. KKO:2011:46. www.finlex.fi
9. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Swiden. Högsta domstolen. NJA 2001. s. 563. www.notisum.se/rnp/domar/hd/HD001563.htm
10. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Helsinki Court of Appeal. HelHO:2007:22. 9.3.2007. Dnro:R 06/2199. www.finlex.fi
11. Pasi Pölönen. Testimony in criminal proceedings. Pasi Pölönen: Henkilötodistelu Rikosprosessissa.
12. ECHR: Eckle.v.Germany. Judgment 15/07/1982-5. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
13. ECHR: Fayed v. The United Kingdom. Application 17101/90. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
14. ECHR: Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, Application 34720/97. http://echr.ketse.com/doc/34720.97-en-19990921/view/
15. ECHR: I.J.L. and others v. The United Kingdom. Application No 29522/95, 30056/96, 30574/96. Date of Judgment 25/09/2001. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
16. ECHR: John Murray v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 February 1996. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
17. ECHR: Marttinen v. Finland. Application 19235/03. Date of Judgment 21/07/2009. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
18. ECHR: Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17/12/ 1996 г., http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
19. ECHR: Weh v. Austria. Judgment 08/04/2004. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
20. Pellonpää M. Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus. Talentum. Helsinki.2005.
21. YLE uutiset. 3.5.2009. Suomi kerää EIT:n langettavia päätöksiä naapureitaan tiuhemmin. http://yle.fi/uutiset/suomi_keraa_eitn_langettavia_paatoksia_naapureitaan_tiuhemmin/5245941
2. European Convention on Human Rights. Rooma, 4 november 1950.http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/rus/treaties/html/005.htm
3. The Constution of Finland. 731/1999. Suomen perustuslaki, Act no. 11.6.1999/731. www.finlex.fi
4. Konkurssilaki (31.1.2013/86). www.finlex.fi
5. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The Code of Enforcement of Finland. Oikeudenkäymiskaari. 1.1.1734/4. www.finlex.fi
6. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Finland. precedent no. KKO:2009:27, 17.4.2009. www.finlex.fi
7. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Finland. precedent no. KKO:2009:80, 20.10.2009. www.finlex.fi
8. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Finland. precedent no. KKO:2011:46. www.finlex.fi
9. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Supreme Court of Swiden. Högsta domstolen. NJA 2001. s. 563. www.notisum.se/rnp/domar/hd/HD001563.htm
10. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � The decision of Helsinki Court of Appeal. HelHO:2007:22. 9.3.2007. Dnro:R 06/2199. www.finlex.fi
11. Pasi Pölönen. Testimony in criminal proceedings. Pasi Pölönen: Henkilötodistelu Rikosprosessissa.
12. ECHR: Eckle.v.Germany. Judgment 15/07/1982-5. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
13. ECHR: Fayed v. The United Kingdom. Application 17101/90. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
14. ECHR: Heaney and McGuinness v. Ireland, Application 34720/97. http://echr.ketse.com/doc/34720.97-en-19990921/view/
15. ECHR: I.J.L. and others v. The United Kingdom. Application No 29522/95, 30056/96, 30574/96. Date of Judgment 25/09/2001. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
16. ECHR: John Murray v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 February 1996. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
17. ECHR: Marttinen v. Finland. Application 19235/03. Date of Judgment 21/07/2009. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
18. ECHR: Saunders v. the United Kingdom, 17/12/ 1996 г., http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
19. ECHR: Weh v. Austria. Judgment 08/04/2004. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
20. Pellonpää M. Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimus. Talentum. Helsinki.2005.
21. YLE uutiset. 3.5.2009. Suomi kerää EIT:n langettavia päätöksiä naapureitaan tiuhemmin. http://yle.fi/uutiset/suomi_keraa_eitn_langettavia_paatoksia_naapureitaan_tiuhemmin/5245941