DYNAMICS OF THE THEORETICAL RATIONALE FOR THE CONCEPT OF “TRADITION” AND ITS CLASSIFICATION

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published: Apr 4, 2022

Abstract

The article is devoted to the dynamics and evolution of the concept of «tradition» which for a long time in European historiography has evolved into a synergy of related sciences such as philosophy, ethnology, religion, art history, ethnography, and others. In this work, the content of the etymology of the concept of “tradition” is deciphered, the types and classification of this concept are analyzed, which comprehensively constitutes scientific knowledge on this issue. The foundation of a meaningful understanding of the concept of “tradition” was and continues to be the result of material and spiritual socio-cultural heritage, which determines national identity and statehood and is the result of collective human activity in general and each nation in particular. The following research is based on the heuristic method of systematization of existing modern scientific thought, which formed the cultural studies direction of the reconstruction of the holistic process of the problem; historical and retrospective for the study of historical and theoretical aspects of the content of the concept of “tradition”, the evolution of development in national and foreign historiography, and chronological to reveal the state of scientific research on the problem in historical and chronological order.

How to Cite

Balabushka, V. (2022). DYNAMICS OF THE THEORETICAL RATIONALE FOR THE CONCEPT OF “TRADITION” AND ITS CLASSIFICATION. Baltic Journal of Legal and Social Sciences, (2), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.30525/2592-8813-2021-2-3
Article views: 143 | PDF Downloads: 119

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

types of traditions, classification of traditions, rationale for the concept of “tradition”

References
1. Artiuh V. (2010). The notion of “tradition” in Ukrainian conservative national historysophy. Visnyk Harkivskogo nacionalnogo universytety im. V. Karazina. Ser “The theory of culture and philosophy of science”, vol. 39, pp. 47–52 [in Ukrainian].
2. Balabushka V., Yaremchenko V. (2018). Some aspects of the investigation of the notion “tradition” in social and cultural sphere structure. Kultura Ukrayiny, vol. 62, pp. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.31516/2410-5325.062.01 [in Ukrainian].
3. Byktagyrova G. (2013). Interdisciplinary analysis of the notion “tradition”. Fundamentalnyie issledovaniya, vol. 6 (part 3), pp. 725–729.
4. Galushko K. The tradition historical. Retrieved from: http://www.history.org.ua/?termin=Tradytsiia_istorychna, (accessed last seen 3. 12. 2021), [in Ukrainian].
5. Gnudka K. (2014). Folklore traditions as a guarantee of saving the cultural folk originality in globalization conditions. Kultura Ukrayiny, vol. 45, pp. 132–140 [in Ukrainian].
6. Gofman A. (2008). Traditional or rational? Interpretation in Veber’s creative work. Sociologicheskiye issledovaniya, vol. 4 (April), pp. 120–129 [in Russian].
7. Drobceva S. (2013). Vliyaniye duhovnyh traditsiy na sotciokulturnuyu transformatsyiu chelovieka: sushchnost i mechanism protsessa [The impact of spiritual traditions on social and cultural person transformation: process essence and mechanism] (PhD Thesis), Nizniy Novgorod: Nizhegorodsky State Lobachevsky University.
8. Kovalskyi G. (2015). Traditionalistic construct of Ukrainian social life. DonNu, [in Ukrainian].
9. Manuilova K. (2017). National traditions role in the formation of Ukrainian public authority decentralization foundations. Menedzer, vol. № 1, pp. 35–41 [in Ukrainian].
10. Pityakova T. (2015). Tradition and novation correlation: antique discourse. Universytetska kafedra, vol. 4, pp. 77–86 [in Ukrainian].
11. Ragozyn N. (2016). Tradition as an objective form of social and historical continuity NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophiya. Sociologiya. Pravo, vol. 37, № 17 (238), pp. 48–55 [in Russian].
12. Sablukov A. (2020). Traditions in social ruling. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Social science, vol. 4 (841), pp. 280–295 [in Russian].
13. Stepanskaya T., Naumova V. (2017). Traditions and modernity. Mir nauki, kultury, obrazovaniya, vol. 2 (63), pp. 261–263. Retrieved from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/traditsii-isovremennost-2 [in Russian].
14. Steshenko A. (2008). Tradytsiya ta novatsiya v ukrainskiy filosofii kintsia XVIII – pochatku ХХ st. [Tradition and novation in Ukrainian philosophy in XVIII – beg. of ХХ cent.] (PhD Thesis), Kyiv: Taras Shevchenko National University.
15. Sheiko O. (2001). Tradytsiya yak faktor samorozvytku suspilstva [Tradition as a factor of society self-development] (PhD Thesis), Zaporizhzhia: Zaporizhzhia State University.
16. Shuba O. (1989). Orthodoxy and national culture tradition. Znannya, URSR [in Ukrainian].
17. Shchedrin A. (2012). Rene Genon’s traditionalism as a worldview paradigm: (social and cultural contexts). Kultura Ukrayiny, vol. 36, pp. 112–124 [in Ukrainian].